Sorry if I already sent these, but it looks like the Google group doesn’t like my Kamloops Makerspace email yet.
Response 1:
In BC, the society act prevents the payment of anyone on the board of directors for these services. The day to day operations are what are board does in practice, but this does not need to be the case. We could have a paid administrator, but can’t afford it and choose not to.
We are working on a grant app for a project with a local science education centre that could return a chunk of funding for curriculum dev stuff. We currently have a bunch of members that do educational work in the community, and occasionally bring groups into the space. What we tend to do now is individual members will donate to the space to bring people in, but we do not have set rates. If we get the funding, then we will first develop a framework for developing curriculum around the educational projects that they already do. Once they deliver a package to teach the project it will trigger an honorarium payout, and allow access to a budget for equipment and materials related to teaching the project. We plan to release the framework (developed in coordination w/ local teachers) and all of the curriculum content produced under a CC license. Same program will also be asking for some travel funding to visit local communities.
We don’t trade memberships for services, technically. We have just gone from a two-tier $50 drop-in $100 key holder system, to a single $75 rate for everyone (key included). Selling the $50 wasn’t too hard, but retention was a problem due to lack of consistent open hours for drop-ins. There were a couple drop-ins with keys, but the deals were worked out mostly on a verbal basis with past boards etc. Plan is to go with the new rate, with a provision that we can discount memberships on an individual basis, with the sign-off of a couple board members. The stated expectation is that this is for members contributing to the community around the space, and while we do need money to operate, there are also a lot of other things they can do to help with the success of the space…
Response 2:
From an egalitarian perspective, it can be argued that charging everyone the same rate regardless of their ability to pay, is incredibly unfair. People that argue on both sides of a flat tax rate for the entire population (regardless of income) will call themselves egalitarian. This issue parallels that.
If you wanted the ability to discount memberships, you can make the argument that access to tools and the ability to learn skills will help remove economic inequalities, and help to decentralize power, which could be perceived as making everyone more equal. It depends if your definition of of equality stops at the dollar or is broad enough to include socioeconomic considerations.
@kulps said ”Quantifying volunteer effort is a fools errand.” I disagree here. Not with any of the sub bulletins that he raises, they are all valid considerations, but with the overall idea that we should be quantifying volunteer hours. I just added up all of the volunteering that goes into our hack nights as either “unskilled” labour ($10/hr) giving tours, or “skilled” labour ($20/hr) for project support, and the results were astounding. The unit rates come from BC lotteries, and are frankly extremely low. The bottom line was still shocking in terms of what we deliver to the community. I was using these numbers to apply for funding, which is something that more of us should probably do, but it can be daunting. Having a sheet to track volunteer hours is a great idea, and it can be as easy as saying “did that require someone with skills”, such as a drywaller.
Makerspace’s provide an incredible amount of social benefit, and there are MANY sources of funding for groups that provide social benefit. Keeping a simple list of all the shit that we do makes it a lot easier to access this funding.
I will agree that I am TOTALLY unwilling to try and quantify a persons effort in terms of negotiating a discount on their membership. But while giving a discount (that would probably happen either way), I am happy to make the implication that the person should feel compelled to make up the difference in another way that they can afford, and leave it up to them to figure out. If someone is obviously abusing our goodwill, then we can deal with it with the old verbal>written>consequences.
kile
Kamloops Makerspace