Comrade Trump

[TomP]

Trump stated during the debate that he will appoint a special
prosecutor to arrest Hillary if he becomes president.
Democratic countries don't go on a witch-hunt to arrest their
political rivals! That is what dictatorships do.
Putin will be proud of his American admirer.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

[E. Barry Bruyea]

On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:41:45 -0500, TomP <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

>Trump stated during the debate that he will appoint a special
>prosecutor to arrest Hillary if he becomes president.
>Democratic countries don't go on a witch-hunt to arrest their
>political rivals! That is what dictatorships do.
>Putin will be proud of his American admirer.

Hillory missed a golden opportunity to point out that Trump was
emulating his hero, Putin.

>
>--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
>

>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Topaz]

On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:41:45 -0500, TomP <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

>Putin will be proud of his American admirer.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/

From Russia, to Turkey, to Egypt, to India, to China -- more and more
governments have grown wise to the treason of the CIA-NGO "human
rights" TM activists in their midst. Whereas most of the other
NGO-infected nations are now using harassment, firings and expulsions
to contain the cancer, Chinese strongman Xi Jinping's gang is holding
televised trials and meting out prison sentences. You go Xi! Oh if
only we could have locked up America's leading libtards during the
McCarthy days of the 1950's. What a wonderful country we would have
today.


After being expelled from China in 2012, Chris Buckley then set up
shop in CIA-infested Hong Kong. Buckley has since re-planted himself
in Beijing, where his sole task with the Slimes is to libel and
slander China. Hopefully, Xi will bounce his butt from the mainland
again, where the Slimes publication itself is already banned.


Buckley: Chinese lawyers and rights activists ...
Translation: CIA assets.

Buckley: appeared in televised trials throughout this week in what
seemed to be a new, more public phase of President Xi Jinping's
campaign to cleanse the country of liberal ideas and activism.

Buckley: Legal experts and supporters of four defendants denounced the
hearings...

Translation: Traitors and libtards denounced the hearings...

Human Rights Watch is based in New York City and massively funded
by George Soros.

Buckley: Chinese state-managed newspapers, television programs and
websites used the trials to offer a daily torrent of damning words
against Western influence and liberal political ideas.

Good!


From funding Obongo, Killary and Black Lives Matter in the USA, to
NGO's found in all the continents of the world, the Soros "human
rights" TM network has it tentacles everywhere!


Buckley: This week's trials were accompanied by newspaper editorials
and several videos amplifying the party's message that China is the
target of conspiratorial subversion, backed by Western capitals or
even planned by them. It calls such efforts "color revolutions," a
term taken from upheavals in former Soviet states.

The Chinese "newspaper editorials and videos" have nailed it! These
are indeed CIA attempts at "Color Revolutions" -- subversive
activities which Sulzberger's Slimes is a part of.

"The Western forces represented by America often wield the banner of
'democracy, liberty and rule of law' to create social conflict in
targeted countries, with the intention of overthrowing governments,"
one documentary said.

"The central government under the leadership of the party is crystal
clear about the dangers of 'color revolution,' " it said. But, it
added, "We are extremely confident that China will not become the next
Soviet Union."

The prosecutors dwelled on a meeting that the four men and others had
attended at a restaurant in Beijing in February 2015. According to a
recording they cited, Mr. Hu told the gathering that their goal was to
ignite protests leading to "even bigger clashes producing bloodshed,
causing social turmoil that will give the international community an
excuse to become involved."


China's hard crack-down on Globalist subversion is "the good news."
The "bad news" is, as previously stated, when Color Revolutions fail,
war on the target nation follows.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[simplicity]

On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 3:57:41 AM UTC-6, E. Barry Bruyea wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:41:45 -0500, TomP <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >Trump stated during the debate that he will appoint a special
> >prosecutor to arrest Hillary if he becomes president.
> >Democratic countries don't go on a witch-hunt to arrest their
> >political rivals! That is what dictatorships do.
> >Putin will be proud of his American admirer.
>
> Hillory missed a golden opportunity to point out that Trump was
> emulating his hero, Putin.

Oh, so few weeks ago he was like "hitler", now he is like "putin".

You really have nothing of substance on him.

[Greg Carr]

Die Topaz you stupid goof.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"simplicity" wrote in message
news:05f5a407-18eb-4b72...@googlegroups.com...

> Oh, so few weeks ago he was like "hitler", now he is like "putin".

Last night he said he would order his Attorney General to name a Special
Prosecutor with the objective of jailing Clinton.

Literally included in part 5 of Article 2 of the Articles of Impeachment
adopted against Nixon:

"In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power
by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate
Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central
Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be
faithfully executed.:

> You really have nothing of substance on him.

There is really nothing of substance to him.

[simplicity]

On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 3:28:14 PM UTC-6, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
> "simplicity" wrote in message
> news:05f5a407-18eb-4b72...@googlegroups.com...
>
> > Oh, so few weeks ago he was like "hitler", now he is like "putin".
>
> Last night he said he would order his Attorney General to name a Special
> Prosecutor with the objective of jailing Clinton.

With the objective "to look into Clinton's situation", to be exact. Not jailing her.

Why are you repeating the blatant lies of CNN, MSNBC and Canadian Brainwashing Cabal?

Lies after lies, after lies. Destroyed material that might become the evidence. 39 instances of sudden amnesia by Clinton. 5 immunity deals. It is all nothing for you because you are solely driven by ideological bias.

I might understand it if you has something to gain from supporting Clinton. Well, tiny probability that you actually do, overwhelming chances are you will gain absolutely nothing. Nothing at all. So, MIW, perhaps it is the time to smarten up.

>
> Literally included in part 5 of Article 2 of the Articles of Impeachment
> adopted against Nixon:
>
> "In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power
> by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate
> Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central
> Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be
> faithfully executed.:

This is plain stupid. There is no parallel between the above and what Trump said yesterday. In fact, it is totally opposite.

>
> > You really have nothing of substance on him.
>
> There is really nothing of substance to him.

Another false platitude you repeat after CNN.

Taxes. Immigration. Russia. Middle East. Obama care. NAFTA and TPP. Inner cities. You may like it or not - this is for another discussion, but this IS the substance, tons of substance for anybody who is not driven by ideological bias.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"simplicity" wrote in message
news:0a1d1fa9-a04c-43db...@googlegroups.com...

> On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 3:28:14 PM UTC-6, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
> > "simplicity" wrote in message
> > news:05f5a407-18eb-4b72...@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > Oh, so few weeks ago he was like "hitler", now he is like "putin".
> >
> > Last night he said he would order his Attorney General to name a Special
> > Prosecutor with the objective of jailing Clinton.
>
> With the objective "to look into Clinton's situation", to be exact. Not
> jailing her.

Regardless, the act of ordering the AG to name a Special Prosecutor would be
an impeachable offence.

> I might understand it if you has something to gain from supporting
> Clinton. Well, tiny probability that you actually do, overwhelming chances
> are you will gain absolutely nothing. Nothing at all. So, MIW, perhaps it
> is the time to smarten up.

I'm no great fan of Hillary, except when compared to the alternative. I
like how P.J. O'Rourke put it:

"I have a little announcement to make ... I'm voting for Hillary. I am
endorsing Hillary. I am endorsing Hillary, and all her lies and all her
empty promises. It's the second-worst thing that can happen to this country,
but she's way behind in second place. She's wrong about absolutely
everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

> > Literally included in part 5 of Article 2 of the Articles of Impeachment
> > adopted against Nixon:
> >
> > "In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive
> > power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including
> > the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the
> > Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of
> > Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty
> > to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.:

> This is plain stupid. There is no parallel between the above and what
> Trump said yesterday. In fact, it is totally opposite.

"In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power

by interfering with agencies of the executive branch ... the Criminal
Division ... of the Department of Justice"

> > > You really have nothing of substance on him.
> >
> > There is really nothing of substance to him.
>
> Another false platitude you repeat after CNN.

Really? Made that one up myself.

It doesn't matter now ... he's toast ... one poll has him down by double
digits, and he's underwater on net approval by 34 points (compared to -10
for Hillary) and there's more opposition research to come.

And a most terrifying name has come up: Gloria Allred, who says she's been
“contacted by women who allege inappropriate contact by Mr. Trump.”

> Taxes. Immigration. Russia. Middle East. Obama care. NAFTA and TPP. Inner
> cities. You may like it or not - this is for another discussion, but this
> IS the substance, tons of substance for anybody who is not driven by
> ideological bias.

His platform doesn't matter if he's unfit for office, and I think he's
unfit.

[E. Barry Bruyea]

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:28:11 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com>
wrote:

And emulating his hero, Putin, sure as hell doesn't say much for
either his character or intellect.

[simplicity]

On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 10:03:00 PM UTC-6, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
> "simplicity" wrote in message

> news:0a1d1fa9-a04c-43db...@googlegroups.com...

>
> > > Last night he said he would order his Attorney General to name a Special
> > > Prosecutor with the objective of jailing Clinton.
> >
> > With the objective "to look into Clinton's situation", to be exact. Not
> > jailing her.
>
> Regardless, the act of ordering the AG to name a Special Prosecutor would be
> an impeachable offence.

Not "regardless". You twist the truth to fit your ideological bias.

And then you attempt to present it as "fact".

>
> > I might understand it if you has something to gain from supporting
> > Clinton. Well, tiny probability that you actually do, overwhelming chances
> > are you will gain absolutely nothing. Nothing at all. So, MIW, perhaps it
> > is the time to smarten up.
>
> I'm no great fan of Hillary, except when compared to the alternative. I
> like how P.J. O'Rourke put it:
>
> "I have a little announcement to make ... I'm voting for Hillary. I am
> endorsing Hillary. I am endorsing Hillary, and all her lies and all her
> empty promises. It's the second-worst thing that can happen to this country,
> but she's way behind in second place. She's wrong about absolutely
> everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

Yes, you know what to expect from her.

More stupidity. More sellout of the country to highest bidder for personal gain. More "Iran deals". More ISIS. Raising number of people on food stamps. More families with not a single member in the work force. Lowering participation in home ownership. All these Obama "legacies" she wants to continue.

But this is OK because the other candidate is "hitler", "stalin", "putin" and God only knows what else.

But, good heavens, we in Canada have done this a year ago, didn't we. We also elected a juvenile retard because the other candidate was like "hitler".

> > > Literally included in part 5 of Article 2 of the Articles of Impeachment
> > > adopted against Nixon:
> > >
> > > "In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive
> > > power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including
> > > the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the
> > > Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of
> > > Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty
> > > to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.:
>
> > This is plain stupid. There is no parallel between the above and what
> > Trump said yesterday. In fact, it is totally opposite.
>
> "In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power
> by interfering with agencies of the executive branch ... the Criminal
> Division ... of the Department of Justice"

Instructing is not interfering. Another attempt to twist the truth on your part.

> > > > You really have nothing of substance on him.
> > >
> > > There is really nothing of substance to him.
> >
> > Another false platitude you repeat after CNN.
>
> Really? Made that one up myself.

Well, then pack it in the envelope and send it to CNN. They will, no doubt, use it as another sensational news about Trump.

>
> It doesn't matter now ... he's toast ... one poll has him down by double
> digits, and he's underwater on net approval by 34 points (compared to -10
> for Hillary) and there's more opposition research to come.
>
> And a most terrifying name has come up: Gloria Allred, who says she's been
> “contacted by women who allege inappropriate contact by Mr. Trump.”
>
> > Taxes. Immigration. Russia. Middle East. Obama care. NAFTA and TPP. Inner
> > cities. You may like it or not - this is for another discussion, but this
> > IS the substance, tons of substance for anybody who is not driven by
> > ideological bias.
>
> His platform doesn't matter if he's unfit for office, and I think he's
> unfit.

So, first you say that he has "no substance". When you are proven wrong, you say that "his platform doesn't matter".

You know what "doesn't matter"? Any attempt to continue this subject with you.

10-4.

[Dhu on Gate]

I think the Donal' would agree with you.

The Job's too much work, and that's _not_ his style.

Dhu


--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
http://babayaga.neotext.ca/PublicKeys/Duncan_Patton_a_Campbell_pubkey.txt

[Dhu on Gate]