iReady Learning is a collection of high-quality instructional resources that help students learn and grow by accessing grade-level materials. Grounded in best-practice instructional design, these tools provide rigorous and motivating reading and mathematics instruction that:
The Ready program family consists of Ready Mathematics, Ready Reading, and Ready Writing. Each program provides teacher-led instruction and practice. They use a problem solving-based approach that builds conceptual understanding through reasoning, practice, and productive discussion around real-world scenarios. Check program pages for grade offerings by subject.
Math 180 Flex utilizes the student application to offer students systematic and explicit instruction via software with connections to careers and real-world application to accelerate toward grade-level proficiency by building foundational mathematical concepts needed for algebra readiness.
Into Math has been rated by EdReports as Meets Expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. The educator-led review identifies high-quality instructional materials that have an impact on learning. Read the full review at EdReports.org
Strategies used for reading intervention are often applied to mathematics with unintended consequences. Watch this edWebinar to make sense of strategies to facilitate math small-group instruction effectively to ensure more equitable practices, and to create a shared image of teacher and student behaviors through authentic videos of pulled small group instruction in mathematics.
The aim of Cupertino Union School District is to develop our young mathematicians to become powerful users of mathematics, sparked by their innate curiosity and wonder about the world. We strive to ensure that all of our learners build strong critical thinking, communication, collaboration, problem solving, and reasoning skills that are built on a deep understanding of numbers. Our learners make use of a variety of tools and practices to support their ability to problem solve in powerful ways, as they travel through our grade levels.
Mathematics instruction in Cupertino Union School District is guided by the California Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. This includes a combination of content standards as well as the standards for mathematical practices.
Topics Taught: Patterns, Multiple Representations Portions Web (fraction, percent, decimal), Probability, Arithmetic Strategies, Area, Perimeter, Integers, Variables and Ratios, Multiplying Fractions and Area, Division, Building Expressions, Rates and Operations, Statistics and Multiplication Equations, Volume, Percents, Fractions and Integer Addition, Problem Solving.
Topics Taught: Introduction to Probability, Fraction and Integer Addition, Arithmetic Properties, Proportions and Expression, Multiple Representations Web (graph, table, equation), Probability, Solving Word Problems, Solving Inequalities and Equations, Proportions, Percent, Statistics, Angle Relationships, Circles, Volume
Topics Taught: Problem Solving, Simplifying with Variables, Solving Inequalities and Equations, Graphs and Equations, Multiple Representations Web (graph, table, equation), Systems of Equations, Proportions and Percent, Statistics, Angle Relationships, Circles and Volume, Transformations and Similarity, Slope and Association, Exponents and Functions, Angles and the Pythagorean Theorem, Surface Area and Volume.
Topics: Slope and Association, Exponents and Functions, Angles and the Pythagorean Theorem, Surface Area and Volume, Functions, Linear Representations, Simplifying and Solving Equations, Systems of Equations, Sequences, Modeling Two-Variable Data, Exponential Functions, Quadratic Functions, Solving Quadratics and Inequalities, Solving Complex Equations, Functions and Data
Topics: Problem Solving, Simplifying with Variables, Graphs and Equations, Multiple Representations, Systems of Equations, Transformations and Similarity, Slope and Association, Exponents and Functions, Angles and the Pythagorean Theorem, Surface Area and Volume
Prerequisite: Students must complete a year long Algebra course at a CUSD School or Similar LEA. The expectation is that Geometry students are proficient in Algebra skills as they will continue to be utilized; in particular, simplifying expressions, solving equations and systems of equations, writing linear equations, and factoring quadratics.
Topics: Shapes and Transformations, Angles and Measurements, Justification and Similarity, Trigonometry and Probability, Completing the Triangle, Congruent Triangles, Proof and Quadrilaterals, Polygons and Circles, Solids and Constructions, Circles and Conditional Probability, Solids and Circles, Conics and Closure
The i-Ready diagnostic is one of multiple measures that will be used to determine final math placement for the fall. It is a very useful tool to help determine if your child is ready for a more accelerated path. However, in-class performance is also taken into consideration. If a child receives a C-, D, or F in their current course, i-Ready scores will not be used to determine a more accelerated path. Conversely, if your child is doing well in their current math course, i-Ready scores will not be used to determine placement in a less accelerated course (with the exception of 7/8 Algebra). It will be important to fill gaps in learning that are identified by the i-Ready diagnostic test, so that your child can thrive in mathematics, regardless of the course placement.
We encourage students to complete lessons in the MyPath Instructional Platform for at least 40 minutes a week to fill in gaps and/or to learn skills beyond their current math course if they desire a more accelerated pathway.
This school year Fairfax County Public Schools, the 10th largest school division in the United States, adopted the iReady assessment as a universal screener across all of its elementary schools. Students in grades K-6 take these assessments individually on the computer three times per year, and the results are made available to both teachers and parents.
While I have found this assessment deeply troubling all year, it has taken me a while to be able to articulate exactly why I think this assessment is so dangerous, and why I think we need to use our voices as teachers, administrators and parents to speak out against it.*
After a student takes the iReady screener in the area of mathematics, the teacher can download individual and class reports. Each child receives an overall scale score for the math assessment as a whole, as well as a scale score in each of the four domains of 1) number and operations, 2) algebra and algebraic thinking, 3) measurement and data, and 4) geometry.
The teacher can never see the questions the child answered correctly or incorrectly, nor can she even access a description of the kinds of questions the child answered correctly or incorrectly. The most a teacher will ever know is that a child scored poorly, for example, in number and operations. Folks, that is a giant category, and far too broad to be actionable.
When I started working for Fairfax County Public Schools twelve years ago I knew very little about math or how children learn math. But I was lucky to end up in a district that invests in teachers. I had amazing math coaches (who inspired me to become a math coach!) and support from the Title I office, I took courses in Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) and Developing Mathematical Ideas (DMI), learned how to use the Investigations curriculum well, and wrote a book about nurturing young mathematicians through small group instruction. I say this to point out that tremendous resources were poured into me (and many others!) as a classroom teacher and a coach to help me learn to listen to students and teach and assess responsively.
God Bless You for caring enough about the students who are falling through the cracks and suffering to the effects repetitive and constant regurgitation IReady is causing these kids to review lessons they may not even be ending review in. Therefore, these students are missing the review time they are actually needing more of because of mis guidance from Iready!!
I appreciate your candor and was wondering if you ever tried Math Running Records by Dr. Nicki Newton ( I believe that is the correct last name). Anyways, I have been trying to formulate a plan to convince my principal that we need to do this at our school to start a math RTI. What are your thoughts? Do you have a solution to assessing differently to help students become stronger mathematicians?
Thank you, Alison
What concerns me a great deal about adopting published schemes is the failure to recognise the importance of the emotional aspects of learning and the sets of relationships between:
students & mathematics (S/M), teachers & mathematics (T/M), and teachers & students (T/S). Classrooms are emotional places and whilst the S/M relationship is central the teacher can only impact on this through a combination of T/M with T/S. After all the teacher cannot DO the learning for the students!
Also, I agree that Kassia leaving us is a HUGE loss for our county! But, she is so gifted and has so much to teach not just students from our county, but nationally and internationally through her writing and research. You will be missed, Kassia. ?
Very well written post. I appreciate your passion for thinking and learning in the true context. I am curious, where you are going next? Who will see your post that needs to? What the school district will do to keep the child in focus instead of the product because it looks good on paper?
3a8082e126