Retcon the Timeless Child

[The Doctor]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/SpitzDoctorWhoGroup/posts/10160656656562771/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9361046/reviews?ref_=tt_urv
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

[The Last Doctor]

The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/SpitzDoctorWhoGroup/posts/10160656656562771/

I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks
like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave. I’m not
applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its
discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9361046/reviews?sort=userRating&dir=desc

Fixed your link, for some reason your version was starting at the very
bottom end of the reviews … the episode had 6k ratings for an average of
5.2 stars (yes, it was divisive) but 121 of 276 reviews (only 2.5% of
raters places a review) are 1 star - which just reflects the fact that far
more people who dislike a thing write to criticise than those who like it
write to praise it … and maybe you should get a chance to read some other
views before getting bored with dozens of essentially identical hate
reviews …

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

[The Doctor]

In article <ukqflv$sio7$1...@dont-email.me>,

The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/SpitzDoctorWhoGroup/posts/10160656656562771/
>
> I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks
>like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave.
>I’m not
>applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its
>discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.
>

Try joining.

>https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9361046/reviews?sort=userRating&dir=desc
>
>Fixed your link, for some reason your version was starting at the very
>bottom end of the reviews … the episode had 6k ratings for an average of
>5.2 stars (yes, it was divisive) but 121 of 276 reviews (only 2.5% of
>raters places a review) are 1 star - which just reflects the fact that far
>more people who dislike a thing write to criticise than those who like it
>write to praise it … and maybe you should get a chance to read some other
>views before getting bored with dozens of essentially identical hate
>reviews …
>

Fixed or are you putting a fix?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

[Travoltron]

On 12/6/2023 10:48 AM, The Last Doctor wrote:
> I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks
> like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave. I’m not
> applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its
> discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.

What a coward you are.

[The Last Doctor]

If that group changes its public identity from “Doctor Who” to something
that makes is clear it isn’t the official forum of Doctor Who, and opens up
its posts to be read so that a reasonable decision can be made as to
whether it’s a community I’d like to engage with, then I can decide.

Meanwhile Dave would be welcome to copy-paste some of the content so that
we can see what is being discussed. Why on Earth would any sensible person
want to validate a group that hides its identity and its discussions by
trying to join it?

Meaningless accusations of cowardice are just trolling.

[The Doctor]

In article <uljmm1$2baji$1...@dont-email.me>,

What do you expect from the Pro-Timess Child group?

[The Doctor]

In article <ulju4u$2cfk6$1...@dont-email.me>,

The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:

Who trolls who?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor