Hi all,
I’m currently importing discrete copy number alteration (CNA) data into a local cBioPortal instance. My CNA calls were generated using CGHcall within the QDNAseq package. My data are shallow WGS (sWGS) data and since GISTIC is not optimized for sWGS, so I’m using CGHcall’s output instead.
I’ve formatted my CNA file (data_cna.txt) as gene-level, with the structure:
My meta_cna.txt looks like this:
While doing gene query, the import passes validation and displays CNAs correctly in the OncoPrint tab (Deep Deletion and Amplification). However, I noticed:
CNAs do not show up in the Mutations tab
Changing the stable_id to gistic did seem to make CNAs visible in that tab.
So my questions are:
Is there any difference in downstream behavior or analysis depending on what stable_id is used (e.g., cna vs gistic)?
Is it okay to use stable_id: gistic for CNA data not produced by GISTIC (in my case, CGHcall)?
Are there other configurations or metadata settings I might be missing?
Thank you for your time and help!
Best,
Ji Hen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cbioportal+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cbioportal/2a0abae9-f1a7-4809-ab58-f4d748030170n%40googlegroups.com.