Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ironically, U.S. War Against Islam Spreading Under Pacifist-Inclined Obama And Democrats

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Crap Detector

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 2:26:38 PM12/19/09
to
There is definite evidence of this. U.S. rockets recently hit jihadist
training camps in Yemen. Reports show
that anti-Americanism has increased recently in Pakistan with more
drone rocket attacks against jihadists
in Waziristan and north eastern Afghanistan. Civil wars in Somalia and
Sudan could result in jihadists
gaining control in those African countries.

Yesterday we leaned of incursions by Iranian forces into Iraq, a
development that could have disturbing effects for the Obama
government.

Obama thought that by stating Islam is a religion (actually it's more
an ideology and culture) of peace
would win the U.S. points in the Muslim world. But such has not been
the case. The recent Fort Hood massacre, the first domestic Muslim
terrorist attack since 9/11 has made many Americans more fearful
and insecure than under Bush. Promising to close Gitmo and now to
award high Muslim terrorist captives
civil trials in NYC has angered many American citizens but has not
gained Obama any brownie points among Muslims and liberal/ commies and
leftist fascists worldwide.

This was made clear by Venezuela's Marxist dictator of Hugo Chavez who
recently stated to the world that
Obama smells of (Satanic) sulphur, just like his predecessor George
Bush. During the 2008 election Democrats emphasized the idea that
Obama would improve America's image worldwide that had been
so badly tarnished by Bush. The ignorant leftist morons that said this
had obviously never heard of the 1950s
novel and movie, "The Ugly American". And Obama's election has not
changed that perception at all.

tenjets

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 2:44:20 PM12/19/09
to
What's wrong with you? You side with Chavez. You're happy with the
fact that Islamic jihadists hate Obama. You have nothing to offer.

Crap Detector

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 4:56:56 PM12/19/09
to
On Dec 19, 2:44 pm, tenjets <spameister3...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with you? You side with Chavez. You're happy with the
> fact that Islamic jihadists hate Obama. You have nothing to offer.
***
No I don't like Chavez. I was just pointing out how naive,
hypocritical and stupid Obama really is.

tenjets

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 5:44:30 PM12/19/09
to

Nope. You're just pointing out that you'll use any - ANY - source to
support your own twisted world view.

Kixi

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 6:43:34 PM12/19/09
to

Obama had good intentions. He campaigned against the lobby in
Washinton but after settling into his offices he came up against the
reality of Lobby power.

No more illegal settlement expansion he declared ... then he noticed
congress obstructing even his domestic agenda. After he gave in to
Netanyahu the wheels started turning again for him in Washington.

I still think he has good intentions for Palestine and the Islamic
world but now he will achieve much less and over a longer period of
time.

duckstandard

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 8:58:36 PM12/19/09
to

OK, lets say he is dumb as fuck and helpless as 3 day old sparrow.

Then, WHERE THE FUCK IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AT TO MAKE SURE *BAD*
THING DON"T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF OBAMA'S *OBVIOUS* EVER-PRESENT
WEAKNESSES??

Huh you stingy fucking pieces of shit?

Or is it that Republicans have nothing whatsoever to offer?

David Johnston

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 3:39:42 AM12/20/09
to
It was only morons like you who thought Obama was a pacifist.

Pete

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 4:12:42 AM12/20/09
to
David Johnston wrote

>
> It was only morons like you who thought Obama was a pacifist.

Now that Republicans appear to oppose everything that Obama does, they are
inadvertently becoming pacifists.

That's what happens when someone is programmed to say "NO" to everything that
Obama thinks, even when it opposes their idealogy.


tenjets

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 11:53:14 AM12/20/09
to
On Dec 19, 5:58 pm, duckstandard <duckst...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> Crap Detector wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2:44 pm, tenjets <spameister3...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > What's wrong with you? You side with Chavez. You're happy with the
> > > fact that Islamic jihadists hate Obama. You have nothing to offer.
> > ***
> > No I don't like Chavez. I was just pointing out how naive,
> > hypocritical and stupid Obama really is.
>
> OK, lets say he is dumb as fuck and helpless as 3 day old sparrow.
>
> Then, WHERE THE FUCK IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AT TO MAKE SURE *BAD*
> THING DON"T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF OBAMA'S *OBVIOUS* EVER-PRESENT
> WEAKNESSES??
>

That's the question I ask whenever Crappers like Crap Detector blame
Clinton for 911

> Huh you stingy fucking pieces of shit?
>
> Or is it that Republicans have nothing whatsoever to offer?

Exactly.

macksamillion

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 5:01:25 PM12/20/09
to
"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:2kori5dqff84uiokt...@4ax.com...

> It was only morons like you who thought Obama was a pacifist.

Compared to GW Bush, Obama is a saint of higher esteem than Mother Theresa.


Sunny Malone

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 5:54:34 PM12/20/09
to
On Dec 19, 2:26 pm, Crap Detector <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote:
> There is definite evidence of this. U.S. rockets recently hit jihadist
> training camps in Yemen. Reports show
> that anti-Americanism has increased recently in Pakistan with more
> drone rocket attacks against jihadists
> in Waziristan and north eastern Afghanistan. Civil wars in Somalia and
> Sudan could result in jihadists
> gaining control in those African countries.
>
> Yesterday we leaned of incursions by Iranian forces into Iraq, a
> development that could have disturbing effects for the Obama
> government.
>
> Obama thought that by stating Islam is a religion (actually it's more
> an ideology and culture) of peace

Stop righjt there, moron. GEORGE W. BUSH and Conoleeza Rice (you've
heard of them right) are the ones who stated that "Islam was a
religion of peace" and gave tens of billions in AID to Muslim
dictators in Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, not to mention the billions
spent for "reconstruction aid" in Iraq and Afghanistan. See, this is
why Deilley repeatedly calls you a liar and distorter. What you say
about Obama's policies towards the Muslim world are somewhat true,
they were doubly true though when applied to Bush. Hell Bush even had
the dictators of Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia at his private ranch
in Crawford.

Crap Detector

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 6:15:55 PM12/20/09
to
On Dec 20, 5:54 pm, Sunny Malone <sunnymal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2:26 pm, Crap Detector <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> > There is definite evidence of this. U.S. rockets recently hit jihadist
> > training camps in Yemen. Reports show
> > that anti-Americanism has increased recently in Pakistan with more
> > drone rocket attacks against jihadists
> > in Waziristan and north eastern Afghanistan. Civil wars in Somalia and
> > Sudan could result in jihadists
> > gaining control in those African countries.
>
> > Yesterday we leaned of incursions by Iranian forces into Iraq, a
> > development that could have disturbing effects for the Obama
> > government.
>
> > Obama thought that by stating Islam is a religion (actually it's more
> > an ideology and culture) of peace
>
> Stop righjt there, moron. GEORGE W. BUSH and Conoleeza Rice (you've
> heard of them right) are the ones who stated that "Islam was a
> religion of peace" and gave tens of billions in AID to Muslim
> dictators in Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, not to mention the billions
> spent for "reconstruction aid" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
***
But I never said I agreed with Bush and Rice on this. In fact I have
always been much opposed. Bush's foreign policy was a big improvement
over that of Clinton's, but it left much to be desired. In fact Bush's
road map policy to a Palestinian/Israel peace settlement
angered me considerably.

See, this is
> why Deilley repeatedly calls you a liar and distorter.

Deilley has never really understood what I was saying. He is a leftist
pinhead.


What you say
> about Obama's policies towards the Muslim world are somewhat true,
> they were doubly true though when applied to Bush. Hell Bush even had
> the dictators of Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia at his private ranch
> in Crawford.
>

I did not like this on the part of Bush. He did not understand Islam
the way that Winston Churchill or Edmund Burke did.

But then Clinton had Arafat at Camp David.


>
> > would win the U.S. points in the Muslim world. But such has not been
> > the case. The recent Fort Hood massacre, the first domestic Muslim
> > terrorist attack since 9/11 has made many Americans more fearful
> > and insecure than under Bush. Promising to close Gitmo and now to
> > award high Muslim terrorist captives
> > civil trials in NYC has angered many American citizens but has not
> > gained Obama any brownie points among Muslims and liberal/ commies and
> > leftist fascists worldwide.
>
> > This was made clear by Venezuela's Marxist dictator of Hugo Chavez who
> > recently stated to the world that
> > Obama smells of (Satanic) sulphur, just like his predecessor George
> > Bush. During the 2008 election Democrats emphasized the idea that
> > Obama would improve America's image worldwide that had been
> > so badly tarnished by Bush. The ignorant leftist morons that said this
> > had obviously never heard of the 1950s
> > novel and movie, "The Ugly American". And Obama's election has not

> > changed that perception at all.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sunny Malone

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 6:37:43 PM12/20/09
to
On Dec 20, 6:15 pm, Crap Detector <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote:

>
> But then Clinton had Arafat at Camp David.
>

Of course he did and he was right to do so. He was trying to get him
and Ehud Barak to sign a peace agreement. Arafat stupidly rejected a
reasonable Israeli-American peace offer and we are where we are in the
Middle East because of Arafat's foolishness. Had the peace plan
succeeded, Clinton probably would have won the Nobel.

Message has been deleted

macksamillion

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:50:49 PM12/21/09
to

"E. Barry Bruyea" <terml...@democracy.com> wrote in message
news:v8kui5d4pbtb5q5pc...@4ax.com...
> I guess that's why Obama has authorized more drone attacks since he
> took office than Bush did in his two terms as president and is sending
> 30K more troops to Afghanistan. Is that what it takes to be a Saint?
> After all, he's only B+ president.

"Drone attacks"? Are you for real? The U.S. is STILL in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are
still waging war on foreign countries. Why would you separate every other bloody assault
from "drone attacks"? When the U.S. gets the hell out of the war business, it will be
just like any other country in the world: no attacks unless attacked.

You might want to note that AMERICAN military deaths are down by huge numbers since the
Bush days. 904 in 2007. 314 in 2008. And 150 in 2009 (Obama elected Nov 2008).

The Americans don't care how many foreigners they kill; they just don't like their own
invading members killed. Obama has done that for them.


0 new messages