judge

[IS Master LNU]

I’m so happy to have some friends that have a nice judgement:
· When they want postpone the submission date, it’s fair to be
anonymous and when somebody else wants to object against a non-justice
behaviour, it’s bad and they say any bad words to anonymous.
· None of them ask the reason of this act.
· None of them try to don’t judge before knowing the reality
not what professor(s) say(s)
· Easily blame spy to anonymous while most of them vote to
decrypt IP. Decrypting the IP is not SPY acting??!!!!
If you want to have right judgement this is the story:
What happened was that they decided to check our assignment with the
software before grading as the teachers of this course told to most of
us. Ok, bad or good there is a framework to justice the assignments.
It is not fair that some are compared with this framework and some
not. If a rule applied for all, then we can do a united act but if
this rule applied for some of the students, then it is not fair and
nothing can do. The thing that is asked is just a united behaviour.
To aware you, I should say that this software only compare the text
with the websites. So if one wrote a paragraph from the course book,
but someone else is wrote that paragraph in the website, the one is
blamed as plagiarism even references the book. So it is not a tool for
right justice. If you justice with this tool and others not, don’t you
want to apply this tool for all in order to show how it is foolish?
What I did was that after grading not before it, I just send this
email to the teacher that only show him you did not equality for all
and it was only for him to maybe wake up from this sleep. I never ask
him to affect none of your grades. If I was spy, I send it to a higher
decision person of this department not the teacher that claimed he saw
all of them. So, be sure that your grades are not affected by me. For
those who were at the email and those who maybe should be, it’s so
nice that you don’t like discrimination but don’t like to be in the
same situation as others.
But what teacher(s) did, is kidding the others to hide his act. So he
changed the face of the problem and told you in other way. They/he
tried to propaganda to hide the real problem that this is not a good
tool to justice. They/he discriminate(s) for some of us today and will
do it tomorrow for others. If you could not stand against
discrimination now, you should not expect others do it for you if you
were the next one in future. All people who want to hide their act use
this propaganda. It’s a routine. Now, imagine yourself for one minute
in discriminated situation and then judge about the propaganda. Please
be logic.
You all are living in a democratic environment but most of you showed
in your emails that don’t think in democratic way. It’s right of a
person that if there is any non-equality, at least (s)he can speak,
object or defence. Please respect to it.
Here in campus there are lots of free wireless networks and in some
other place of this city as well. So finding IP itself, don’t help to
solve the problem. Although I believe that decrypting IP is spying and
it is crime also, but if you think that email was a CRIME (!), you can
do it. But be aware of further law.
Me myself, don’t afraid of disclosing my name because I didn’t insult
any of you and I didn’t spying anything. Just I highlighted some parts
of your assignment that had the same problem and sent it to the person
who was claimed he saw all of them in order to show him that “you did
not the same for all and its discrimination”. If the teacher was
anyone else, surely I will send it with my email, I never afraid of
anybody while I’m saying the fact but unfortunately this teacher has
not good feedback to hear the fact. It was the only reason that I used
anonymous email.
At the end, I thank the insulting of all of you but I wish good luck
for you all. It had big lessons for me as well to know how many of
people in the real world could judge right and try to fight against
discrimination.


Best regards

[Aylin Kasapoglu]

Hey dear anonymous,

 

Nice to hear from you, if you are not happy with that situation, instead of acting by your own, you could tell your problem to us and we could act together- as you said united.. do you think that your act is united? you even did not share your problem with anyone and just point out some people in your email. Even you could send an email that you show your demand to check everyone by system not by showing the names and so on. if there is wrong you could share with everyone and I am sure many would support you. If there is discrimination, me myself is against it..and about the last anonymous email, it was not my intention.

 

Last point is we dont even know who you are, to whom we can ask the reason to do that action. even if your intention is to be fair, your way is totally wrong you should know it..

so good luck..what else can I say..

 

Aylin Kasapoglu

---

From: IS Master LNU <is.mas...@gmail.com>
To: case_sessions_for 2 year master students <case_sessions_for-2-...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wed, February 23, 2011 2:21:42 PM
Subject: judge

[FANTASTIC RITA]

Dear Anonymous, 

The facts are better to be detected by ourselves or at least neutral ones instead of your explanations. 

Your blunder is to HIDE your name at least in this clarifying email. Moreover, in my opinion you should point out any discovered mistakes to the authors rather than the professors, who are the judgers. 

If you are willing to show your positive purpose, STATE your name to let us know. I guess there are possibilities to understand or forgive you. Otherwise, keep being anonymous will irritate me or lose your standpoint with a positive nice purpose. 

Finally, I was having a hope to guess that peeping guy is a person we do not know or there are other possibilites. I am sorry and disappointed to know it is in this googlegroup, which means it is AROUND me. 

Later actions should be conducted in a safe environment with qualified members only. I'm trying to be a good-mannered person. So I'll also say good luck to everyone who can read this email. 

Written by: Chen-fan Xu 

--
Thanks a lot for your kindness!
Best Regards

[Tolga Yılmaz]

Hey,

 

i dont see any point to send an email which covers most of our classmates names with  our first assignment,which was highlighted by you.i was at Jaime's room because of this email.And this email came later ,after everybody got the grade.At least you think like that.But he didnt sign the grades.I saw my grades first.Then it was removed.Why? because of this mail.Why should i show you tolerance?From now on ,if i see any plagiarism or any cheating.it would be reported  directly by my mail.

 

If some sees a problem,s(he) should ask to whole classmates to get the opinion instead of sending anounymous mail.now you are talking about democracy.If you want to have participatory democracy or real democracy,you should have asked everyone.and tell us about the problem.i guess we are all wise to understand everything.this is something different.you just wanted to rise yourself through strikeover your classmates.

 

i failed many times in exams or in assignments.but i never blamed  my classmates because of that.i tried to talk the instructor.or tried to find another solutions.SOME PEOPLE ALWAYS LİKE SHORT CUTS, SOME DOESNT EVEN OTHER WAY İS A BİT HARDER AND LONGER.

 

Bye