John,
That one was one of the links i included and registered a
configuration component in the xml file, which could then be used by
the components which were registered using the fluent configuration
when those components are being resolved. I would rather not to use a
single configuration component for all these settings as they are not
related i.e. database connection string, max queue length, retry count
etc. Very often a dependant component will only depend on a single
property as a constructor parameter, so using properties from the
external configuration file as ideal.
I could create a number of configuration components where all related
settings are in the same components, but if there was a way to access
properties from the configuration file when doing the fluent
registration, i could avoid creating and registering any of these
configuration components
Pat
> From: pmcg <
pmcgr...@gmail.com>
> To: Castle Project Users <
castle-pro...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, 13 August, 2010 3:26:10 AM
> Subject: Mixing external configuration with fluent registration
>
> I'm trying to figure out how I can reference external configuration
> properties (i.e. Database connection strings, log paths etc.), which
> will be constructor parameters for components I am registering with
> the fluent registration. When using xml configuration I would simply
> have configured them as properties within the configuration file. When
> configuring a component I would simply have configured the constructor
> parameter using the #{propertyname} type syntax. I have tried this
> with Depends and Parameters methods, but neither have worked.
> Is it possible to use property values that have been defined within a
> configuration file when the container was being created? Or are the
> properties just available when constructing the container from the
> configuration file?
> I have seen examples where a configuration component is configured
> within the configuration file and can then be passed as a constructor
> parameter to other components that depend on the properties. This
> requires one or more configuration types, which I would prefer not to
> use. Would be nice to just inject the property values which are very
> often distinct configuration items.
>
> See these for examples of such configuration holding typeshttp://
mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2010/02/10-advanced-windsor-tricks-9.htmlhttp://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/12/31/didja-know-merging-windsor-...
>
> I can always fall back on programmatically accessing properties from
> the app settings section of my application configuration file when
> doing my fluent registration, but if someone has managed to use
> properties defined in the configuration file while registering the
> components using the fluent registration I would appreciate any advice
>
> Thanks in advance
> Pat
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
castle-pro...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
castle-project-u...@googlegroups.com.