Yesterday we leaned of incursions by Iranian forces into Iraq, a
development that could have disturbing effects for the Obama
government.
Obama thought that by stating Islam is a religion (actually it's more
an ideology and culture) of peace
would win the U.S. points in the Muslim world. But such has not been
the case. The recent Fort Hood massacre, the first domestic Muslim
terrorist attack since 9/11 has made many Americans more fearful
and insecure than under Bush. Promising to close Gitmo and now to
award high Muslim terrorist captives
civil trials in NYC has angered many American citizens but has not
gained Obama any brownie points among Muslims and liberal/ commies and
leftist fascists worldwide.
This was made clear by Venezuela's Marxist dictator of Hugo Chavez who
recently stated to the world that
Obama smells of (Satanic) sulphur, just like his predecessor George
Bush. During the 2008 election Democrats emphasized the idea that
Obama would improve America's image worldwide that had been
so badly tarnished by Bush. The ignorant leftist morons that said this
had obviously never heard of the 1950s
novel and movie, "The Ugly American". And Obama's election has not
changed that perception at all.
Nope. You're just pointing out that you'll use any - ANY - source to
support your own twisted world view.
Obama had good intentions. He campaigned against the lobby in
Washinton but after settling into his offices he came up against the
reality of Lobby power.
No more illegal settlement expansion he declared ... then he noticed
congress obstructing even his domestic agenda. After he gave in to
Netanyahu the wheels started turning again for him in Washington.
I still think he has good intentions for Palestine and the Islamic
world but now he will achieve much less and over a longer period of
time.
OK, lets say he is dumb as fuck and helpless as 3 day old sparrow.
Then, WHERE THE FUCK IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AT TO MAKE SURE *BAD*
THING DON"T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF OBAMA'S *OBVIOUS* EVER-PRESENT
WEAKNESSES??
Huh you stingy fucking pieces of shit?
Or is it that Republicans have nothing whatsoever to offer?
Now that Republicans appear to oppose everything that Obama does, they are
inadvertently becoming pacifists.
That's what happens when someone is programmed to say "NO" to everything that
Obama thinks, even when it opposes their idealogy.
That's the question I ask whenever Crappers like Crap Detector blame
Clinton for 911
> Huh you stingy fucking pieces of shit?
>
> Or is it that Republicans have nothing whatsoever to offer?
Exactly.
Compared to GW Bush, Obama is a saint of higher esteem than Mother Theresa.
Stop righjt there, moron. GEORGE W. BUSH and Conoleeza Rice (you've
heard of them right) are the ones who stated that "Islam was a
religion of peace" and gave tens of billions in AID to Muslim
dictators in Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, not to mention the billions
spent for "reconstruction aid" in Iraq and Afghanistan. See, this is
why Deilley repeatedly calls you a liar and distorter. What you say
about Obama's policies towards the Muslim world are somewhat true,
they were doubly true though when applied to Bush. Hell Bush even had
the dictators of Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia at his private ranch
in Crawford.
See, this is
> why Deilley repeatedly calls you a liar and distorter.
Deilley has never really understood what I was saying. He is a leftist
pinhead.
What you say
> about Obama's policies towards the Muslim world are somewhat true,
> they were doubly true though when applied to Bush. Hell Bush even had
> the dictators of Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia at his private ranch
> in Crawford.
>
I did not like this on the part of Bush. He did not understand Islam
the way that Winston Churchill or Edmund Burke did.
But then Clinton had Arafat at Camp David.
>
> > would win the U.S. points in the Muslim world. But such has not been
> > the case. The recent Fort Hood massacre, the first domestic Muslim
> > terrorist attack since 9/11 has made many Americans more fearful
> > and insecure than under Bush. Promising to close Gitmo and now to
> > award high Muslim terrorist captives
> > civil trials in NYC has angered many American citizens but has not
> > gained Obama any brownie points among Muslims and liberal/ commies and
> > leftist fascists worldwide.
>
> > This was made clear by Venezuela's Marxist dictator of Hugo Chavez who
> > recently stated to the world that
> > Obama smells of (Satanic) sulphur, just like his predecessor George
> > Bush. During the 2008 election Democrats emphasized the idea that
> > Obama would improve America's image worldwide that had been
> > so badly tarnished by Bush. The ignorant leftist morons that said this
> > had obviously never heard of the 1950s
> > novel and movie, "The Ugly American". And Obama's election has not
> > changed that perception at all.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>
> But then Clinton had Arafat at Camp David.
>
Of course he did and he was right to do so. He was trying to get him
and Ehud Barak to sign a peace agreement. Arafat stupidly rejected a
reasonable Israeli-American peace offer and we are where we are in the
Middle East because of Arafat's foolishness. Had the peace plan
succeeded, Clinton probably would have won the Nobel.
"Drone attacks"? Are you for real? The U.S. is STILL in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are
still waging war on foreign countries. Why would you separate every other bloody assault
from "drone attacks"? When the U.S. gets the hell out of the war business, it will be
just like any other country in the world: no attacks unless attacked.
You might want to note that AMERICAN military deaths are down by huge numbers since the
Bush days. 904 in 2007. 314 in 2008. And 150 in 2009 (Obama elected Nov 2008).
The Americans don't care how many foreigners they kill; they just don't like their own
invading members killed. Obama has done that for them.