Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bharat Khakhria, Reform Nomination Candidate

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam Abdullahi

unread,
Jan 13, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/13/97
to

PRESS RELEASE
Bharat (Bear) Khakhria Campaign Team
P.O.Box 32107
Ottawa, ON K2B 1A1
Phone: (613) 860-BEAR
http://chat.carleton.ca/~mwillis/bear

For immediate release

Bharat Khakhria, known simply as Bear, is a 21 year-old Carleton
University student who has recently announced his intention to seek the
Reform Party of Canada nomination in the riding of Ottawa-West Nepean.
Bear has been actively involved with the community for many years. He has
worked for the Reform club at Carleton as well as for various Indian
community groups and local charities. Bear has extensive work experience
in both the legal field and in starting his own consulting group.

Bear intends to use this volunteer and employment experience to help
further the Reform cause as their candidate nominee and as the Reform
Member of Parliament for the riding. The nomination date is March 6, 1997.

-The Bharat (Bear) Campaign Team

For more information,
please call (613) 860-BEAR,
e-mail:BEA...@freenet.hut.fi
or visit his WWW page at http://chat.carleton.ca/~mwillis/bear


Ian J. Mckenna

unread,
Jan 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/30/97
to

Selvin Mathew (sma...@chat.carleton.ca) writes:
> What a loud shit... Its' just another Stupid paki, trying to live
> the great white man dream... I guess reformers are jumping up and down
> since they have acquired 'cultural diversity' within their party.
>
>

I imagine that you are another stupid racist NDPer by your hateful rant
and your racist words. Well, no one has answered my Tommy Douglas
racist/intolerant question yet....why don't you?

Tarek Zommo

unread,
Jan 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/30/97
to

Selvin Mathew (sma...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:
> What a loud shit... Its' just another Stupid paki, trying to live
> the great white man dream... I guess reformers are jumping up and down
> since they have acquired 'cultural diversity' within their party.

Selvin Mathew, just another white trash idiot who can't spell that
Carleton lets in. The great white man dream. I think you should be
cautious in your use of racist labels and name calling, you might lose your
chat account, or even get kicked out of the school.

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Punji Panicker - Nuff Malayalee Styles -- DowN with Dj. JiTEN --
> Now in Active Retirement -- It Feels Great to Be Old --
> Bring on the White Girls -- I'm coming to the promised land --
> To join my Boys... Chris... Glen... Abraham... in the Soca-Land --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 100% - EX-HomeGrowN - In Retirement & Enjoying Every Minute --


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tarek Zommo
Carleton University
Email address: tzo...@chat.carleton.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Sean Maguire

unread,
Jan 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/30/97
to

Ian J. Mckenna (cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:

> Selvin Mathew (sma...@chat.carleton.ca) writes:
> > What a loud shit... Its' just another Stupid paki, trying to live
> > the great white man dream... I guess reformers are jumping up and down
> > since they have acquired 'cultural diversity' within their party.
> >
> >

> I imagine that you are another stupid racist NDPer by your hateful rant
> and your racist words.

Like I couldn't see this coming....

> Well, no one has answered my Tommy Douglas
> racist/intolerant question yet....why don't you?

[I know I'm going to regret this, but I'm bored so:]

Hmmmmm.....because he's dead? And 90+% of people who might have supported
this policy are also dead?

Just for the record, Ian , when did he make this statement (what year?)


A more current example of my point:

Did you know that the NDP once had a policy of nationalising banks?
Did you know it no longer has such a policy?

Would you now still start talking about the NDP as the party that wants to
nationalise banks?

If so, you'd be lying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean Maguire, B.A., M.A., M.A.
Email address: spma...@chat.carleton.ca
Web Page >>> http://chat.carleton.ca/~spmaguir

This has been a public service announcement brought to you by Kraft,
maker of Velveeta, America's best-loved petroleum-byproduct cheese
substitute. Nothing tastes more like Velveeta than Velveeta, except
more Velveeta, or really gross cheese.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Selvin Mathew

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

Tarek Zommo (tzo...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:

> Selvin Mathew (sma...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:
> > What a loud shit... Its' just another Stupid paki, trying to live
> > the great white man dream... I guess reformers are jumping up and down
> > since they have acquired 'cultural diversity' within their party.

> Selvin Mathew, just another white trash idiot who can't spell that


> Carleton lets in. The great white man dream. I think you should be
> cautious in your use of racist labels and name calling, you might lose your
> chat account, or even get kicked out of the school.

My friend.. and probably the person who complained to D.C.C.S... your
term 'white trash idiot' does me a great disservice. But, it is what
exemplifies the thinking of society today, specifically those disillusioned
with their identity. How would u ever come to the conclusion I was WHITE
and an NDP'er? Typical reform thinking.... looking at the spelling of my
name and coming up with mis-contrived conceptions. And as for racist labels
'white trash,'that appears to be name calling hypocrite. And as for my
above comments, they represent a cynical view. But hey.. Reform is a
'multicultural party.'

Power.

Chris Belway

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Sean Maguire (spma...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:
> Ian J. Mckenna (cc...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:


> > I imagine that you are another stupid racist NDPer by your hateful rant
> > and your racist words.

> Like I couldn't see this coming....

> > Well, no one has answered my Tommy Douglas
> > racist/intolerant question yet....why don't you?

> [I know I'm going to regret this, but I'm bored so:]

> Hmmmmm.....because he's dead? And 90+% of people who might have supported
> this policy are also dead?


The 5 federal NDP supporters proudly point to Uncle Tom as being the
father of medicare-seems he wasn't so benevolent in what he wanted the
medicare to be used for. I am sure the Seaman family line is grateful that
the challenged people were not sterilized.


> Just for the record, Ian , when did he make this statement (what year?)


> A more current example of my point:

> Did you know that the NDP once had a policy of nationalising banks?
> Did you know it no longer has such a policy?

> Would you now still start talking about the NDP as the party that wants to
> nationalise banks?

> If so, you'd be lying.


I think you're missing the point. You see, apart from the 5 federal NDP
supporters left, apart from their 9 member caucus, nobody seems to care-if
a tree falls in a forest, and NOBODY is around to hear it, does it make a
sound? Same dillemma with the federal NDP and their policies, as most
intelligent people dismiss them at the slightest mention.


C.


"I had far rather walk, as I do, in daily terror of eternity, than feel
that this was a children's game in which all the contestants would get
equally worthless prizes in the end."
-T.S.Eliot

Sean Maguire

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Chris Belway (cbe...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:

> > A more current example of my point:

> > Did you know that the NDP once had a policy of nationalising banks?
> > Did you know it no longer has such a policy?

> > Would you now still start talking about the NDP as the party that wants to
> > nationalise banks?

> > If so, you'd be lying.

> I think you're missing the point. You see, apart from the 5 federal NDP
> supporters left, apart from their 9 member caucus, nobody seems to care-if
> a tree falls in a forest, and NOBODY is around to hear it, does it make a
> sound? Same dillemma with the federal NDP and their policies, as most
> intelligent people dismiss them at the slightest mention.

If they're so irrelevant, why are you and Ian still kicking around here
making them look like nobody cares. If nobody really cared, you wouldn't
bother. For example, I don't hear you getting on the case of the Natural
Law Party......now there's a party that doesn't matter.

But let's talk releveance out there in the Canadian public....the last
Compas/Globe poll sez:

National:

LIB 47%
PC 14%
NDP 13%
BQ 13%
REF 11%

Since I know that you believe the Reform Party to be a viable alternative,
and they're at 11% (projected to 22 seats), and the NDP is at 13%,
(projected to 13 seats), who are you to say that a Party that is 2% ahead
of yours in natioanl polls is not viable?

> C.


> "I had far rather walk, as I do, in daily terror of eternity, than feel
> that this was a children's game in which all the contestants would get
> equally worthless prizes in the end."
> -T.S.Eliot

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean Maguire, M.P.A. Student

Chris Belway

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Sean Maguire (spma...@chat.carleton.ca) writes:
> Chris Belway (cbe...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote:
>
>> > A more current example of my point:
>
>> > Did you know that the NDP once had a policy of nationalising banks?
>> > Did you know it no longer has such a policy?
>
>> > Would you now still start talking about the NDP as the party that wants to
>> > nationalise banks?
>
>> > If so, you'd be lying.
>
>> I think you're missing the point. You see, apart from the 5 federal NDP
>> supporters left, apart from their 9 member caucus, nobody seems to care-if
>> a tree falls in a forest, and NOBODY is around to hear it, does it make a
>> sound? Same dillemma with the federal NDP and their policies, as most
>> intelligent people dismiss them at the slightest mention.
>
> If they're so irrelevant, why are you and Ian still kicking around here
> making them look like nobody cares. If nobody really cared, you wouldn't
> bother. For example, I don't hear you getting on the case of the Natural
> Law Party......now there's a party that doesn't matter.


I cannot speak for Ian, but I do post a whole lot less than he does on
Usenet, period. However, it is possible to post and not care-ever see
"Quest for the Holy Grail?" Ever see the part with the Black Knight where
he wants to keep on fighting? Well, the funny part is, everybody else but
the black knight knows that he is impotent and couldn't hurt a fly-and
that is the reason why it is funny. Same thing with the odd poke at the
NDP-sure, the 5 federal NDP supporters try to put up a brave front, but it
makes no difference whatsoever, as they are a spent force. Thanks so much
for your affect on the federal party, former premier Bob.

>
> But let's talk releveance out there in the Canadian public....the last
> Compas/Globe poll sez:
>
> National:
>
> LIB 47%
> PC 14%
> NDP 13%
> BQ 13%
> REF 11%
>
> Since I know that you believe the Reform Party to be a viable alternative,
> and they're at 11% (projected to 22 seats), and the NDP is at 13%,
> (projected to 13 seats), who are you to say that a Party that is 2% ahead
> of yours in natioanl polls is not viable?
>

Strange-in March 1993, Reform was down to 8% in the polls-and they came
out with almost 500% more representation than both the Tories and the
NDP-I guess that's the reason why I don't stay up at night worrying about
the latest poll.


C.


========================================================================
Steatopygias's 'R' Us. doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more
Daniel Seaman (dse...@chat.carleton.ca) wrote as best he could:
"Goo goo gaa gaa,"
========================================================================

0 new messages