Fwd: FW: FACTS :)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Santhosh Kumar K

unread,
Jan 2, 2013, 9:17:49 PM1/2/13
to claSS group, vp vignesh, Sundarraj Ravishankar, suriya gopalswamy, Santhosh N, Sowmiya Kathirvel, prem anna
Controversial...!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Santhosh Kumar Krishnamurthi06 <Santho...@infosys.com>
Date: 20 April 2012 17:42
Subject: FW: FACTS :)
To: "ksantho...@ymail.com" <ksantho...@ymail.com>
Cc: "santhos...@gmail.com" <santhos...@gmail.com>


 

 

From: Suhas Shenoy
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:57 AM
To: Anandh Meiyazhagan; Aravinth Kumar Veerachamy; ach...@gmail.com; Karthik Arumugam01; Bharanidharan Jayakumar; Kumaravel Karthikeyan; Ganeshkumar Venkadesan04; Gnana Sai Sangathi; Goutham Kathiresan; Harish Gunasekaran; Ishwarya Vijayakumar01; Karuppiah Subbiah; Krishnakumar Ramesan; Mahathi Keshav Puligundla; Mohammed Irfan Ul Huq Peer Mohammed02; Narendhra Kumar Murugan; Prabakaran GG; Ranjana Maharajan; Santhosh Kumar Krishnamurthi06; Santhosh Thangavel01; Sidharth Divakaran; Sreelal Sreekumar; Srinivas Raja Rajendran; Vasanth Venugopal; Vishnu Prasath Ramakrishnan
Subject: FW: FACTS :)

 


BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb

Aerial view of the Taj Mahal


Description: cid:image027.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60

The interior water well

Description: cid:image028.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome

Description: cid:image029.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Close up of the dome with pinnacle

Description: cid:image030.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Close up of the pinnacle

Description: cid:image031.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard

Description: cid:image032.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Red lotus at apex of the entrance

Description: cid:image033.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments

Description: cid:image034.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
View of sealed doors & windows in back

Description: cid:image035.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Typical Vedic style corridors

Description: cid:image036.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
The Music House--a contradiction

Description: cid:image037.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
A locked room on upper floor

Description: cid:image038.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
A marble apartment on ground floor

Description: cid:image039.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
The OM in the flowers on the walls

Description: cid:image040.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Staircase that leads to the lower levels

Description: cid:image041.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
300 foot long corridor inside apartments

Description: cid:image042.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level

Description: cid:image043.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms

Description: cid:image044.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Interior of another of the locked rooms

Description: cid:image045.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room

Description: cid:image046.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks

Description: cid:image047.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Secret walled door that leads to other rooms

Description: cid:image048.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Secret bricked door that hides more evidence

Description: cid:image049.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died

Description: cid:image050.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60
Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried

Description: cid:image051.jpg@01CB8743.08BCCA60

NOW READ THIS.......

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the
whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says
the
Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of

Lord Shiva
(then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research O
ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle,
Badshahnama,
Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra
was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur
still
retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for
surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for
dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried
in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says

the term "
Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries
from Afghanisthan to Algeria .
"The unusual explanation that the term Taj
Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.

Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's
name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale cre ated
by
court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a
single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates
Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a
few
samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed
that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan
Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's
death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no
reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the
Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather
than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak
asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples
Fearing political
backlash, Indira Gandhi's government t ried to have Prof. Oak's book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or
validate Oak's research.

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Ma hal under
U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***



--
Regards,
Santhosh.
image011.jpg
image005.jpg
image021.jpg
image002.jpg
image019.jpg
image006.jpg
image014.jpg
image018.jpg
image016.jpg
image008.jpg
image009.jpg
image004.jpg
image007.jpg
image015.jpg
image023.jpg
image010.jpg
image012.jpg
image003.jpg
image017.jpg
image025.jpg
image001.jpg
image020.jpg
image022.jpg
image013.jpg
image024.jpg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages