Do you know how the MozCC scans the page to find the licenses? I am
guessing that it looks for commented RDFs snippets inside the html.
I have dropped the support for embed commented rdf on CCHits because
it looks like a bad idea in general and also brokes if a track or
artist contains -- in the name. So the RDF version is one alternate
link, like the ones used for RSS autodiscover.
I should probably look more into the RDFa docs and use it, although I
think MozCC still doesnt support it either. If anyone has a better
suggestion on how to improve the page integration with MozCC and
other plugins and agents (Songbird, anyone?) please reply. Meanwhile
I will be running some tests here to make the page more friendly to
MozCC users.
Thanks for the feedback!
--
Fabricio C Zuardi
http://cchits.org
Since the page seens to has just one licence specification, I'd try to
remove the link rel="alternate" to the RDF as a test.
If I'm not wrong, RDFa will work only with XHTML 2. :(
https://launchpad.net/products/cchits/+bug/49754
--
Fabricio C Zuardi
http://cchits.org