Php Designer 8 1 Key And Validation Key
Vaniria Setser
It's difficult for me to see what Snaps are in use to give an accurate assessment on performance, but if performance continues to be an issue, contact your SnapLogic Customer Success Manager or SnapLogic Support.
One thing to note is that validation only uses a sample of data (50 records by default) so it's possible that any filtering in your pipeline may have removed those 50 records and there was nothing left to work with, which is why it looks like it did not finish.
Hi @WhatIsThis
After looking at your picture (quite difficult), My question is on the left bottom the joins, it seems that they are still waiting for input document but with which snaps are they connected ? Because if the mid right snaps is still waiting for a response from somwhere and that is connected to the other joins snap they are waiting for all inputs until further processing normally. So you need to look that there is not an infinite loop for waiting on each other while the one cannot get started without the other:
We have one email address in the table person, that should be validated. If an invalid email address is entered, a message should be displayed below that field. We added a Validation node under the field for that matter.
Hi Hanno,
Thank you for your response.
Your solution could indeed help me.
However, we have multiple email fields in our application ( used for much more than just saving data), and creating a custom field to temporarily hold each email address could soon become tough to manage and hard to debug.
So for now we'll deactivate the "Formatting Script" rule. This way the email validation will occur only in the web application with our custom rules.
Thank you and best regards!
I need to take group of email id's which consist of official emails and non official email ids. From that group of email ids, validate those group of email ids, then if those are contains non official emails then we need to ask for approval for specific group.
For example user is entered 5-10 group of email ids in those group 6 email ids are official I mean like ma...@gmail.com, @yahoo.com, @hotmail.com, @outlook.com.... Above domains all are official domains, but user is entered like @abc.com, @XYZ.com, @mno.com.....etc. So here we have list of official domains with us, not sure about unofficial domains, how many they are going to enter, I mean we are not sure on the unofficial email domains.
Here I have used action so by using inputs I have taken the input from the variables, same way after all the validation kept the result in output again, so that we can use the outputs variable in flow. Attached the screenshot with code snippet.
from the above code we need to return the unofficial email count or size back to flow, if we get at least one unofficial email then we need to ask for special group approval. Theoretically I am clear while implementing, not able to implement correctly.
Design verification provides evidence (test results) that the design outputs (actual product) meet the design inputs (product requirements and design specifications). Depending on the item being verified, a test case or test suite would be run, or an inspection or analysis done to provide the required evidence.
When collected together in a V&V Report, the combination of verification and validation test results, along with traceability back to user needs, product requirements, and design specifications, provides part of the evidence the FDA requires when submitting a medical device for clearance.
Test plan, test cases, test execution records, and test results should be documented and maintained as a part of design records. Validation, in its entirety, is not the result of a single activity, but the collection of results from all validation activities.
Test procedures are executed as planned. Any invalid results are documented and reviewed, and either accepted or logged as defects. Defects in the product are resolved and released, and regression testing is performed. A traceability matrix is created to verify that design inputs identified in the verification test plan have been tested and passed.
Reporting is performed at the end of each phase of verification. Detailed reports include configuration management and release reports, test results by testing type or product version, and issues found during the verification activity. A design verification traceability report shows test results and coverage for the requirements. Finally, reviews are completed and approved after each design verification activity.
It takes much less maintenance effort to maintain traceability as your requirements, designs, and tests evolve than it does to patch critical holes in design and development at the 11th hour. This effort can also help you identify how much work is left, where you might need to add development or test staff, or when you should re-evaluate delivery schedules.
Being able to link anomalies directly to a requirement improves communication between testers and developers. It is extremely helpful. Generating anomalies directly from a test protocol failure means that more detail about the issue is captured. As a result, problems can be more easily documented, reproduced, fixed, and retested.
Design validation and verification are essential components of successful device development. With shared understanding among the team, as well as the right tools, you have solid framework for getting your device to market.
Nico Krger is the former Director of Global Sales Engineering at Perforce. He specializes in technical guidance and product development efficiency for global organizations. An expert in software development, he is dedicated to helping customers drive quality product strategy.
When I review the Project Workspace > Status window I can see a validation warning "Validation is outdated". Why do I get this and how can I resolve it?
Image
This validation warning can appear under the Validation, Model, Analysis and Design sub-branches. Typically you will see this message if you make edits to the model file or invalidate an analysis or design in some way.
There is a dependency that before any analysis and/or design can be performed Model validation must be completed. Before an Analysis, both Model and Analysis validation must be completed and finally before a Design - Model, Analysis and Design validation must all be completed. All of this is automatically undertaken when you click an Analysis or Design command. Model validation can however, be manually undertaken at any time and we actively encourage you to do this as you build up the model in order to correct issues as they arise.
To remove the "Validation is outdated" check either run an Analysis and/or Design or a Model validation as appropriate to re-check validation.
Anyway, every designer has a validation method, and sometimes they vary so much that efforts are made at a corporate level to set a standard or minimum requirement to create some consistency.Whatever the strategy, here are the core components of an effective electrical validations strategy:
So with so many components, there is a lot of freedom to create your own method, and with that freedom comes the responsibility to not miss anything. If you ask ten engineers on the most effective validation flow, you may get more than ten opinions, since there are many variables and everyone is trying to be the most effective in the time allowed. So as an EDA vendor, it is our responsibility to provide the above capabilities to the users and the flexibility to create innumerable flows to best validate a design. There are many ways to do it wrong, but there are also many ways to do it right and Cadence provides all of the above capabilities within the Virtuoso family of tools, for you can pick what works for you.
Dependingon the requirements of your situation, you can specify one or moreof the following patterns to control how field values, such as textfields, numeric fields, and date/time fields are formatted at runtime:
A display pattern, which describes how data will be displayedin the form. If you define an initial default value, it is formattedaccording to the display pattern. The display pattern is also responsiblefor formatting user input and any bound values retrieved at runtime.
The formatting options that you choose will depend on the purposeof your form. For example, if you are designing an interactive form,for each field you should define an edit pattern to process userinput and a validation pattern to validate the input. You wouldonly define a data pattern if the fields are bound to a data source.
Keep in mind that if you specify only an Edit pattern for a NumericField or Decimal fields object, form fillers can still enter alphabeticcharacters in the field. To avoid this behaviour, do one of thefollowing actions:
Usepatterns to control how field values are processed at run time.For example, users can enter letters and numbers into a text fieldand any special punctuation or spacing can be applied automaticallyaccording to a predefined pattern before the value is displayed.
If you are creating a form to capture data, you can specifyhow data should be formatted. You specify how the data should appearusing a display pattern. If you do not specify a display pattern,the data appears according to Designer defaults.
If users will be entering data that does not match the Designerdefaults, you must specify an edit pattern. The edit pattern describesthe syntax of the user input. Given the pattern, the run-time applicationconverts the user input into a raw value and then formats the valueaccording to the display pattern.
7fc3f7cf58