 | | | | Links to recent scientific papers, web posts, upcoming events, job opportunities, podcasts, and event recordings, etc. on Carbon Dioxide Removal TechnologyWe monitor hundreds of sources every week and deliver the most important carbon removal developments in one curated briefing. If these updates save you time each week, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to support the work.Donate Get 20% off a group subscription JUMP TO SECTIONCOMMERCIAL NEWSPaebbl has been selected for an equity investment from the European Innovation Council to scale its carbon-storing building materials technology (Paebbl)Stack Carbon signed a multi-year offtake agreement with Wild Assets for tens of thousands of tonnes of durable carbon removals from its enhanced rock weathering project in Uganda (Argus Media)Apolownia raised €1 million in seed funding to scale mangrove restoration in Indonesia (EU Startup)Hitachi, MOL and Japan Airlines signed an MOU to conduct Japan’s first pilot test of carbon dioxide removal technology on Kume Island, Okinawa (MOL)Microsoft signed a long-term agreement with CREW Carbon to purchase up to 23,602 tonnes of durable carbon removals from wastewater alkalinity enhancement (Crew Carbon)Luxembourg launched its first carbon-capturing street in Differdange, using biochar-infused asphalt to store CO₂ and reduce road emissions (Lux Times)Deduci launched a US CDR portfolio with Isometric, featuring improved forest management, subsurface biomass storage and biochar projects. Procurement closes 30 September 2026 (Deduci)MetLife and Charm Industrial partnered to reduce wildfire risk by converting excess forest biomass into bio-oil and biochar for carbon removal (Met Life)Circular Solar began onboarding with Puro.earth to certify 1,000-year durable carbon removals from its Nanorock farms, combining solar power, CDR and recycled infrastructure (LinkedIn)Drax secured a UK Environment Agency permit variation for carbon capture and storage at its biomass power plant near Selby, advancing its proposed BECCS project (Gas World)EarthOptics and Cquester partnered to improve soil carbon measurement and monitoring at scale (Globe News Wire)Mombak delivered its first reforestation-based carbon removal credits to the Symbiosis Coalition, two years ahead of schedule (Reuters)Ucaneo opened Germany’s largest direct air capture plant in Berlin, with capacity to remove 150 tonnes of CO₂ annually (Nat Law Review)The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market has approved three new engineered carbon removal methodologies, allowing projects under BioCarbon Standard, Cercarbono and Plan Vivo to qualify for its Core Carbon Principles label (Business Green)Occidental’s Stratos DAC facility in West Texas is expected to begin operations by the end of 2026, with capacity to remove up to 500,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually (E&E News)Kita secured strategic investment from Tokio Marine Group to expand carbon-market insurance and risk assessment services (Yahoo)remove signed a pre-purchase agreement with Carbonway for permanent CO₂ mineralization in France (LinkedIn)Super Biochar launched the Super Biochar India Foundation to support soil restoration, water retention and crop yields for Indian smallholder farmers (Biochar Today)Isometric signed its first Chinese carbon removal projects with DeCarbon Tech, Tongao Greenchar and Vastwing Energy Technology, covering DAC and biochar (Isometric)Paebbl partnered with Prologis Ventures and JLL Foundation to accelerate the use of carbon-storing materials in the built environment (Paebbl)Isometric certified its first carbon removal project in Switzerland, with Bioenergie Frauenfeld generating 6,065 biochar certificates (LinkedIn)Share RESEARCH PAPERSAuthors: Yanzhao Yuan, Fenghao Duan, Yanjun Shen, Bailei Shi andChao ZhengSynopsis: Integrating ERW into the restoration of abandoned mountainous mines could simultaneously support ecosystem recovery and atmospheric CO₂ removal. The proposed framework combines physical restoration, acid–base neutralization, soil development and biological interactions, using waste rock as a reactive substrate. By improving soil conditions, supplying minerals such as calcium, magnesium and potassium, and promoting mineral carbonation, ERW could reduce restoration-related emissions while increasing carbon sequestration. The study provides a conceptual basis for future field testing and low-carbon mine rehabilitation.
Authors: Nathaniel Tarshish, Nadir Jeevanjee & Inez FungSynopsis: New analysis suggests that achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions could lead to substantial long-term cooling rather than simply stabilizing global temperatures. The researchers distinguish the traditional zero emissions commitment (ZEC), associated with stopping CO₂ emissions, from a policy-relevant net-zero emissions commitment (Net-ZEC), which accounts for multiple greenhouse gases and carbon removal. While historical CO₂ emissions imply little multi-century temperature change after cessation, modelling indicates that net-zero GHG scenarios could produce at least 0.6°C of cooling over subsequent centuries.
Authors: Todd C McDonnell, Justin G Coughlin, Christopher Clark, Lyla Taylor, Charles T DriscollSynopsis: This process-based modelling study provides the first detailed assessment of ERW as a carbon dioxide removal strategy across U.S. forests. Simulating a 40-tonne-per-hectare basalt application across 132 million hectares of manageable forest, researchers estimate a gross removal potential of 660 Mt CO₂e from one application. After accounting for supply-chain emissions, the net potential falls to 353 Mt CO₂e, equivalent to 35.3 Mt CO₂e annually over 10 years. The analysis also identifies potential forest-growth benefits from replenishing depleted nutrients.
Authors: Rui Xiao, Dale Prentice, Manas Sarkar, Aditya Kumar, Fabian Rosner, Narayanan Neithalath, Erika La Plante, Mathieu Bauchy & Gaurav SantSynopsis: Global analysis finds that ambient carbonation of concrete is unlikely to offset a significant share of emissions from cement production. Using thermodynamic and diffusion-based modelling within a Monte Carlo framework, the study estimates that concrete in service could absorb around 0.23 gigatonnes of CO₂ annually by 2030 under ambient conditions. This represents less than 10% of annual cement clinker emissions, indicating that natural carbonation provides only limited climate benefits. The findings reinforce the need for rapid industrial decarbonization and more effective carbon dioxide removal and mitigation strategies.
Authors: Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Muhammad RidwanSynopsis: An Ethiopia-focused assessment finds that CDR and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) could support the country’s transition toward net-zero while generating jobs and broader development benefits. Evaluating 10 technologies across nine regions, the study identifies economic barriers and a $1.92 billion financing gap but finds strong potential for CDR due to its permanence and carbon-removal performance. A 70:30 CDR–CCU portfolio is proposed, alongside phased investment, regulatory coordination and workforce reskilling to support an equitable transition.
Authors: Hitomi Eto, Shotaro Mori, Ken Oshiro, Shinichiro FujimoriSynopsis: Energy-system modelling indicates that the Paris Agreement’s 2°C goal could potentially be achieved without relying on large-scale CDR, but only through extensive indirect electrification. The analysis finds that rapidly expanding renewable generation and electrolyzers, alongside widespread hydrogen use and electrification, would be technically demanding. Limiting CDR would also raise total mitigation costs by about 20% over the twenty-first century. The findings suggest that CDR may not be indispensable if indirect electrification can be scaled across the energy system.
Authors: Graeme Taylor, Peter Wadhams, Thomas Goreau, Suzanne Reed, Heri Kuswanto, Daniele Visioni, Dennis GarritySynopsis: A risk-based approach to climate stabilisation is proposed in response to accelerating warming and the possibility that conventional mitigation and carbon removal may not act quickly enough to avoid dangerous tipping points. The authors introduce a comparative risk–risk framework that weighs the risks of climate interventions against those of continued warming. They suggest combining rapid decarbonisation and expanded carbon removal with carefully governed cooling interventions to address near-term warming, while emphasizing that intervention risks must be assessed alongside the growing consequences of delay.
Authors: Miseong Kim ∥ ; Seungin Lee ∥ ; Yugyeong Sung; Ingyu Park; Ah-Hyung Alissa Park; Youngjune ParkSynopsis: This research shows that tuning pore size can improve the performance of amine-based materials for DAC. Researchers tested two polyamines, TETA and TREN, at different loadings in SBA-15 supports with varying mesopore sizes. Higher amine loading generally increased CO₂ uptake, but efficiency and adsorption kinetics depended on both pore structure and amine type. Larger pores improved accessibility and kinetics at intermediate loading, while excessive loading caused crowding and transport limitations, particularly for branched TREN. The findings highlight pore-size optimization as a practical route to designing more effective DAC sorbents.
Authors: David Casini, Lorenzo Bettucci, David Chiaramonti, Efthymia Alexopoulou, Valentin Schlecht, Iris Lewandowski, Moritz Von CosselSynopsis: Biochar research finds that diverse biomass feedstocks can produce broadly comparable carbon-stability characteristics while retaining important differences in their functional properties. Nine industrial and cultivated wild plant species were processed through standardized slow pyrolysis at 550°C. Although biochar yields and H/C ratios varied only modestly, carbon content, ash levels, fixed carbon and surface area differed substantially. Trace-element concentrations were generally low relative to selected European regulatory limits. The findings support diversified biomass systems for scalable biochar-based carbon removal, while highlighting the need for mixture and scale-up studies.
Authors: Alexander Koh-Bell; Simon Rufer; Fabian J. Dickhardt; David J. Kim; Nikolaos Tsakiris; Michael P. Nitzsche; T. Alan Hatton; Kripa K. VaranasiSynopsis: A new electrochemical approach could improve the scalability of marine carbon dioxide removal by using a membrane-free pH-swing system based on bismuth electrodes. Researchers developed a flow-through cell with porous electrodes that increases reaction rates while maintaining efficient material use. The system achieved a tenfold increase in current density compared with previous work, reaching 20 mA/cm² at 0.7 V, and successfully extracted CO₂ from simulated and real seawater. Technoeconomic analysis indicates a potential 14% reduction in projected system costs.
Authors: Karina Anaya, Jubil Joy, Amit KumarSynopsis: This techno-economic study compares three energy configurations for producing methanol from atmospheric CO₂ by integrating DAC, alkaline water electrolysis and CO₂ hydrogenation. The analysis finds that an Allam-cycle configuration produces the most methanol, while high-temperature gas-cooled reactors eliminate fossil fuels and achieve the lowest cradle-to-gate emissions at −1.52 tCO₂/t-MeOH. However, this option has the highest energy consumption and costs. Across scenarios, methanol costs range from $590 to $1,413 per tonne, highlighting trade-offs between emissions, energy use and economics.
Authors: Mohammad Moosazadeh, Hamin Kim, Shadfar Davoodi, Wafa Suwaileh, Jinwoo ParkSynopsis: Integrating DAC with steam methane reforming (SMR) and methanol production can substantially increase carbon availability and methanol output, but creates new hydrogen and economic constraints. Four configurations were assessed using thermodynamic and techno-economic modelling, with DAC integration increasing methanol-related carbon throughput by 34.6–44.1%. However, rising CO₂ incorporation shifted the systems from hydrogen-surplus to hydrogen-deficient operation, requiring significant external hydrogen. The conventional SMR–methanol system remained the most profitable, showing that DAC integration must balance carbon capture, hydrogen supply, heat integration and costs.
Authors: Johannes Roland Scholz, Albrecht Fritze, Lukas Hoppe, Vera Susanne RotterSynopsis: A new open-source tool, bioDYM, is introduced to help researchers model complex carbon flows, stocks and processes over time for carbon management and CDR. Built on the ODYM framework, the software combines low-code modelling, custom carbon-transformation processes, Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis and scenario comparisons through an interactive dashboard. A German wheat-straw case study projects 8,817 Gg of carbon removed from the atmosphere by 2125, with long-term performance strongly influenced by carbon stability and product lifetimes.
Authors: Manuel Ruben, Bingbing Wei, Anabel von Jackowski, Jens Hefter, Torben Gentz, et al.Synopsis: Evidence from Arctic coastal sediments suggests that most ancient permafrost carbon eroded into the ocean remains buried rather than rapidly returning to the active carbon cycle. Studying sediments near Qikiqtaruk, Canada, researchers used dual carbon isotopes to trace the fate of permafrost-derived organic carbon and found that less than 10% of redeposited Pleistocene carbon was respired. The findings indicate that marine sediment burial may limit the immediate atmospheric impact of thawing permafrost, although highly reactive carbon fractions could degrade before or after deposition.
Authors: Yu Gu, Jia LiSynopsis: A large-scale computational screening study finds that nonlinear competitive adsorption of CO₂ and water can fundamentally change which metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) appear most promising for low-energy DAC. Screening 7,906 MOF structures showed that all 50 top-performing sorbents were identified only when nonlinear adsorption was modelled, with regeneration energies of 92–150 kJ/mol CO₂. CO₂ working capacity was the strongest predictor of regeneration energy, while conventional heat-of-adsorption thresholds and DFT interaction energies were less reliable, highlighting the need for process-relevant screening methods.
Authors: Yasser Alasker ,Mohamed Hechmi El Ouni &Nejib GhazouaniSynopsis: Review highlights how 3D-printed construction materials could combine carbon sequestration with thermal energy storage to reduce the environmental footprint of buildings. It examines low-carbon binders such as limestone calcined clay cement, geopolymers and reactive magnesium oxide, alongside carbonation approaches including CO₂ curing, CO₂ mixing and carbonated recycled aggregates. The review assesses impacts on printability, strength, durability and carbon uptake while exploring phase-change materials for thermal storage. It also identifies research gaps for developing multifunctional, energy-efficient construction composites.
Authors: Sonal Patil, Hrishikesh KhaladkarSynopsis: Bamboo emerges as a promising nature-based solution for addressing both soil erosion and climate change. This review finds that bamboo’s dense root systems can stabilize soils, reduce erosion and improve soil health, while its rapid biomass growth enables carbon storage in above-ground and below-ground biomass as well as soil organic carbon. Evidence across tropical, temperate and Himalayan ecosystems supports its environmental benefits. The authors call for sustainable cultivation, species optimization and region-specific planting strategies to maximize bamboo’s potential for soil conservation and climate mitigation.
Authors: Nor Syuriaty Jaafar, Norhuda Abdul Manaf, Noor Fatina Emelin Nor Fadzil, Nilay ShahSynopsis: Integrating biomass gasification with DAC could enable simultaneous carbon removal, waste valorization and energy supply for capture operations. Using Aspen Plus modelling, the study evaluates a BG-H₂P-DAC system that converts biomass waste into hydrogen while generating electricity and heat for DAC. Increasing monoethanolamine concentration from 10% to 40% reduced CO₂ capture efficiency. The integrated system achieved net electricity consumption of just 0.0293 MWh/t CO₂, with generated power fully offsetting DAC electricity needs, while thermal regeneration demand was 1.32 MWh/t CO₂.
Conceptual diagram of the ecological restoration technology based on enhanced rock weathering (Source)Limited remineralization of Arctic permafrost-derived organic carbon in nearshore marine sediments (Source)WEB POSTSAncient Arctic carbon is pouring into the sea, but the seabed captures most of it (Science Daily)The importance of ongoing project monitoring through to credit delivery (ClimeFi)July People Moves: New co-leads take over at DAC, forestry firms (QC Intel)EU ETS: what the proposed integration of carbon removal could mean for buyers (ClimeFi)Marine carbon removal technology that turns carbon dioxide in seawater into ‘stone’ for permanent storage (Phys.Org)FEATURE: Enhanced weathering needs “rock-solid MRV” to clear path to EU ETS (Carbon Pulse)Q&A: Germany prepares long-term strategy for carbon removals (Clean Energy Wire)Brussels model for integrating DACCS into EU ETS uses old data, claims expert (Carbon Pulse)Monitoring Europe’s forests in a changing climate (Nature Geoscience)Evolving permanence approach to mitigate carbon offset reversal risk (Reuters)Puro.earth Strengthens Certification And Demand Teams With Key Appointments (Carbon Herald)International Credits In The EU ETS: How The 2026 Review Bets On Flexibility And What It Means For CDR At Home And Abroad (Carbon Herald)Cadmium pollution may unexpectedly strengthen biochar carbon storage in soil (EurekAlert)Drax taking “measured approach” to carbon removals after Elimini scale-back (Carbon Pulse)As wildfires rage, it’s a moment for carbon removal technology to shine (The Globe & Mail)Investable Impact: Could Quality Carbon Credits Crack It? (Pamela Whitby)Deploying biomass carbon removal and storage responsibly (Frontier)Can Norwegian bedrock become the local CO₂ storage of the future and “magically” remove carbon? (Forskning)How carbon dioxide will be stored beneath the seabed (Stockholm Exergi)Permanence in the Carbon Crediting Market: Why the Stock–Flow Debate Misses the Point (NetZero Lab)Debunking common misconceptions about a Carbon Takeback Obligation (Illuminem)Why Wastewater Carbon Removal Matters for Oceans (Crew Carbon)The ocean needs an antacid (Terraset)Gevo more than doubles 2026 earnings outlook despite $177-mln Q2 loss (Carbon Pulse)World’s largest CDR facility slated for US operations in late 2026 (Carbon Pulse)Startup aims to turn Saudi Arabia into global hub for carbon removal (Alarabiya News)How carbon removal buyers can help restore Europe’s forests (Ecohz)Carbon Drawdown Initiative Touches 5-10% of the CDR Workforce. Here’s What That Means (Carbon Drawdown Initiative)REPORTSCementing California’s Future - Policy Recommendations for Decarbonizing California’s Cement Sector (Clean Air Task Force)Share UPCOMING EVENTSAugust 2026September 2026Developing Your Message | 16 September 2026 | OnlineCommunicating Risk | 07 October 2026 | OnlineEngaging with the Media | 28 October 2026 | Online
AGU26 Annual Meeting | 7–11 December 2026 | San Francisco, CA | Abstract Submission Deadline: 05 August 2026We have curated a “Carbon Removal Events Calendar.” Explore and stay informed about upcoming events, conferences, and webinars on Carbon Dioxide Removal technology. Sync specific events / all events to your default calendar to ensure you never miss out on important CDR updates. Carbon Removal Events Calendar Add our Carbon Removal Events Calendar to your default calendar in 2 ways:Sync specific event: Click the event → menu (≡) → Share → choose your calendar → Save.Or sync all events: Menu (≡) → Preferences → iCalendar Feeds → Copy URL → Add to your calendar settings → Subscribe.JOB OPPORTUNITIES“Yama is engineering the first Low-Concentration Carbon Capture platform designed to scale with the world’s hardest-to-abate emissions — the dilute streams that existing capture technologies can’t handle economically.”
“Octavia Carbon builds and deploys Direct Air Carbon Capture (DACC) machines in Kenya, the world’s best place to do so.”
“CEEZER is the leading partner for Climate Performance Asset procurement and management, empowering organizations to transform climate ambition into a clear path to net-zero.”
“The CC Lab is a forward-thinking climate nonprofit based in New Haven, dedicated to scaling climate solutions by applying scientific, entrepreneurial, and investment expertise. Our current focus is on advancing the understanding and adoption of high-potential climate interventions, including methane measurement and mitigation, carbon dioxide removal and storage, and the recovery and destruction of potent greenhouse gasses.”
“Klimate is a science-led business with real experts guiding companies through the world of carbon removal and how they can safely invest in taking CO₂ out of the atmosphere.”
“To restore the 6 million acres already lost in the U.S. would take 50 years by traditional means. Mast is changing this trajectory.”
“Living Carbon is a public benefit company that transforms marginal land into high-value environmental assets.”
“Octavia Carbon builds and deploys Direct Air Carbon Capture (DACC) machines in Kenya, the world’s best place to do so.”
“Indigo Ag transforms on-farm regenerative agricultural practices into durable new revenue streams for farmers and agribusinesses, creating a more resilient world with thriving farmers and more sustainable and environmentally prosperous companies.”
“UNDO is one of the world’s leading carbon removal companies, and one of the four global winners of the $100M XPRIZE, further giving recognition and credibility to both enhanced rock weathering and UNDO as a world leader in this field.”
“Silicate is a terrestrial enhanced weathering company accelerating a natural geological process—the weathering of minerals—to durably sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide and amend soil pH in farmland.”
“8 Rivers is a Durham, NC firm focused on the invention, development, and commercialization of sustainable, infrastructure-scale solutions to global problems through impactful technologies.”
“AlliedOffsets is the world’s largest database and market intelligence provider for the voluntary carbon market. Built on the belief that reliable data drives real climate impact, we provide verified data, analytics, and insights that make carbon markets simpler and reliable.”
Looking for your dream job in CDR? There are 591 jobs available *right now*: check them all out at: PODCASTS“Host Dave Schlom explores the world of biochar and ways to remove carbon from the landscape with Pyrolysis engineer Joe Polin and policy expert Nora Cohen Brown from Charm Industrial.The San Francisco-based company has a research and development operation in Colorado that is pioneering a method to take biomass from farms and forest litter, turn it into biochar through the process of pyrolysis.Charm is taking that biochar and turning it into an oil that can then be injected into old oil wells to remove it permanently from the biogeochemical cycle. It’s a promising solution for getting carbon off the landscape and fighting the deleterious effects of human-caused climate change.”
“When CO2 enters the ocean it has to cross the air-sea interface. This is surprisingly slow! And, thankfully reasonably well understood due to scientists like Prof. David Ho. In this episode, I talk with David about the flux of CO2 between the atmosphere and the ocean. David assumed this would be a podcast about marine CO2 removal, which is why he uses its abbreviation “marine CDR” occasionally (sorry for the insufficient briefing David!) I had a minor sound carfuffle at the beginning and I had to cut a small part of the intro. We therefore start quite abruptly.”
“There are some people whom you know you just have to read whatever they write next. For me, one of those people is Poppy Russell.Poppy is the Research Manager at Counteract VC, a venture capital firm devoted to funding carbon dioxide removal companies. Poppy’s research of course helps Counteract diligence potential deals, and sometimes she publishes key insights, models, and other things that make me think.Listen in as Poppy and I discuss the state of carbon removal, what she’s bullish and bearish on, whether toxicity could be the next big thing in climate, and which corners she is peaking around next.”
“In this episode of The CDR Policy Scoop, Sebastian Manhart and Eve Tamme are joined by Mel Murphy, an independent geochemistry consultant, and Dirk Paessler, founder and CEO of Carbon Drawdown Initiative and Vice President of the Negative Emissions Platform, for a very special episode on how anyone actually knows enhanced rock weathering is working.Mel explains the two dominant measurement approaches, solid phase and aqueous pore water, and why they often tell different stories about the same field. Dirk brings the view from Carbon Drawdown Initiative’s own experiments: a field trial with no measurable signal, buried buckets that still show nothing after 1400 days, and a greenhouse programme now running hundreds of soil and rock combinations. The pattern that keeps surfacing is that results depend on the specific rock, soil, and method used.That uncertainty has not stopped the market. Over 20,000 credits have been certified across Brazil, the US, and India, even as Vera has declined to build a methodology, citing immature science. Mel unpacks Carbon Plan’s critique of credits from the US company Lithos, where an implied dissolution rate came out roughly ten times higher than a new peer reviewed estimate, and how registries like Isometric are adjusting requirements accordingly.The conversation closes on cost. Measurement now eats up 56 percent of enhanced rock weathering’s budget, the highest share of any removal method. Dirk and Mel discuss whether machine learning trained on greenhouse data and satellite based field mapping can bring that down, and why neither will commit to a timeline for readiness under something like the EU ETS.”
YOUTUBE VIDEOSIceland wants to turn CO₂ into stone to save the planet | Carbon Hunters | ENERGY OBSERVER “Season finale. After a year hunting for carbon capture solutions, the Energy Observer crew heads to Iceland to investigate two of the most ambitious carbon capture technologies on the planet.We visit Climeworks’ Mammoth plant, the world’s largest direct air capture facility, and follow Carbfix’s process turning captured CO₂ into solid basalt rock underground, while questioning the real cost and efficiency of direct air capture at scale. We also meet the scientists restoring Iceland’s drained wetlands, a nature-based carbon solution with its own trade-offs.”
The Unseen Agents of Climate Change | Ep269: David Kirchman | Cleaning Up Podcast “Microbes rarely feature in discussions about climate change, yet they play a central role in regulating greenhouse gases through the Earth’s carbon, methane and nitrogen cycles. As the climate changes, understanding these natural processes is becoming increasingly important to develop new approaches to clean energy, agriculture and emissions reduction.This week on Cleaning Up, Bryony Worthington speaks with Professor Emeritus David Kirchman of the University of Delaware, one of the world’s leading microbial ecologists and author of ‘Microbes: the Unseen Agents of Climate Change.’They explore how microbes drive the carbon, methane and nitrogen cycles, how climate change is reshaping ecosystems from permafrost to coral reefs, and how microbial science could help tackle the climate crisis, from microbial fuel cells and lower-emissions agriculture to biofuels, methane reduction and even emerging forms of carbon removal and geoengineering.”
Scaling Carbon Removal in Latin America With Isaac De León (Carbon Business Council) | Carbon Unbound “In this episode, we sit down with Isaac De León, Chair of the Latin America Carbon Removal Working Group at the Carbon Business Council, to unpack the landmark Latin America Carbon Removal Investment Roadmap.In this video, we cover:Breaking the Bottleneck: How to align buyers, banks, and developers to unlock early-stage capital.Regional Breakdown: Which country will scale first among Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Peru, and Chile?”
Biochar Farmer’s Manual - Turning the science into widespread profitable practice | International Biochar Initiative (IBI) “IBI welcomed our members, and ANZBIG members, to an exclusive event featuring Professor Stephen Joseph and Dr. Paul Taylor, who discussed the launch of their Farmers Guide and biochar for farmers.”
Rethinking Logistics for Effective Biochar Production | International Biochar Initiative (IBI) “In a members-only virtual session, IBI and the Latin American Biochar Institute explored the critical role logistics plays in biochar production, from sourcing raw materials to delivering the final product. Learn how optimizing logistics can improve production efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance sustainability practices. Industry experts from General Biochar Systems, including Luisa Marín, Yves Renfer, and Rafael Gamboa, will share strategies for managing supply chains, transportation logistics, and storage while adhering to regulatory standards.”
Biochar and Mine Reclamation: Cleaning Brownfields and Contaminated Water | International Biochar Initiative (IBI) “Around the world, there are an estimated one million abandoned mines, each site potentially creating extensive ground soil and water contamination.Moreover, contamination in these so-called “brownfields” can be deadly serious for surrounding communities due to the presence of leftover heavy metals, arsenic, sulfuric acid, and mercury, among other toxic sustances. Biochar is a powerful solution for mine remediation, one that can be made on-site from non-commercial forest biomass. Biochar cleans up brownfields, serving as a filter to capture contaminants in soil and water. When added to the soil, biochar also improves soil health and sequesters carbon, in addition to soil and water remediation.”
246 signatures on our letter to DOE! | Tito - AirMiners Weekly Carbon Removal Updates from 03 August - 09 August 2026 | Carbon Removal Updates Bulletin DEADLINESFollow us on:Twitter | Bluesky | LinkedIn | YouTube | Substack | Podcast 1 | Podcast 2
Support us here:Support This Newsletter Share Carbon Removal Updates Leave a comment © 2026 Carbon Removal Updates
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe 
| |
  |
|
