Climate kooks go mad over CRU emails, lib media DUCKS!
$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto
bag, the horse bolted the barn, the genie is out of the bottle.
Monday, Nov 23 at 10:13 pm
Will Old Media Cover Global Warming Scandal?
The blogosphere is abuzz with news of the latest global warming
scandal. A latter day "Daniel Ellsberg" has released the climate
equivalent of the Pentagon Papers onto the web.
In 1971 former Defense Department employee Daniel Ellsberg turned over
a large collection of Pentagon Vietnam War related documents to the
New York Times. Recently an unknown whistler blower released 61
megabytes of documents along with emails involving communications
between Professor Phil Jones, Director of the Climate Research Unit at
the University of East Anglia, and various other scientists who
support the claim that humans can raise air temperatures by increasing
the amount of the magical atmospheric gas carbon dioxide (CO2).
Some of the old media are reporting this scandal, but most seem to be
ignoring it.
John Delingpole on the London Telegraph site suggests: "The Global
Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and
quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at
the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU)
and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet.
(Hat tip: Watts Up With That)"
Andrew Bolt of the Herald Sun suggests "the 1079 emails and 72
documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most
prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal
that is one of the greatest in modern science. I’ve been adding some
of the most astonishing in updates below - emails suggesting
conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal
destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to
disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their
public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again
will “peer review” be used to shout down skeptics."
Marc Sheppard points out the hypocrisy of Jones, et.al. criticizing
the funding of their opponents. Of the two documents that mention
funding for global warming claims it's "the second document (potential-
funding.doc) that tells the more compelling tale. In addition to four
government sources of potential CRU funding, it lists an equal number
of “energy agencies” they might put the bite on. Three -- the Carbon
Trust, the Northern Energy Initiative and the Energy Saving Trust --
are UK-based consultancy and funding specialists promoting “new
energy” technologies with the goal of reducing carbon dioxide
emissions. The fourth -- Renewables North West -- is an American
company promoting the expansion of solar, wind and geothermal energy
in the Pacific Northwest."
Bishop Hill has an index of many of the emails for those interested in
further reading. There is also a searchable database.
These revelations aren't the first that question claims about global
warming. Lawrence Solomon reported that the Enron Corporation pushed
global warming claims in the 1990's because of a desire to profit from
trading carbon credits. Enron also felt it would benefit from
encouraging use of its natural gas holdings over coal and petroleum.
Former Enron official Jeff Shields has been associated with Renewables
North West.
Will the old media continue to ignore evidence that global warming is
a fraud, or will they decide to expose it like they did Watergate and
other past scandals? Have old media reporters been ignoring the
scandal because they are being paid to, or are they just too lazy to
investigate claims of fraud?
OuroborosRex
> Guess what enviroimbeciles?...IT'S TOO LATE! The cat is out of the
> bag, the horse bolted the barn, the genie is out of the bottle.
>
> Monday, Nov 23 at 10:13 pm
> Will Old Media Cover Global Warming Scandal?
>
> The blogosphere is abuzz with news of the latest global warming
> scandal. A latter day "Daniel Ellsberg" has released the climate
> equivalent of the Pentagon Papers onto the web.
>
> In 1971 former Defense Department employee Daniel Ellsberg turned over
> a large collection of Pentagon Vietnam War related documents to the
> New York Times. Recently an unknown whistler blower released 61
> megabytes of documents along with emails involving communications
> between Professor Phil Jones, Director of the Climate Research Unit at
> the University of East Anglia, and various other scientists who
> support the claim that humans can raise air temperatures by increasing
> the amount of the magical atmospheric gas carbon dioxide (CO2).
>
> Some of the old media are reporting this scandal, but most seem to be
> ignoring it.
>
> John Delingpole on the London Telegraph site suggests: "The Global
> Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and
> quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at
> and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet.
> (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)"
>
> Andrew Bolt of the Herald Sun suggests "the 1079 emails and 72
> documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most
> prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal
> of the most astonishing in updates below - emails suggesting
> conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal
> destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to
> disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their
> public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again
>
> Marc Sheppard points out the hypocrisy of Jones, et.al. criticizing
> the funding of their opponents. Of the two documents that mention
> funding for global warming claims it's "the second document (potential-
> funding.doc) that tells the more compelling tale. In addition to four
> government sources of potential CRU funding, it lists an equal number
> Trust, the Northern Energy Initiative and the Energy Saving Trust --
> energy� technologies with the goal of reducing carbon dioxide
> emissions. The fourth -- Renewables North West -- is an American
> company promoting the expansion of solar, wind and geothermal energy
> in the Pacific Northwest."
>
> Bishop Hill has an index of many of the emails for those interested in
> further reading. There is also a searchable database.
>
> These revelations aren't the first that question claims about global
> warming. Lawrence Solomon reported that the Enron Corporation pushed
> global warming claims in the 1990's because of a desire to profit from
> trading carbon credits. Enron also felt it would benefit from
> encouraging use of its natural gas holdings over coal and petroleum.
> Former Enron official Jeff Shields has been associated with Renewables
> North West.
>
> Will the old media continue to ignore evidence that global warming is
> a fraud, or will they decide to expose it like they did Watergate and
> other past scandals? Have old media reporters been ignoring the
> scandal because they are being paid to, or are they just too lazy to
> investigate claims of fraud?
Day 5, still zero fraud found. lol