Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Did CA call storm troops to HoC?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

nkennedy

unread,
Mar 21, 2001, 12:56:01 PM3/21/01
to
I just witnessed print reporters being jostled ahd denied access to the
corridors of the house. The news report seemed to imply that the "rent a
cops" denying print reporters their legitimate access were hired by CA.
The reason for these fascist, strong arm tactics was to protect liar
Jaffir from answering ANY questions.
My! what an example of honest, open politics.
Where are you? You bits of shit that use so much of this space trying to
sell the selfishness of the CA? Why are you ALL hiding?

Neil K

Bruce Mills

unread,
Mar 21, 2001, 1:46:15 PM3/21/01
to
nkennedy (nken...@seascape.ns.ca) wrote:
: I just witnessed print reporters being jostled ahd denied access to the

: corridors of the house. The news report seemed to imply that the "rent a
: cops" denying print reporters their legitimate access were hired by CA.

How about some real "facts" not just spurious "implying" on the part of
the Lieberal biased media, who we know has no love for the Alliance.

: The reason for these fascist, strong arm tactics was to protect liar


: Jaffir from answering ANY questions.

How do you know this?

: My! what an example of honest, open politics.

My! What an example of leaping to conclusion. Typical of the Lieberal
mindset.

: Where are you? You bits of shit that use so much of this space trying to


: sell the selfishness of the CA? Why are you ALL hiding?

And these comments and ad hominem attacks are certainly designed to
generate meaningful discourse, aren't they?

Why are you hiding from the violation of the rules of Parliament by Anne
"get those guns" McLellan? I guess that's no big deal, right?

Bruce
---
The budget should be balanced;
the treasury should be refilled;
public debt should be reduced;
and the arrogance of public officials should be controlled."
- Cicero, 106-43 B. C.

nkennedy

unread,
Mar 21, 2001, 2:38:04 PM3/21/01
to
"...Why are you hiding from the violation of the rules of Parliament by
Anne
"get those guns" McLellan? I guess that's no big deal, right?"->Bruce
Mills

Bruce the reason I don't view the Liberals and CA with equal contempt is
because the Liberals don't display the same level of hypocrisy CA. But
to make it very simple:
Why is Gaffer ducking the media? Do honest people with nothing to
hide duck questions?
Up until now this bird never saw a camera that he didn't run to.

Neil K

Humble Wisdom

unread,
Mar 21, 2001, 9:52:21 PM3/21/01
to
nkennedy wrote:
>
> I just witnessed print reporters being jostled ahd denied access to the
> corridors of the house. The news report seemed to imply that the "rent a
> cops" denying print reporters their legitimate access were hired by CA.
> The reason for these fascist, strong arm tactics was to protect liar
> Jaffir from answering ANY questions.

By Jesus, you're an idiot.
The security people on Parliament Hill, uniformed or not, are all
controlled
by the Speaker's office.

Joe

unread,
Mar 22, 2001, 5:13:01 AM3/22/01
to

My favourite was Jaffer, later in the day, claiming he was not hiding from
the reporters. Anyone who saw the tape of the earlier incident knew that,
again, he lied.

It is interesting to note that Jaffer suffers from the 'Saint' Stockwell
disease. After the manure hit the fan over Stockwell's legal bills
Stockwell tired to tell the press that the matter was closed. Jaffer said
the same thing about his problems yesterday. Both may wish that these
matters were closed but the press will decide when asking questions about it
no longer makes sense.

A free press means that the press gets to decide which questions should be
asked and which matters pursued.

Sunnyjim

unread,
Mar 22, 2001, 12:56:43 PM3/22/01
to


Maybe Jaffer and all Hon. Members should follow Crouton's lead and
just strangle people. Or pepper spray them.

Steven C. Britton

unread,
Mar 22, 2001, 7:48:35 PM3/22/01
to
Sunnyjim wrote:

> Maybe Jaffer and all Hon. Members should follow Crouton's lead and
> just strangle people. Or pepper spray them.

... or just pay party hacks to burn a few crosses so Hedy doesn't turn out
to be the idiot she looks like today.

Humble Wisdom

unread,
Mar 22, 2001, 7:56:16 PM3/22/01
to
Joe wrote:
>
> A free press means that the press gets to decide which questions should be
> asked and which matters pursued.

Like they're pursuing Shawinigate, huh?
Imagine those dumbass clowns Chretien and Tobin
trying to say the case was closed! What a pair
of rubes!

Doug Craigen

unread,
Mar 22, 2001, 10:17:29 PM3/22/01
to
Joe wrote:
>
> A free press means that the press gets to decide which questions should be
> asked and which matters pursued.

Sometimes that is a good thing.

Sunnyjim

unread,
Mar 23, 2001, 2:13:39 PM3/23/01
to


Cynically, I expect to see something like this in the next week or so.
Some Liberal bum boy will find a tree stumpt that has been burned
somewhere in NCentral BC and pronounce it a burned cross.

Fry her ass out of the House.

>
>
>

0 new messages