Haha, a bunch of aggro cards and then......
Edifice.
I decided to raise all of the red aggro cards and all 2-drops way up in my estimation for this draft and see what happened. I even almost took the 2-drop over the hydra p1p1. The result was a fairly easy 3-0 even through a mulligan to 5, which I won. I hate this format. It looks like it could be so sweet with the cycling and some of the build around cards, but in the end this deck is basically just what you should be drafting every time until 4 or more others at the table start doing the same thing. To clarify though, "this deck" could be RW as well. It's basically just the aggro exert deck with lots of late game "I win cards" or other cards that can force through damage.I might be done drafting the set online at this point. :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAM Magic" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cam-magic+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cam-magic+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
It's a shame that the environment is so polarized that Edifice can't even be effectively played in an aggressive deck. Looking at the Pro Tour coverage, it seems that you want to be in the Mardu shard (particularly red and white), and you only want to draft green or blue if you have a very good reason.
But it sounds as though draft and sealed formats are complete opposites, and you actually want to go for long games in sealed unless you have a terrifically aggressive pool.