Fwd: Tariq Ali on Obama Victory

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Bobby Kunhu

unread,

Nov 17, 2008, 2:20:44 PM11/17/08

to Greenyouth, fourth-esta...@googlegroups.com, canopeners

GUARDIAN
Great expectations
The weight of the past, present and future 
will add drag to Obama's ascent to the White House
* Tariq Ali
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday November 5 2008 21.00 GMT

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/05/barackobama-uselections2
0087


Barack Obama's victory (mp3) marks a decisive generational and sociological
shift in American politics. Its impact is difficult to predict at this
stage, but the expectations of the majority of young people who propelled
Obama to victory remain high. It may not have been a landslide, but the vote
was large enough with the Democrats winning over 50% of the electorate (62.4
million voters) and planting a black family firmly in the White House.

The historic significance of this fact should not be underestimated.

It has happened in a country where the Ku Klux Klan once had millions of
members who waged a campaign of deadly terror against black citizens with
the support of a prejudiced legal system. How can one forget the photographs
of African-Americans during the first three decades of the last century
being lynched under the approving gaze of white families enjoying their
picnics as they watched - in Billie Holliday's memorable voice - "Black
bodies swinging in the southern breeze/Strange fruit hanging from the poplar
trees"?

It was the mass struggles for civil rights in the 1960s that forced
desegregation and the black voter registration campaigns, but also led to
the assassination of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X (just as he was
beginning to insist on the unity of blacks and whites against a system that
oppressed both). It would be trite to remark that Obama is not one of their
number. He is seen as such by the 96 per cent of Afro-Americans who spilled
out of their homes to vote for him. They may yet be disappointed but for the
moment they are rejoicing, and who can blame them.

It was barely two decades ago that Bill Clinton was warning his Democrat
rival, the liberal governor of New York State, Mario Cuomo, that America was
not yet ready to elect a president whose name ended with 'o' or 'i'. It was
only a few months ago that the Clintons were openly pandering to racism by
repeatedly stressing that white working-class voters would decisively reject
Obama and reminding Democrats that Jesse Jackson, too, had done well in past
primaries. The new generation of voters proved them wrong: 66% of those
between the ages of 18 and 29, comprising 18% of the electorate, voted for
Obama; 52% of the 30-44 age group (37% of the electorate) did likewise.

The crisis of deregulated, free-market capitalism led to a surge of support
for Obama in states hitherto regarded as Republican or white Democrat
territory, accelerating the process that defeated Bush/Cheney and the
neo-con gang. However the fact that McCain/Palin still obtained 55 million
votes is a reminder of how strong the American right remains. The Clintons,
Jo Biden, Nancy Pelosi and numerous other Democrat heavyweights will use
this to pressure Obama to remain loyal to the script he used to win the
election. But bland, feel-good slogans will not be enough to secure a second
term. The crisis is far too advanced and the questions agitating most
American citizens (as I discovered when I was there a few weeks ago) concern
jobs, health (40 million citizens have no health insurance) and homes.

Rhetoric alone is insufficient to deal with the slump in the real economy:
there is a trillion-dollar credit-card debt that could bring down other
banking giants; the decline of the car industry will lead to large-scale
unemployment. And there is the bail-out that has mortgaged future
generations of Americans to Wall Street. The panic measures of the Bush
administration designed and orchestrated by the banker's friend and treasury
secretary Paulson have privileged a few big banks that are being subsidised
by public money.

The Democrats and Obama agreed to the deals and will find it difficult to
draw back so that they can move forward on another front. The expanding
crisis, however, might compel them to move in a different direction.
Austerity measures always hurt the less privileged and how the new president
and his team deals with this will determine their future.

It is an awful time to be elected president, but it is also a challenge, and
Franklin Roosevelt accepted such a challenge in the 1930s by imposing a
social-democratic regime of regulation, public works and an imaginative
approach to popular culture. He was helped by the existence of a strong
labour movement and the American left: the Reagan-Clinton-Bush years helped
to destroy the legacy of the New Deal. It is a new economy, heavily
dependent on global finance and a deindustrialised America.

Does Obama have the vision or the strength to turn this clock back and
forward at the same time? In the realm of foreign policy, the Obama/Biden
approach has not been too different from that of Bush or McCain. A New Deal
for the rest of the world would require a rapid exit from Iraq and
Afghanistan and no further adventures in these regions or elsewhere. Biden
has virtually committed himself to a Balkanisation of Iraq, which now
appears less likely since the rest of the country as well as Iran and Turkey
are opposed, for different reasons, to the creation of an Israeli-American
protectorate in Northern Iraq with permanent US bases. Obama would be best
advised to announce a rapid and complete withdrawal. Apart from all else,
the costs are now prohibitive.

And sending troops based in Iraq to Afghanistan would only recreate the mess
elsewhere. As numerous British diplomatic, military and intelligence experts
have warned, the war in South Asia is lost. Washington is certainly aware of
this fact. Hence the panic-induced negotiations with the neo-Taliban. One
can only hope that Obama's foreign policy advisers will force a retreat on
this front as well.

What of South America? Surely Obama should mimic Nixon's trip to Beijing and
fly to Havana, ending the economic and diplomatic embargo of Cuba. Even
Colin Powell acknowledged that the regime had done a great deal for its
people. It will be difficult for Obama to preach the virtues of the
free-market, but the Cubans could certainly help him in establishing a
proper healthcare system in the United States. This would be change that
most Americans would be happy to believe in. Other lessons are also on offer
from other South American countries that foresaw the crisis of neoliberal
capitalism and began to restructure their economies over a decade ago.

If change means that nothing changes then those who have put Obama in the
White House might decide after a few years have passed that a progressive
party in the United States has become a necessity.

Peace Is Doable

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages

for human rights events send a blank email to invites-...@yahoogroups.com

check out all this and more at our website http://openspace.org.in

RESPECT ALL MEMBERS.
It is always okay to disagree.
It is never okay to disagree rudely.
You have a right to feel anyway you feel.
How you act on those feelings is what is important.
Treat all members with civility and respect.

and the big bad wolf says:

MARKETPLACE

From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Recent Activity