I suppose I should include a link to the, now defunct, Diogenes Institute website's quasi-spreadsheet macroengineering model to offset all US elex CO2:
Although Diogenes founder,
Charles Sinclair Smith, was going to meet with his college friend and then-Biden cabinet science secretary Eric Lander about this plan, I had to pull the plug on it because the approach produced
far more food than the entire world could consume even assuming US levels of protein
and even after passing through multiple trophic levels in agricultural feedstock.
The plan depended on macroengineering scale to leverage industrial learning curve cost reductions and a nation-wide CO2 network
approximated in this map with the green indicating a possibly international photosynthetic region to provide some jobs for residents of Mexico:

The scenario active at the time-stamped link I was preparing for Lander utilized off-peak generating capacity to produce NH3 that would be delivered in pipeline network parallel to the CO2. This produced even more CO2 hence even more algal biomass which is why I had to recommend against. This is also why I'm fairly confident that land-based agricultural CO2 emissions could be largely eliminated by ocean-based algae photobioreactors.
I should also mention that it took me a few years to find an algae cultivation technology that overcame the OPEX and CAPX problems dogging that approach for decades. But I found it and it relied on saline flotation medium for the less dense growth medium. The ocean provides this at the cost of wave barriers. It also provides sufficient heat buffering to avoid the cost of deep land-based lagoons. Finally, assuming the wave state is only
moderated rather than
eliminated it provides mixing action that otherwise must be provided by energy inputs (although the CAPEX of wave provision may still be necessary for time continuity of mixing).
