The Articles of Confederation

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Carp

unread,
Oct 7, 2012, 9:36:50 PM10/7/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
In Civics :: Week 5, Part D, you were introduced to both the advantages and the disadvantages of the Articles of Confederation.  If you need to review them, the link takes you that point in the video.

Do you think that the Articles of Confederation might have been successful if the Continental Congress could have modified the document to "fix" the disadvantages (i.e., the lack of taxation powers or the power to establish a national currency)?

ryan thomas

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 6:51:46 PM10/9/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes, because the population would had increased and the economic system would increase too. 

sharniece jelks

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 7:12:23 PM10/9/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I really do believe the Articles of Confederation would have been successful with the added parts that would benefit the economy.

Jerome Sawyer

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 10:26:47 AM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes I believe the population and Econmy would have a raised to a certain level!

Dayshe Hardy

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 10:56:13 AM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
i think that artical of confederation would of been successful because they didnt have to pay taxes
at the time and people would of listen to them if they fix the disavantages

Dayshe Hardy

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 12:28:42 PM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
the population would increase.
the system would increase in too
but it they still wont b able to compromise. they still dont like each other money

Ashlee ryals

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 5:02:50 PM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I feel things would have been different if they would have fixed the problems.... They should have gave more power to governments... Rather than less... I think the world would different in many ways if they would have change it so that all 13 states would agree 2 it.

Darnel Dubose

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:00:04 PM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I think that the Articles Of Confederation could been successful because they would have power to generate revenue, they would have central government power, and power to control/regulate trade, and national court system.

zerek brown

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:28:18 PM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
yes i believe that the population an economy would increase to a higher level.

Armani Thomas

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 9:15:12 PM10/10/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes, of course I agree because it would have fixed all the spending cost that didn't nobody like due to the taxes and to that extent people wouldn't have problem living and that equals a higher population "hence" a better economy

Raenesha Reynolds

unread,
Oct 11, 2012, 9:32:54 AM10/11/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I agree with Ryan because the economy would have increased due to the population increasing!

Devonte Hawkins

unread,
Oct 11, 2012, 1:07:14 PM10/11/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
If the Continental Congress could have modified the document they would have tried to change the whole government.
Message has been deleted

Ashlee ryals

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 1:41:00 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I agree with ryan, sharniece, jerome, dayshe, darnel, zerek, armani, raenesha, and devonte you guys all said the same thing bout how the population and econmy would increase n I think that it would to

david clark

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 3:47:14 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Yes i think the articles of confederation would have been successful, because all 13 colonies would have been happy. Also there would have been less conflict

david clark

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 3:50:00 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I agree Devonte, the government would have change, because there wouldn't have been any disagreements

Jerome Sawyer

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 3:59:17 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I agree Ashlee!
Message has been deleted

Ashlee ryals

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 6:40:27 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I dont think they would have change the government to much just should have gave more power to government but I get what u are saying devonte

ryan thomas

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 9:03:22 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I agree with David because the colonies would had been more excited

Darnel Dubose

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 9:16:29 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
Okay David how would the colonies be happy and less conflicted?

Ashlee ryals

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 10:11:26 PM10/14/12
to carps-th...@googlegroups.com
I think david is saying that because they could all get what they want.... Therefore less con.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
This conversation is locked
You cannot reply and perform actions on locked conversations.
0 new messages