Hi,
I have a few questions about this history setting in the database.
1) Does that mean it is not possible to run the engine with to different configurations like a processEngine and a "noHistoryProcessEngine", for example?
My intention is that both should use the same database tables if possible but for a defined workflow the engine should not save the variables.
2) Why is there a config-setting like <property name="history">full</property> if the entry in the database really defines the level.
I got an error while trying to set the level in the application-context.xml because it is different to the setting in the database.
Am I not allowed to change this setting for my configuration?
3) What does schema.history mean? Kann I add there different history schema?
Thanks for help.
+1
And next step is changing the default to false J
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "camunda BPM users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to camunda-bpm-us...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to camunda-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/camunda-bpm-users/d63655f7-061c-4814-aae3-87a20a6740b6%40googlegroups.com.
we could add a switch to the configuration "historyLevelCheckEnabled". Default is "true", if set to false this check would not be performed.