Evinrude 25 Hp Serial Number

[Mellissa Sprock]

Yourselling dealer has a special interest in your satisfaction and should be consulted first if you have any concerns about your Johnson power product. Your authorized Evinrude dealer is your primary contact for service, product information, and Evinrude and Johnson Genuine Parts

Please read your owners manual for all operation and maintenance information for your engine. It lists all the adjustments and routine maintenance procedures for your motor, including off-season storage and pre-season service. We encourage you to work with your authorized Evinrude dealer for all the services you require.If you have a concern with your engine that your dealer is unable to resolve, please have your engine model number and serial number available, and contact us.

In order to provide better assistance to all our customers, we are only providing technical advice on outboard products manufactured since 1997. For assistance on 1996 and older outboard products or any stern drive products, please see your local dealer. For more specific contact information please select a world region below or a type of contact:

Please contact our Customer Support Services at 844-345-4BRP (4277). For fastest service, please have the serial number and model number of your motor available for the representative who answers your call.

If you are an Evinrude dealer, please contact us by calling the Dealer Support Services Hot-Line. Please have your dealer code to access the automated answering system. You should also call this number if you have an open account.

Parts get switched around over the years and there is that possibility with the motor you are looking at. Although the same inside, the 4263 Evinrude Mate was a bit more stylish than its cousin, the 4264 Elto Cub. The Mate had side covers while the Cub was open with an exposed fuel tank, similar to the Pal.

The Elto Cub cost $29.50 in 1941, the Evinrude Mate was $34.50. More Cubs were sold plus some Mate owners lost covers. This made Cubs more common and Mates more valuable. Many collectors put Mate covers on Cubs to increase there value. No Mate or Cub production numbers survived World War Two. The parts books just grouped them together. All three years books are exactly the same. . . ?

The model and serial numbers of the vertical drive should be located on the engine model and serial number plate. If the vertical drive model and serial numbers are not recorded with the engine model and serial number, they can be found on a plate located on the vertical drive. The transom mount model and serial number plate is located on the inner transom plate.

The serial number tag is located near the STARTER, by the flywheel housing; or, on the ROCKER ARM or FLAME ARRESTOR COVER.Transom plates: The serial number tag is located on the INNER TRANSOM PLATE inside the boat; or, on the UPPER SWIVEL PIN.

Evinrude changed how they indicate year in the model number in 1980. Depending on the whether your engine is from before or after that year determins how you will find your Evinrude engine year information.

The first serial number sold in a year becomes the beginning serial number. Serial numbers between that year's beginning serial number and the next fall into the same year. Search for your engine horsepower on the Mercury Mariner serial number year chart located here to find the beginning serial number for the range that includes your engine.

IMPORTANT! If you place and pay for your order, indicating the wrong numbers (especially for the CS (Checksum number)), I will be forced to cancel your order and make a refund of your payment, minus PayPal fees for the transaction. Please be careful when placing your order. PCN number is not the same as the number CS. Do not place an order if the Checksum number is missing on the label!

US Boatworks stocks over 2 million new and used boat parts to meet all your needs. When you place your order online, save up to 25% off retail prices. Use our Evinrude outboard motor parts finder to view engine drawings to find the manufacturer part number you need. Select that part and place it directly in your shopping cart.

Our Evinrude parts inventory with microfiche lookup makes shopping for boat parts easy.

Evinrude Parts Finder Tool: Finding the right parts for your Evinrude boat is simple with our Evinrude Parts Finder tool. Enter your model number and instantly access a tailored list of parts that fit your engine. This tool takes the guesswork out of shopping for boat parts, ensuring you get exactly what you need quickly and accurately.

No question as to the sufficiency of the evidence is raised. Appellant, Garland Wayne Copeland and Leon Deryl Pinkston were found in possession of a 33 horse-power *636 Evinrude outboard motor of the value of over $50 about 4:30 in the morning of September 23, 1971. The outboard motor proved to have been stolen from the possession of E. G. T. Bates on that night, having been taken from a barge on Lake Arlington.

Appellant and his two companions were observed by Officer Larry Wayne Robertson of the Arlington Police Department in a Mustang automobile, which was stuck in the mud, near the lake shore, moving slowly toward the roadway. As it pulled onto the roadway, Officer Robertson stopped the car to see "what it was doing down there near the boat docks" where there were a number of boats kept. The Mustang was very muddy, and was sitting very low as if it had a heavy load in the back of it. The officer noticed muddy hand prints on the trunk area, and on the rear bumper area there appeared to be mud and sand running out of the trunk lid onto the bumper and on the ground.

The officer approached the car on the driver's side and asked the three male occupants for identification. The driver was Copeland, who showed Robertson a "mug" shot with a number on it, showing it was from the Louisiana State Penitentiary, and said he had been out of the penitentiary three months before. He said the car belonged to his mother, that he and the other two had gone fishing, but the officer could not see any fishing poles, gear or equipment. Officer Robertson testified:

The three occupants of the car, one of whom was appellant, were asked to get out of the car. Officer Seals arrived in response to a radio call. When the three men got out of the car, they were wet and muddy to the waist. In the meantime, Sgt. Dan Martin of the Arlington Police also arrived.

The Evinrude motor was identified by the owner E. G. T. Bates. It had the shipping cable, the throttle cable, the electrical cable and the steering cables cut. The remainder of those cables were on the barge from which the motor had been removed.

On his motion to suppress he testified that he did not give his consent to search the automobile. He did not claim coercion or in any manner raise an issue as to the involuntary nature of the consent testified to by Officer Robertson.

Appellant objected to evidence as to the Evinrude outboard motor found in the trunk of the Mustang occupied by himself, Copeland and Pinkston on the ground of an unlawful search and seizure. At the conclusion of a hearing outside the presence of the jury, the trial court found that the officer lawfully stopped the Mustang to make an investigation, that he lawfully made an arrest under Art. 14.03, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., that permission was granted to search the automobile, and denied the motion to suppress.

Appellant complains that the court erred in not charging the jury that, if they had a reasonable doubt that any evidence was obtained by an unwarranted or unreasonable search, the jury should not use it against appellant.

Since appellant did not testify before the jury that he did not give his consent to search the automobile, the evidence was therefore undisputed that he gave such consent, and there was no issue on this subject to be decided by the jury. Further, the requested charge did not ask for the issue of consent vel non to be submitted to the jury. The charge as requested would have given the jury no rule or guide by which to determine whether the search was unwarranted or unreasonable, and would have submitted to the jury a question of law and not of fact. Black v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 428; Fisher v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 493 S.W.2d 841 (1973); Campbell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 492 S.W.2d 956, (1973); Ainsworth v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 493 S.W.2d 517 (1973).

By his ground of error number one, appellant claims that this case must be reversed because the assistant district attorney, in his opening argument to the jury, referred to the failure of appellant to testify.

In Ramos v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 419 S.W.2d 359, speaking for this Court, Judge Onion wrote that a statement by the prosecuting attorney in argument, "under our laws after a man is arrested he cannot be compelled to give evidence against himself. He doesn't have to take the stand. It's in the charge," was in that case harmless error.

The statement of the assistant district attorney was not in derogation of the right of appellant not to testify. It was in full recognition of that right, and did no more than paraphrase the charge of the court. We hold it to be harmless error and overrule ground of error number one.

This exhibition highlighted some of the most significant engineering marvels in Milwaukee's history and includes photographs, documents, ephemera, and a number of the actual machines highlighted in the book by engineer Thomas Fehring, who served as co-curator alongside Museum Director James Kieselburg.

Two awards for historical exhibits on Wisconsin themes are offered each year: one for an exhibition budget of $5,000 or less and one for an exhibition budget greater than $5,000. The Grohmann Museum received the award for an exhibition greater than $5,000. Each award is given to the organization that creates an exhibit that meets the award criteria and, in the opinion of the judges, made the most valuable contribution to public understanding of Wisconsin's past during the preceding calendar year.

3a8082e126