--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "C&C 34/36 Owners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cc-3436+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/D42EA335-E05E-4D76-8838-3D93BA6FE6F6%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "C&C 34/36 Owners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cc-3436+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/D42EA335-E05E-4D76-8838-3D93BA6FE6F6%40gmail.com.
--David KnechtS/V Aries1990 C&C 34+New London, CT
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "C&C 34/36 Owners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cc-3436+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/D42EA335-E05E-4D76-8838-3D93BA6FE6F6%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "C&C 34/36 Owners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cc-3436+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/D42EA335-E05E-4D76-8838-3D93BA6FE6F6%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/CAAmhKuuNNZTV7kvJcn4XOiuhJuGBbL-buy-6ryZF9MLCOcUX0w%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/1F770379-4C82-4CCF-A012-B53482CAA250%40gmail.com.
On Feb 6, 2026, at 4:46 PM, Chuck Scheaffer <scheaff...@gmail.com> wrote:
Those polars are based on a clean bottom, good sails including spinnaker. I never know if they involve a spinnaker for reaching.C
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 4:41 PM David Knecht <davida...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Chuck- I had the same thought but felt that velocity would be a pretty useless parameter to work toward as an upwind target. Technically, that would be "speed" not "velocity" since velocity has a directional vector which is why we have VMG where the vector is toward the mark. I was actually even more concerned about the downwind target. 146 vs. 170 is really different as an optimal target. I will believe the polar plot data since it is pretty clear where the numbers come from and I don't know where the table data comes from. Dave
David KnechtS/V Aries1990 C&C 34+New London, CT
<pastedGraphic.tiff>
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/CAAmhKuvV5c1xje2dVt7odqK1AUivg58mG1Y3YxAAAADBraGfOg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cc-3436/F646793C-CE1D-4251-BF4C-FEE2791DF902%40gmail.com.