Malware attacks on ThoughtWorks

15 views
Skip to first unread message

Andy Yates

unread,
Feb 3, 2011, 7:48:16 AM2/3/11
to ccnet-devel
Folks --

As you may already know, ThoughtWorks is currently the subject of a
malware advisory across a number of our sites. Whilst we are working
to discover what the cause of these issues is, we will need to take
down a number of sites where spam links / malware have been
discovered, including some that you may care about. We will endeavour
to bring things back in to service as soon as possible - and thank you
for your patience in the meantime.

For the short term, we will be redirecting ccnet.thoughtworks.com to
http://ccnet.sourceforge.net/CCNET/Documentation.html, and will be
closing off external access to http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/

I know that this community, in particular, has been very careful about
removing spam links to the site, and I can only apologise for the
inconvenience that this will cause. I am keen to figure out a good
long term solution to the issue, and welcome your thoughts and
comments on how we might be able to achieve that. If you have any
concerns, please feel free to contact me directly.

with thanks for your understanding


-- Andy

David Schmitt

unread,
Feb 16, 2011, 2:26:17 AM2/16/11
to ccnet...@googlegroups.com


While I cannot speak for the resident developers or the community at
large, other wikis use a combination of registration, captchas and
vigilant user banning/reverting for combatting attacks. More advanced
measures include edit rate limiting, and forbidding the addition of
external links by "new" users.

Would it be possible to organize a recent (and clean) copy of the site
to put up on SF? the pages there are like from 2005 or something.


Good luck with the hunt, David
--
dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web: http://dasz.at
Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999

FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg

Ruben Willems

unread,
Feb 16, 2011, 2:15:23 PM2/16/11
to ccnet...@googlegroups.com
Hi

there is a documentation link in the upper left corner on your dashboard.
That has the documentation of your version.

About the docs on sf.net, any preference on a system?
mediawiki?
or something else?

and since we're now looking at the options of sf.net,
would enabling git also be good idea ?

I only worked with git on github, I've got no experience with git on sourceforge.
Any input greatly appreciated


with kind regards
Ruben Willems

David Schmitt

unread,
Feb 17, 2011, 2:15:09 AM2/17/11
to ccnet...@googlegroups.com
On 16.02.2011 20:15, Ruben Willems wrote:
> Hi
>
> there is a documentation link in the upper left corner on your dashboard.
> That has the documentation of your version.

Thanks, I was looking for the 1.6 releasenotes though, which didn't come
with my 1.5 ;-) In the end I found them in the 1.6 zip.

> I only worked with git on github, I've got no experience with git on
> sourceforge.
> Any input greatly appreciated

Using git would end all discussion about the quality of sf hosting,
since it would be pretty painless to have mirrors of the repository on
github and wherever. (Yes, I _am_ a git fanboy ;)


Best Regards, David

Daniel Nauck

unread,
Feb 17, 2011, 2:18:38 AM2/17/11
to ccnet...@googlegroups.com
I maintain a git mirrow for ccnet: https://github.com/dnauck/CruiseControl.NET

But i also vote to switch completly to git, the sf.net svn is damn slow.

2011/2/17 David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages