Hello All!
I'm hoping for any and all input/suggestions/etc.
Our campus bookstore management was recently moved to Follett. In the past few semesters I have found that they will list the print version of an OER (such as OpenStax) as "required", and will not include a link to the free online version. The list price is often $40+.
I recently learned that bookstore staff are asking faculty for links to all OER/ZTC materials being used by faculty to remain aligned and in compliance with AB607. It is my understanding that the language in the bill does not require bookstores to list links to OER materials (the "display estimated costs" language is directed towards for-cost textbooks); and, additionally, we are already compliant by the use of our ZTC icon within the class schedule (identifying no-cost courses).
I sent an email to that effect to the bookstore staff, and they sent a reply referencing PLAW (section 112) and the HEOA, and that AB607 is a reinforcement of HEOA. They stated their goal is to ensure transparency and reporting for students.
Transparency is great, and it would be great for students to encounter a bookstore page for their course that states their course required textbook is an OER and is freely available online (and even list an inexpensive print option as a choice, though not required). But that has not been the case.
I guess my question is whether I am correct that we are already AB607 compliant, even without including links to OERs in the course listing for textbooks within the online bookstore.
Either way, I will be sending another email to the bookstore asking for a conversation regarding the listing of print versions as required.
Thanks!
Corrie