Re: Global warming science alarming..
Last Post
> From The BBC, 11/24/09:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8375576.stm
•• ROTFLMAO !!
The BEEB, home to islamo-fascist
and AGW alarmist propaganda 24/7/365
> Global warming science alarming, say climate experts
•• What does that really mean? It sounds to me
like AGW alarmist propaganda.
>
> Three UK groups studying climate change have issued a strong statement
> about the dangers of failing to cut emissions of greenhouse gases
> across the world.
•• Since it has been proved that "greenhouse
gases" have little or no impact on climate,
so what is the problem??
>
> The Royal Society, Met Office, and Natural Environment Research
> Council (Nerc) say the science of climate change is more alarming than
> ever.
•• The Royal Society, my oh my, has destroyed
its venerable reputation by publishing Mann
and Briffa's paper without the data necessary
for peer review. When a court ordered the
data produced, it proved to be a
"cherry-picked fraud.
•• Met office can't even forecast, with reasonable
accuracy, next weeks weather.
•• Natural Environment Research Council - well
the less said about it the better
> They say the 2007 UK floods, 2003 heatwave in Europe and recent
> droughts were consistent with emerging patterns.
•• While that is true, the authors claim that was
from warming, when in fact it is a harbinger
of the end of the interglacial period.
> Their comments came ahead of crunch UN climate talks in Copenhagen
> next month.
•• Nothing good and hopefully nothing bad is
going to happen in Copenhagen. Probably
nothing but some sanctimonious speeches
with booze and big cigars
> 'Loss of wildlife'
>
> In a statement calling for action to cut carbon emissions,
> institutions said evidence for "dangerous, long-term and potentially
> irreversible climate change" was growing.
•• Those boobs don't get it: "climate change"
IS irreversible
> Global carbon dioxide levels have continued to rise,
•• minimaly
> Arctic summer ice
> cover was lower in 2007 and 2008 than in the previous few decades,
•• Hogwash!!!
> the last decade has been the warmest on average for 150 years.
•• More Hogwash
> The best thing we could do is to prepare for the worst.
•• Those rubes have no clue. They will do
everything wrong
> Build better flood defences in vulnerable areas
•• What defences in what areas
> Persistent drought in Australia
•• Drought in Australia is only a sometimes thing
> and rising sea levels in the Maldives
•• There are no "rising sea levels"in the
Maldives despite its President's antics and
efforts to cash in.
> were further indicators of possible future patterns, they said.
•• Indeed they spoke wrong.
> They argue that without action there will be much larger changes in
> the coming decades, with the UK seeing higher food prices, ill health,
> more flooding and rising sea levels.
>
> Known or probable damage across the world includes ocean
> acidification, loss of rainforests, degradation of ecosystems and
> desertification, they said.
>
> In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned
> that the world faced more droughts, floods, loss of wildlife, rising
> seas and refugees.
>
> But Professor Julia Slingo, chief scientist of the Met Office,
> Professor Alan Thorpe, Nerc's chief executive, and Lord Rees,
> president of the Royal Society, said cutting emissions could
> substantially limit the severity of climate change.
>
•• These yo yo's should know that "cutting
emissions" will cut their own throats
> Prof Slingo said:
> "As the inter-governmental panel on climate change stated very clearly
> in 2007, without substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions we
> can likely, very likely, expect a world of increasing droughts,
> floods, species loss, rising seas [and] displaced human populations.
•• Everything in the IPCC #4 report has been
discredited from the temperature data to the
sea levels to the polar icecaps. Only the
propaganda is real.
— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena
Last Post
> But Professor Julia Slingo, chief scientist of the Met Office,
> Professor Alan Thorpe, Nerc's chief executive, and Lord Rees,
> president of the Royal Society, said cutting emissions could
> substantially limit the severity of climate change.
•• Prof Slingo, couldn't even get last summer's
weather right how can she claim ability to
direct a process that has operated in 100,000
year cycles for 500 million years or more.
•• Now Lord Rees whose eminence is sitting on a deck
of cards and whose bottom depends on whether or
not he is hauled into court for permitting the
unpermitable — publishing, without peer review,
Mike Mann and Keith Briffa's cherry picked cherry
trees.
•• Now Thorpe, Natural Environment Research
Council depends on IPCC and the fascist
governments to succeed or he is out of a cushy job
NERC will be no more. If he was really smart, he
would stay mum and out of sight, and sty out the
firing line — but he is not.