You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to canyonlands...@googlegroups.com
Mark Jacobson, professor of civil and
environmental engineering at Stanford University and director of
Stanford’s Atmosphere/Energy Program, assessed energy sources in terms of
their impacts on global warming, human health, energy security, water
supply, space requirements, wildlife, water pollution, reliability and
sustainability. The paper with his findings will be published in
the January, 2009, Energy and Environmental Science; I obtained it
online in December 2008. Jacobsen then assessed vehicular
transportation alternatives from best to worst against the same criteria
by assuming that the entire U.S. vehicular fleet was powered by each
energy source in turn, utilized in battery electric vehicles, hydrogen
fuel cell vehicles, or “flex-fuel” internal combustion vehicles than can
run either on petroleum or ethanol E85 fuel.
By Jacobson’s calculations, the best to worst vehicle options are: 1.
Battery electric vehicles charged from wind-generated electric power 2.
Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles fueled from wind-generated hydrogen 3.
Battery electric vehicles charged from concentrating solar power
plants 4.
Battery electric vehicles charged from geothermal power plants 5.
Battery electric vehicles charged from tidal power plants 6.
Battery electric vehicles charged from solar photovoltaic panels 7.
Battery electric vehicles charged from wave power plants 8.
Battery electric vehicles charged from hydroelectric power plants
9. A tie between battery electric vehicles charged from nuclear
or sequestered-carbon coal-fired power plants.
11. Flex-fuel vehicles burning E85 ethanol blend derived from
corn
12. Flex-fuel vehicles burning E85 ethanol derived from
cellulostic farmed source like switchgrass.
Jacobson found that battery electric vehicles require one third the
energy to travel a mile as do hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, when all
energy consumed in producing, delivering, and utilizing the traction
energy is totaled.
Jacobson notes that hydrogen fuel cell vehicles can be refueled rapidly
while battery electric vehicles cannot, and battery electric vehicles
have limited range on each charge. He recommends a battery/fuel
cell electric hybrid vehicle be developed which could run on battery
charge for commuting and shopping, but utilize hydrogen fuel for long
trip power. He sees hydrogen fuel cell vehicles being useful for
trips of over 250 miles, while battery electric vehicles could be used
for local commuting.