Tell me about it, life sure gets busy :-)
>
> Earlier there had been discussion about including non-campus groups
> and over the last couple of months. I'm inclined to let them
> participate. Thoughts on going forward on this so we can include them
> (or not) in 2009?
I think it'd be really helpful to have anyone interested in helping
out to join. Before, I was pondering if having more 'exclusivity'
would keep things more effective, but I believe that having everyone
helping spread the word and work together would be great.
>
> Does anyone feel like attending an organizational meeting, maybe
> during SCaLE (if anyone else is going) in February? Or it doesn't have
> to be at SCaLE -- we can find a place that sort of central to everyone
> and a place that can host us for possibly a day.
I've sent out emails to some staff at UCSD and USC, so I'm trying to
get some different people together to meet at SCaLE with stuff; I was
going to send an email to the list once I was done with finals. So I'm
totally in support of that :-)
>
> Another thought: Formalizing the group with a constitution, officers,
> etc., in 2009. Thoughts?
>
> Larry Cafiero
>
Joe Smith