Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

63% of committed relationships have become more compatible

16 views
Skip to first unread message

David Dalton

unread,
Apr 12, 2023, 11:37:00 PM4/12/23
to
My latest global fumblings are described on the thread
“Collaborators are now ready to proceed”
on alt.religion.druid . One feature is that 63%
of committed relationships should have become
more, usually optimally, sexually compatible.

Also soon I think same sex relationships will be
more likely to stick (lock for life).

--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"And now the angry morning; Gives the early signs of warning; You must
face alone the plans you make; Decisions they will try to break" (S. McL.)

Queer Senior

unread,
Apr 14, 2023, 3:23:40 PM4/14/23
to
David, I believe, and I am only basing this on my personal experiences, that same-sex relationships will have a much higher possibility for sexual compatibility than opposite sex. And I'll be frank, 2F relationships have the best possibility, but 2M are not far behind.

I've had several partners over the years that were very compatible sexually. Too, I could tell after just one or two encounters if they weren't. Yes, there have been partners that were not a good fit, but overall, most were.

David Dalton

unread,
Apr 19, 2023, 12:08:49 AM4/19/23
to
On Apr 14, 2023, Queer Senior wrote
(in article<defcc8c5-94b3-4e91...@googlegroups.com>):
Yes, in my Eight Sexual Harmonics theory, same sex
relationships:

gay--gay, gay--bim, bim--bim, lesbian--lesbian, lesbian--bif, bif--bif

are all optimally sexually compatible. That is, they and
straight-type-2-M and straight-type-2-F do not have
partial compatibility (less than optimally compatible
and less likely to stick; bim--bif, bim--straight-type-1-F
and bif--straight-type-2-M).

But optimally sexually compatible does not mean
necessarily optimally compatible personality-wise.

Also in the past same sex relationships have not
been likely to stick at times, but I think my workings
may have made that no longer the case, or will soon.

Queer Senior

unread,
Apr 26, 2023, 7:45:53 AM4/26/23
to
David, you have brought up an excellent point.  An optimally compatible personality is a must for being sexually compatible. If the person irks you in any way, there is no way sexual encounters with that person can be enjoyed, especially long term.  However, if he has that "perfect" personality, the sex will be perfect too!  The one issue that hampered a relationship I became involved in about 4-years ago was a large age gap.  I met a significantly younger guy, he was 22 and I was 64, and he was such a wonderful young man, both personality-wise, plus he was extremely physically attractive.  Amazing as this sounds, we just hit it off!  We had a relationship for a year before our relationship was sabotaged by COVID.  While the age difference did present a few problems, our feelings for each other helped us overcome those issues.  As I said, because of COVID, our relationship got put on hold.  As could be expected, that ended it between us.  Until just a few weeks ago!  A chance meeting has rekindled our relationship.  Had anything changed?  Other than we are both three years older, and I swear, he's even more attractive, not really!  Our personalities are still compatible, which also makes our sexual encounters heavenly!     

On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 12:08:49 AM UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:



0 new messages