(Maurice and Hanna) Strong warming; strong warning
David Dalton
from 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Newfoundland Time
featuring Maurice Strong with quite a bit of mention
of his wife Hanna Strong. At maybe 8:15 p.m.
(so 6:45 p.m. in Ottawa) I did not do a full biomagicoenergetic
boost of them but applied some grounding and some
previously derived heart, stroke, youthening and
sexuality components, and renewed their marriage.
However I later intuited that they are in a solid threesome
(either fourth orientation male and two bisexual by
nature women or a fourth orientation woman and
two bisexual by nature men and I do not know
which, they would know, but I think the first)
and renewed that solid triangle spiritual marriage.
However on March 1 or 2 I did a full biomagicoenergetic
boost/physical [non bacterial non viral though it may help
a bit there too but I have also divined HIV and Ebola
cure locations in blood] healing/mental healing/healing
of criminality if any, of, among others, Canadian prime
minister Paul Martin so he should have noted some
improvement on March 2. However while at the same
time I thought that maybe I healed Danny Williams and
J Lo of money related problems I don't think Paul Martin
had a significant money related problem, maybe a little.
Anyway has anyone on here been to Rio or Kyoto
conferences and when and where is the next one
hoped for? Again my extinction reel message may be
of interest. Also has anyone been to Hanna Strong's
multifaith retreat? Also is Maurice Strong related to
former University of Victoria president David Strong,
I know his daughter Kim who was a year behind
me at Memorial University many years ago.
OK, that is just some probably incorrect stuff and
I am not out of my "wilderness" years yet but hope
to be by full moon, and am claiming to be a global
Opener of the Way (leader to the promised land/new age)
but have no followers and want none, I want people
to think for themselves, but am pushing certain
essential messages and not other elements of my
evolving personal spiritual path, much of which is
working theories. Basically I don't care what anyone
believes as long as they are loving, and the fundamental
is love and conflicting messages (even if on paper
a long time) must be discarded or modified to be loving.
Also just like a multinational corposration, a religion
must obey the laws of a jurisdiction it intersects. Large
religions would want small ones to follow the law and
they must do the same.
Oh, all members of the triangle mentioned above have
handshake associations with Gaia and with LOVE but
do not have to worship them. (Handshake associations
are like shakti associations but I am not attracted to
the individuals involve and visualize a handshake rather
than a kiss, and the association, and get the shakti buzz;
and I still have to research the term shakti more to see if
it is appropriate and else will change it.)
OK, for the rest of the day I must work on my geophysics/applied
math Ph.D. thesis proposal stuff and help some geology first
year students but I may post some more on this thread this
evening if I have an afterthought of if (unlikely) there are
any questions
But obviously if Hanna and Maurice are in a solid triangle,
and if Kofi Annan is gay as I have previously divined, they,
without necessarily admiting it publicly, should investigate
with the WHO the cures mentioned below, and should
also investigate my environmental strict extinction reel
message below in extinction.html and seen before on
some of these groups during November waning crescent.
Else they might consider this just entertainment or
another "wilderness" years off tangent from me.
I have been hanging out on alt.music.s-mclachlan a
lot but plan to move some of that to misc.misc
but tend to post to a lot of groups.
David
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/nf.html
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/extinction.html
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/4O.html
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/cindercorr.html (scan for HIV, Ebola
cures)
David Dalton
wrote:
>Also I have earlier in the week again tried to pass
>on my connections to others, notably loveagents (not
>just human) other than me if I am one. Those
>are LOVE and someones chosen by LOVE because
>of their goodness, but who do not have to worship LOVE.
There should be some in all large religions, most small
religions, atheism, agnosticism, humanism, and some among
those with individual spiritual paths such as me, though I
do not know if I am one (I still eat dairy products and
eggs and fish and have been getting a lot of cabs
instead of walking lately) but I am the one passing on
the connections granted and toiled for by me in the
last 155.6 lunar months particular (in terms of toil/
"wilderness years"/trial and error) the last 101
lunar months. (A synodic lunar month is
29.53059 days NOT 28!!!!!)
I have to run catch a cab.
Sorry for the afterthought format, I should proofread some more..
David Dalton
<dal...@nfld.com> wrote:
>Last night Life and Times was on CBC Television
>from 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Newfoundland Time
>featuring Maurice Strong with quite a bit of mention
>of his wife Hanna Strong. At maybe 8:15 p.m.
>(so 6:45 p.m. in Ottawa) I did not do a full biomagicoenergetic
>boost of them but applied some grounding and some
>previously derived heart, stroke,
healing of course, not induction of illness
> youthening and
>sexuality components, and renewed their marriage.
Also type II diabetes healing component.
But anyway such may be initiated now but may take some
time for a full cure I imagine.
Also such use of such previously derived components
by me may be less effective than if I did a full boost
of each and I would do that on request.
Also I have earlier in the week again tried to pass
on my connections to others, notably loveagents (not
just human) other than me if I am one. Those
are LOVE and someones chosen by LOVE because
of their goodness, but who do not have to worship LOVE.
LOVE is the nearest or exact match someone to ALL's defnition
of perfect love/goodness, where such would be to ALL's
defintion of maximum (weighted somehow) love/goodness
if it has no definition of perfect love/goodness. ALL
is the nearest or exact match someone to all/everything
(all as a unit, not all as a group of someones) defined by "Is
there anything outside all/everything? No." and in exact
match ALL is onbviously all powerful and the ultimate creator
(ALL[t] creates ALL[t+Delta t]) creating within itself. It
is stupid to ask what was before ALL, obviously it
was the previous ALL. So anyway ALL in my view
matches the Nicene Creed definition of the Catholic
God as all powerful creator but however is not remote
from the universe [which I define as space and its contents]
but I believe
is a superset of the universe, except that universe is
incorrectly defined as everything in many english dictionaries
whereas most modern physicists, and I, don't use the
word in that way. But if you do, there can be nothing
oustide it, anything that exists is all/everything or a subset
of it, any elementary school student can see that from the
definition of the word all (again the unit definition, not the
parallel one of all someones in a group of someones).
Also ALL is not perfect, obviously, since if it was each
subset of ALL would be perfect, and I am not perfect.
Now again I am not pushing my theory of ALL and LOVE
but certain essential messages on my Salmon on the
Thorns web page (scroll down to the messages section)
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html .
DRD
David Dalton
wrote:
>OK, that is just some probably incorrect stuff and
>I am not out of my "wilderness" years yet but hope
>to be by full moon, and am claiming to be a global
>Opener of the Way (leader to the promised land/new age)
>but have no followers and want none, I want people
>to think for themselves, but am pushing certain
>essential messages
pushing them
to my people (the over 6 billion humans in the Global Village,
[the planet and near space]
it is time we came together as a species, but I do not want
a melting pot religion, but lots of loving diversity, and am
not starting a religion, there are plenty of them.)
David
David Dalton
for a few hours at least.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:47:21 -0330, David Dalton <dal...@nfld.com>
wrote:
>Also I have earlier in the week
close to first quarter I guess, holy grail, moon on a stem
> again tried to pass
>on my connections to others, notably loveagents (not
>just human) other than me if I am one. Those
>are LOVE and someones chosen by LOVE because
>of their goodness, but who do not have to worship LOVE.
Perhaps such passing on does not take effect until full moon.
David