Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Doctor Who - The Star Beast - Review with spoliers
1 view
Skip to first unread message
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2023, 3:25:57 PM11/25/23
to
Doctor Who The Star Beast 8/10
RTD gives us David Tennant as the REAL 13th Doctor!
Donna is Back with a daughter Rose.
Great reboot to get the Star Beast back.
Love the beginning about bring back the 10th Doctor
and Donna Noble memories. Yes David Tennant is the REAL 13th Doctor.
Very intense. Who are the good Guys and Who are the villains?
All right , Welcome to Camden!
The Doctor on arrival decides to help someone
only to realise it Donna. Oops! Catherine Tate is still he lovely obnoxious
self.
Rose is called. The Doctor thinks how did she get here?
Yes, This Rose is Donna's daughter.
A ship crash lands apparantly. The doctor takes cab to the scene.
The psychic paper is in faux mode.
The Doctor breaks into the scene.
Donna comes home. Rose brings home an alien, white and fluffy,
called the Meep.
Green scaled aliens are also on the scene looking for the alien.
A friend of Rose is scared off.
All hands on deck!!
UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
The marching soldiers are turned in hypotised troops.
They will try to go on to enlist more troops.
They will also confront the Green alien bug-like creatures.
At home
Rose gives the Star Beast a place to stay.
Donna discovers the Star Beast.
Donna's mother tries to keep the Doctor out.
no avail.
Donna's husband is back!
Suddenly hypotised UNIT troops and the bugs makes Donna's house
into the battleground.
Time for an escape plan!!
RTD nice work on the forceshield idea! Great to see the RTD touch back.
Let the troops fight and up the stairs for the escape.
2nd level compromised, head for the attic.
Use the attic and the sleeping neighbour to escape.
Off my go in the Cab, and find a parking lot to hold court.
The Doctor is deciding what is what.
2 green alien soldiers explain the situation
and explain the Star Beast is psychotic.
2 green aliens are shot dead by the Star Beast.
Whoops the Doctor is now trapped.
Back to the UNIT cordoned ship, which is the Star Beast ship!
The Beast is supposedly in charge.
Here is where I encourage to watch the ending scene.
The Doctor-Donna is back and so is a Doctor-Donna-Rose.
Excellent wrap up! Chris Chibnall eat your heart out!
The fight is on with Donna helping out.
Genetic hereditary plays a role.
David Tennant is back as the REAL 13th Doctor!!
And the star beast is captured and will be jailed.
Donna gets to see the new TARDIS.
This TARDIS really looks like Disney influenced.
So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
And where is the Toymaker?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com
RTD gives us David Tennant as the REAL 13th Doctor!
Donna is Back with a daughter Rose.
Great reboot to get the Star Beast back.
Love the beginning about bring back the 10th Doctor
and Donna Noble memories. Yes David Tennant is the REAL 13th Doctor.
Very intense. Who are the good Guys and Who are the villains?
All right , Welcome to Camden!
The Doctor on arrival decides to help someone
only to realise it Donna. Oops! Catherine Tate is still he lovely obnoxious
self.
Rose is called. The Doctor thinks how did she get here?
Yes, This Rose is Donna's daughter.
A ship crash lands apparantly. The doctor takes cab to the scene.
The psychic paper is in faux mode.
The Doctor breaks into the scene.
Donna comes home. Rose brings home an alien, white and fluffy,
called the Meep.
Green scaled aliens are also on the scene looking for the alien.
A friend of Rose is scared off.
All hands on deck!!
UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
The marching soldiers are turned in hypotised troops.
They will try to go on to enlist more troops.
They will also confront the Green alien bug-like creatures.
At home
Rose gives the Star Beast a place to stay.
Donna discovers the Star Beast.
Donna's mother tries to keep the Doctor out.
no avail.
Donna's husband is back!
Suddenly hypotised UNIT troops and the bugs makes Donna's house
into the battleground.
Time for an escape plan!!
RTD nice work on the forceshield idea! Great to see the RTD touch back.
Let the troops fight and up the stairs for the escape.
2nd level compromised, head for the attic.
Use the attic and the sleeping neighbour to escape.
Off my go in the Cab, and find a parking lot to hold court.
The Doctor is deciding what is what.
2 green alien soldiers explain the situation
and explain the Star Beast is psychotic.
2 green aliens are shot dead by the Star Beast.
Whoops the Doctor is now trapped.
Back to the UNIT cordoned ship, which is the Star Beast ship!
The Beast is supposedly in charge.
Here is where I encourage to watch the ending scene.
The Doctor-Donna is back and so is a Doctor-Donna-Rose.
Excellent wrap up! Chris Chibnall eat your heart out!
The fight is on with Donna helping out.
Genetic hereditary plays a role.
David Tennant is back as the REAL 13th Doctor!!
And the star beast is captured and will be jailed.
Donna gets to see the new TARDIS.
This TARDIS really looks like Disney influenced.
So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
And where is the Toymaker?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com
Tim Merrigan
Nov 25, 2023, 4:49:07 PM11/25/23
to
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:
>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
(The Doctor) wrote:
>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
--
Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
Tim Merrigan
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
Sjouke Burry
Nov 25, 2023, 6:06:32 PM11/25/23
to
On 25.11.23 21:25, The Doctor wrote:
> Doctor Who The Star Beast 8/10
>
>
>
> RTD gives us David Tennant as the REAL 13th Doctor!
>
>
Do these empty lines symbolise the contents
> Doctor Who The Star Beast 8/10
>
>
>
> RTD gives us David Tennant as the REAL 13th Doctor!
>
>
of your brain??????
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2023, 8:08:35 PM11/25/23
to
In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>
>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>
>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
And your rating is?
>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>
>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>
>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
Tim Merrigan
Nov 25, 2023, 9:40:19 PM11/25/23
to
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:
>In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>
>>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>
>>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>
>And your rating is?
I enjoyed it.
>In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>
>>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>
>>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>
>And your rating is?
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2023, 10:47:39 PM11/25/23
to
In article <evb5mipoon8mqa4u3...@4ax.com>,
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>
>>>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>
>>>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>
>>And your rating is?
>
>I enjoyed it.
Out of 10 ?
>On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>>So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>
>>>Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>
>>>Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>
>>And your rating is?
>
>I enjoyed it.
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
anim8rfsk
Nov 26, 2023, 12:14:26 AM11/26/23
to
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <evb5mipoon8mqa4u3...@4ax.com>,
> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>>
>>>> Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>> apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>>
>>>> Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>> Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>> BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>>
>>> And your rating is?
>>
>> I enjoyed it.
>
> Out of 10 ?
1
> In article <evb5mipoon8mqa4u3...@4ax.com>,
> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>>
>>>> Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>> apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>>
>>>> Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>> Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>> BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>>
>>> And your rating is?
>>
>> I enjoyed it.
>
> Out of 10 ?
And that’s entirely for the new TARDIS bridge.
OK, 1.5, the .5 being for Will.
>
>> --
>>
>> Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>>
>> Tim Merrigan
>>
>> --
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>> www.avg.com
>
>
--
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2023, 7:41:04 AM11/26/23
to
In article <1965922232.722668023.6...@news.easynews.com>,
(1.5+4+8+9+10) /5 = 6.7
>
>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>>>
>>> Tim Merrigan
>>>
>>> --
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>>> www.avg.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <evb5mipoon8mqa4u3...@4ax.com>,
>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>>> apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>>>
>>>>> Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>>> Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>>> BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>>>
>>>> And your rating is?
>>>
>>> I enjoyed it.
>>
>> Out of 10 ?
>
>1
>
>And that’s entirely for the new TARDIS bridge.
>
>OK, 1.5, the .5 being for Will.
>
You must reall be on the deep side of hatred!
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <evb5mipoon8mqa4u3...@4ax.com>,
>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:08:33 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <38q4mipbngg1kr49o...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:25:55 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>> (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So in the end why did the TARDIS start on its own?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good synopsis, except for your "real 13th Doctor" crap, and you
>>>>> apparently didn't notice Donna spilling coffee on the control console.
>>>>>
>>>>> Glad I stayed up all night (binging the first two seasons of
>>>>> Mandilorian) to watch it, or this would have been a serious spoiler.
>>>>> BTW that's a synopsis, not a review.
>>>>
>>>> And your rating is?
>>>
>>> I enjoyed it.
>>
>> Out of 10 ?
>
>1
>
>And that’s entirely for the new TARDIS bridge.
>
>OK, 1.5, the .5 being for Will.
>
(1.5+4+8+9+10) /5 = 6.7
>
>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>>>
>>> Tim Merrigan
>>>
>>> --
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>>> www.avg.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2023, 7:45:43 AM11/26/23
to
What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as Evil?
anim8rfsk
Nov 26, 2023, 9:20:46 AM11/26/23
to
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as Evil?
Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as Evil?
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2023, 10:28:12 AM11/26/23
to
In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
It was intense.
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>as Evil?
>
>Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>
You must hate new Who.
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>as Evil?
>
>Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>
It was intense.
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2023, 10:28:59 AM11/26/23
to
So far 8.1/10 after 3.1k !
anim8rfsk
Nov 26, 2023, 11:30:04 AM11/26/23
to
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>> as Evil?
>>
>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>
>
> You must hate new Who.
Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>> as Evil?
>>
>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>
>
> You must hate new Who.
the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2023, 6:10:09 PM11/26/23
to
In article <1526320379.722708812.9...@news.easynews.com>,
>>
>> It was intense.
>>
>>> --
>>> The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>> as Evil?
>>>
>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>
>>
>> You must hate new Who.
>
>Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>
I just hate the faux Timeless Child!
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>> as Evil?
>>>
>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>
>>
>> You must hate new Who.
>
>Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>
>>
>> It was intense.
>>
>>> --
>>> The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk
Nov 26, 2023, 8:07:14 PM11/26/23
to
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <1526320379.722708812.9...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>> as Evil?
>>>>
>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You must hate new Who.
>>
>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>
>
> I just hate the faux Timeless Child!
I’ve never seen it. I quit watching the lady Dr with the giant spider
> In article <1526320379.722708812.9...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>> as Evil?
>>>>
>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You must hate new Who.
>>
>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>
>
> I just hate the faux Timeless Child!
episode.
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2023, 8:25:02 AM11/29/23
to
Doctor Who Review The Star Beast 60th anniversary special. After the video
yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
watching :)
https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
--
Let's go Brandon!
yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
watching :)
https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
--
Let's go Brandon!
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2023, 8:56:45 AM11/29/23
to
>> Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
How long did it take him to walk around the control room?
> OK, 1.5, the .5 being for Will.
That's still too generous.
>>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>> And your rating is?
>>>
>>> I enjoyed it.
>>
>> Out of 10 ?
>
> 1
> And that's entirely for the new TARDIS bridge.
You mean the one with wheelchair ramps and long winding walkways?
>>>> And your rating is?
>>>
>>> I enjoyed it.
>>
>> Out of 10 ?
>
> 1
> And that's entirely for the new TARDIS bridge.
How long did it take him to walk around the control room?
> OK, 1.5, the .5 being for Will.
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2023, 9:48:06 AM11/29/23
to
In article <ujvell$gmp$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as
> Evil?
I would have been surprised if he weren't evil after all they did to him
> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as
> Evil?
(ripping out his friends' innards, poking him in the eye, threatening to sell
him to the "highest bidder").
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2023, 9:53:42 AM11/29/23
to
In article <ujtl8j$294a$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
Ironically, she was kinda evil.
>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
And inept.
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 10:14:51 AM11/29/23
to
In article <uk7dvm$ratg$5...@dont-email.me>,
Yet more reaction from reactors.
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 10:18:05 AM11/29/23
to
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 10:20:21 AM11/29/23
to
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 10:20:43 AM11/29/23
to
In article <uk7j65$s7sl$4...@dont-email.me>,
>And inept.
>
With missiles to boot?
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <ujtl8j$294a$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
>
>Ironically, she was kinda evil.
>
Evil?
>In article <ujtl8j$294a$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
>
>Ironically, she was kinda evil.
>
>And inept.
>
With missiles to boot?
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
anim8rfsk
Nov 29, 2023, 12:03:27 PM11/29/23
to
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>> as Evil?
>>>
>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>
>>
>> You must hate new Who.
>
> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>> as Evil?
>>>
>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>
>>
>> You must hate new Who.
>
> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 12:37:08 PM11/29/23
to
In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>
>>
>>>
>>> It was intense.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>> as Evil?
>>>>
>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You must hate new Who.
>>
>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>
>I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>
With Capaldi?
>anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>> as Evil?
>>>>
>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You must hate new Who.
>>
>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>
>I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> It was intense.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk
Nov 29, 2023, 1:04:22 PM11/29/23
to
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>>> as Evil?
>>>>>
>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>
>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>
>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>
>
> With Capaldi?
Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>>> as Evil?
>>>>>
>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>
>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>
>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>
>
> With Capaldi?
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2023, 1:44:03 PM11/29/23
to
In article <uk7ks9$4f2$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
flipped her over.
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
>>
>>Ironically, she was kinda evil.
>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>UNIT has a an officer in a wheelchair. Ticking off boxes RTD?
>>
>>Ironically, she was kinda evil.
>>And inept.
>
>With missiles to boot?
Those missiles should have sent her sailing backwards several meters or
>
>With missiles to boot?
flipped her over.
Your Name
Nov 29, 2023, 3:28:25 PM11/29/23
to
On 2023-11-29 18:04:19 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as Evil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>
>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>
>> With Capaldi?
>
> Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
Crapaldi was the worst of the new Doctors (although it is a tie with
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed as Evil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>
>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>
>> With Capaldi?
>
> Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
Quitopher Etchedinstone) ... until they re-genderised the role to
appease the "Politically Correct" idiots.
Tim Merrigan
Nov 29, 2023, 4:07:13 PM11/29/23
to
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:14:49 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:
>In article <uk7dvm$ratg$5...@dont-email.me>,
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Doctor Who Review The Star Beast 60th anniversary special. After the video
>>yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
>>making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
>>review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
>>good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
>>sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
>>never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
>>morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
>>with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
>>you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
>>watching :)
>>
>>https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
>>
>
>Yet more reaction from reactors.
>
>>--
>>Let's go Brandon!
>>
I could shorten his review from 58 minutes to four words, "I didn't
(The Doctor) wrote:
>In article <uk7dvm$ratg$5...@dont-email.me>,
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Doctor Who Review The Star Beast 60th anniversary special. After the video
>>yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
>>making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
>>review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
>>good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
>>sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
>>never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
>>morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
>>with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
>>you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
>>watching :)
>>
>>https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
>>
>
>Yet more reaction from reactors.
>
>>--
>>Let's go Brandon!
>>
like it".
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 6:46:39 PM11/29/23
to
In article <1648645418.722973481.9...@news.easynews.com>,
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was intense.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article
><1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>>>> as Evil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>
>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>>
>>
>> With Capaldi?
>
>Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
>
He would have worked out if he was not ran over!
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article
><1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star Beast was revealed
>>>>>> as Evil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine until we lost
>>>> the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>
>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later Clara episodes
>>> for the first time and a lot of them aren’t very good.
>>>
>>
>> With Capaldi?
>
>Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was intense.
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 6:49:45 PM11/29/23
to
The Doctor
Nov 29, 2023, 6:50:04 PM11/29/23
to
In article <ut9fmil9p1rute4pu...@4ax.com>,
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
Tim Merrigan <tp...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:14:49 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <uk7dvm$ratg$5...@dont-email.me>,
>>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>Doctor Who Review The Star Beast 60th anniversary special. After the video
>>>yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
>>>making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
>>>review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
>>>good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
>>>sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
>>>never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
>>>morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
>>>with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
>>>you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
>>>watching :)
>>>
>>>https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
>>>
>>
>>Yet more reaction from reactors.
>>
>>>--
>>>Let's go Brandon!
>>>
>
>I could shorten his review from 58 minutes to four words, "I didn't
>like it".
Summary noted!
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:14:49 -0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <uk7dvm$ratg$5...@dont-email.me>,
>>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>Doctor Who Review The Star Beast 60th anniversary special. After the video
>>>yesterday covering some of the main clips and Russell T Davies reasoning for
>>>making the episode like this in the first place. Now it's the full Doctor Who
>>>review breakdown, and boy, is there a lot to this one. While there were some
>>>good scenes, I couldn't enjoy them because I was always waiting for another
>>>sledgehammer of Russell's to hit me in the face and it always came. This was
>>>never intended to be entertainment, this was meant to feed you the new
>>>morality of Hollywood. The BBC is bad enough but now, it's in combination
>>>with Disney+, what a wonderful combination! But what did you think of what
>>>you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for
>>>watching :)
>>>
>>>https://youtu.be/sEItEQN-3uk?si=DglqF9NmY5rsNXW8
>>>
>>
>>Yet more reaction from reactors.
>>
>>>--
>>>Let's go Brandon!
>>>
>
>I could shorten his review from 58 minutes to four words, "I didn't
>like it".
>--
>
>Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
>
>Tim Merrigan
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
Daniel65
Nov 30, 2023, 6:05:18 AM11/30/23
to
The Doctor wrote on 30/11/23 10:49 am:
referring to the Chibnall/Jodie "nightmare" so, once again, there was no
need for YOU, asswipe to make that post!!
But YOU, asswipe, still *HAD* to make your post to increase YOUR
Precious Post Count, asswipe!!
--
Daniel
> In article <uk86t5$vr7d$1...@dont-email.me>, Your Name
> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-11-29 18:04:19 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>> <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star
>>>>>>>>> Beast was revealed as Evil?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine
>>>>>> until we lost the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later
>>>>> Clara episodes for the first time and a lot of them aren’t
> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-11-29 18:04:19 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <1443142495.722970133.0...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>> <1722345356.722701014.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What did you think of the fight scene when the Star
>>>>>>>>> Beast was revealed as Evil?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poorly directed, as was the entire episode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You must hate new Who.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except for the always horrible Donna Noble I liked it fine
>>>>>> until we lost the Impossibly Cute Clara Oswin Oswald.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to qualify that. I am watching a bunch of the later
>>>>> very good.
>>>>
>>>> With Capaldi?
>>>
>>> Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
>>
>> Crapaldi was the worst of the new Doctors (although it is a tie
>> with Quitopher Etchedinstone) ... until they re-genderised the role
>> to appease the "Politically Correct" idiots.
>
> And then you get the Chibnall nightmare!
>
Oh! Keep up, asswipe! Unless I'm seriously mistaken, Your Name was
>>>>
>>>> With Capaldi?
>>>
>>> Yes. It starts to go south really fast with Danny pink.
>>
>> Crapaldi was the worst of the new Doctors (although it is a tie
>> with Quitopher Etchedinstone) ... until they re-genderised the role
>> to appease the "Politically Correct" idiots.
>
> And then you get the Chibnall nightmare!
>
referring to the Chibnall/Jodie "nightmare" so, once again, there was no
need for YOU, asswipe to make that post!!
But YOU, asswipe, still *HAD* to make your post to increase YOUR
Precious Post Count, asswipe!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Nov 30, 2023, 7:37:37 AM11/30/23
to
In article <uk9q9b$1b5lp$1...@dont-email.me>,
>Oh! Keep up, %! Unless I'm seriously mistaken, Your Name was
>
>But YOU, %, still *HAD* to make your post to increase YOUR
>Precious Post Count, %!!
>--
>Daniel
>referring to the Chibnall/Jodie "nightmare" so, once again, there was no
>need for YOU, % to make that post!!
>
>But YOU, %, still *HAD* to make your post to increase YOUR
>Precious Post Count, %!!
>--
>Daniel
Ubiquitous
Dec 1, 2023, 1:58:41 PM12/1/23
to
Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to get
David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=4OoKluiVrNzTDChu
David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=4OoKluiVrNzTDChu
anim8rfsk
Dec 1, 2023, 2:31:33 PM12/1/23
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to get
> David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
> him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>
> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
It’s like they hired the stupidgirl writers.
> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to get
> David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
> him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>
> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>
>
The Doctor
Dec 1, 2023, 5:56:38 PM12/1/23
to
The Doctor
Dec 1, 2023, 5:58:28 PM12/1/23
to
In article <1594847106.723151680.6...@news.easynews.com>,
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to get
>> David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
>> him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>
>It’s like they hired the stupidgirl writers.
>
>
From the chibnall Era?
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to get
>> David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was lecture
>> him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>
>It’s like they hired the stupidgirl writers.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
Ubiquitous
Dec 2, 2023, 4:20:28 AM12/2/23
to
anim...@cox.net wrote:
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed
>> to get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did
>> was lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>
> It's like they hired the Stupidgirl writers.
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed
>> to get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did
>> was lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>
The less-talented ones, anyway.
The Doctor
Dec 2, 2023, 9:31:32 AM12/2/23
to
anim8rfsk
Dec 2, 2023, 11:34:15 AM12/2/23
to
>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>
>
The Doctor
Dec 2, 2023, 2:43:39 PM12/2/23
to
In article <1212536503.723227171.3...@news.easynews.com>,
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> anim...@cox.net wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed
>>>> to get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did
>>>> was lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>>>
>>> It's like they hired the Stupidgirl writers.
>>
>> The less-talented ones, anyway.
>
>I said that
>
>
Whatever.
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> anim...@cox.net wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed
>>>> to get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did
>>>> was lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=
>>>
>>> It's like they hired the Stupidgirl writers.
>>
>> The less-talented ones, anyway.
>
>I said that
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
Ubiquitous
Dec 6, 2023, 7:49:12 AM12/6/23
to
In article <ukdob4$1aid$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to
>>get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was
>>lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>>https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=4OoKluiVrNzTDChu
>
>Your reaction?
I agree with him.
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Wow, Doctor Who is an utter dumpster fire of a show. They even managed to
>>get David Tennant to come back for the Star Beast and all they did was
>>lecture him on the modern audience. What a complete and utter failure.
>>
>>https://youtu.be/jAAPSBfineU?si=4OoKluiVrNzTDChu
>
>Your reaction?
The Doctor
Dec 6, 2023, 11:16:36 AM12/6/23
to
0 new messages