Dear cBioPortal team,
First, I would like to thank you for providing cBioPortal as such an amazing resource for the research community. It has been extremely helpful in my work.
While browsing the data, I noticed something unusual in the study Gastric Cancer (OncoSG, 2018). A large set of X-chromosomal genes (almost all) are marked as homozygous deleted in nearly 100% of the samples. Since these genes include essential ones, and this phenomenon was not mentioned in the linked publication, I was wondering whether this might reflect an experimental or computational artifact.
Could you please share your thoughts or recommendations on how best to handle this dataset? Specifically:
Have any steps been taken to ensure the validity of these CNA calls?
Were any bias correction or data normalization procedures applied that might explain this pattern?
Do you suggest treating these data points with caution when performing downstream analyses?
I would greatly appreciate your insights on this, as well as any advice on best practices for handling such anomalies.
Thank you again for all your efforts in maintaining and improving cBioPortal.
With best regards,
Florian Andersch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cbioportal+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cbioportal/eee41f64-a7da-4a95-8852-e42357092951n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cbioportal/fff79fdd-8399-4f30-ae93-05926f651cd1n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cbioportal/fff79fdd-8399-4f30-ae93-05926f651cd1n%40googlegroups.com.