Hello,
I have downloaded a study data using the R library cbioportalR.
For some reason, I found inconsistency between the file I’ve downloaded using the R library and the one I’ve downloaded from the web portal.
For example, looking at copy number alteration table, for the study Id acc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018, I looked for the value of gene A1BG for sample id TCGA-OR-A5J1-01.
This is the R code that I’ve used:
df <- get_genetics_by_study(study_id = "acc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018")
cna_A1BG <- subset(df$cna, hugoGeneSymbol == "A1BG" & sampleId == "TCGA-OR-A5J1-01")
dim(cna_A1BG)
[1] 0 9
There is no such entry in the downloaded table, but in the web portal there is, and the alteration value is -1:
acc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018 |
TCGA-OR-A5J1-01 |
-1 |
Moreover, when I looked at the unique values of “alteration” column it has only either 2 or -2.
Just to make sure, is this the right way to interpret the alteration values:
-2 = homozygous deletion;
-1 = hemizygous deletion;
0 = neutral / no change; 1 = gain;
2 = high level amplification.
I would really appreciate your help on that,
Thanks,
Shelly
GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cbioportal+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cbioportal/VI1P137MB0197B9B6A5FD2309221BBF0DBD31A%40VI1P137MB0197.EURP137.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Hi Benjamin,
Thank you for the fast reply!
The steps I did are as follow:
The downloaded file is attached, and the example I gave is in line 202.
Again, from the file I’ve downloaded using the R api, the only alteration values are -2 and 2 for this study id.
Thanks again for the help!
From:
Benjamin Gross <benjami...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 18:51
To: Shelly Aviv <shelly...@gsk.com>
Cc: cbiop...@googlegroups.com <cbiop...@googlegroups.com>, Eyal Itskovits <eyal.x.i...@gsk.com>
Subject: Re: [cbioportal] Inconstancy in the downloaded study table
EXTERNAL
On Jul 11, 2023, at 2:48 PM, Shelly Aviv <shelly...@gsk.com> wrote:
Hi Benjamin,Thank you for the fast reply!The steps I did are as follow:
- Type A1BG in the query line
- Go to Download tab
- Download Copy-number Alterations (OQL is not in effect)
The downloaded file is attached, and the example I gave is in line 202.Again, from the file I’ve downloaded using the R api, the only alteration values are -2 and 2 for this study id.Thanks again for the help!
From: Benjamin Gross <benjami...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 18:51
To: Shelly Aviv <shelly...@gsk.com>
Cc: cbiop...@googlegroups.com <cbiop...@googlegroups.com>, Eyal Itskovits <eyal.x.i...@gsk.com>
Subject: Re: [cbioportal] Inconstancy in the downloaded study tableEXTERNAL
Hi Shelly,I’m not finding an alteration for this gene/sample combination (see image below and CNA table w/filter for A1BG). Can you send me a link to the web portal where you see this alteration value?You are correctly interpreting the CNA discrete values. Here is further info on our FAQ
<PastedGraphic-4.png>
<cna_A1BG.csv>