Larry
> I would like to begin a debate about Canadian Confederation. I believe that
> the strongest factor that pushed the Province of Canada and the Atlantic
> colonies toward Union was the threat of American Expansionism. I believe
> that the founding fathers of Confederation were scared that the Americans
> would annex Canada after the Civil war ended because they were upset with
> Great Britain.
Well, I don't think this was an unrealized threat-- the Americans had a
pretty serious arsenal of weapons-- including some of the very first
repeating rifles. But, part of this move towards confederation was a
railway-- this railway would play both a role in defense (improved
mobilization) but more importantly, it was the internet of the 19th
century-- that is, it was the "thing" that everyone had to have to be
progressive, or seen as "up to date." Ultimately, the railway would
prove to do neither for the Atlantic region.
> The fathers of
> Conferedation in my opinion were also fearful that they would lose their
> influence over the colonies if the Americans annexed British North America.
> I realize that the other pressures that existed in this time period all
> contributed to the formation of Canada, but I feel it was the threat of
> becoming Americanized which was the final catalyst that was needed to unite
> Canada.
You forget to account for the severe debt problems tha tthe Atlantic
Provinces were suffering from. Being attacked by another country is
always a possibility, but garnering support is usually done by economic
means-- Don't forget that the provinces had responsible government by
this time-- nothing was going to happen unless the people wanted it (or
were convinced they wanted it). Although I agree that the United States
was a factor in Canadian Confederation, the ultimate success of Canadian
Confederation was the promise of improved economy through railways, tarrif
protection and
industrialization-- many Atlantic Canadians felt (and probably rightly
so, although it was executed poorly) that economic diversitfication was
the only way to pull out of a dying staple economy, that depended too
heavily on foreign markets.
> To this day we fight a losing battle with the United States,
> instead of a geographical annexation, they have annexed our culture and
> replaced it with everything American. It has been a slow battle, but they
> are winnning.
This last line is a bit too ideological to contend with--
Americans do have economic
influence, the ability to manage corporations on our soil (leaving them
quite a lot of power to earn cash and achieve provincial subsidies), and
diplomatically, Canada (and therefore Atlantic Canada) will likely do just
about anything the US wants in terms of military aid.
But let's talk about Nova Scotia culture, for example. Supposedly we're
supposed to have this high Scottish influence that makes us so unique.
Stange thing about it, though, "Tartanism" was the creation of wonderful
Premier Agnus L. Macdonald for the creation of tourism, even though the
population contained only about 15% Scots. As a matter of fact, you
could probably count an equvalent number of American ancestors at the same
time (Irish would have been the largest percentage of the population).
Furthermore, it's kind of ironic to complain about being attacked
culturally by the Americans, when Atlantic Canadians have done their share
of cultural attacking in history. (ever hear of the Mi'kmaq,
Beothuk, Acadian, Maliseets etc. etc. etc.?)
Ryan. . .
Ryan Deschamps
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~greebie/Profile.html - Personal Profile
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~greebie/cinquain.html - Poetry Page
J. Baxter wrote in message ...
You make some very good points, I really like the point that you have made
about the economic diversity of the Atlantic colonies. The point about
diversifying economies to get out of the severe economic problems that they
were faced with was well made. I think that this is still difficulty for
many regions in Canada today. The country has always been a supplier of
natural resources to countries that actually manufacture things.
I think the railway is also a major factor for confederation. It is
obvious that better communications were needed in the colonies because of
the geographic diversity of British North America. Unfortunately the
railways weren't all they were cracked up to be and they added to the debt
of the colonies. It is also interesting that the railway in the British
North American colonies were also used for troop movement between the
colonies. I find this interesting because the railway that went from coast
to coast in the latter part of the century was used to transport North West
Mounted Police so they could keep the peace among the settlers and the
natives and to also discourage American expansion.
I like your point as well about Canadians annexing cultures within our
culture. I totally agree with you about the terrible way we treated the
native people of this country. The policy of assimilation was a terrible
idea and has caused severe problems for the native population in Canada. I
don't think we could ever heal the scars that we have left with Canada's
first peoples.
Larry
>On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 lshe...@telusplanet.net wrote:
>
>> I would like to begin a debate about Canadian Confederation. I believe
that
>> the strongest factor that pushed the Province of Canada and the Atlantic