On 29/08/2017 16:19, Glennbo wrote:
> In news:oo204g$i8p$
1...@news.albasani.net the killer robot John Braner
> <
m...@myhouse.com> grabbed the controls of the spaceship cakewalk.audio
> and pressed these buttons...
>
>>>> I've got a new song out. It's called "A Miracle" - you can check it
>>>> out here:
>>>>
https://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=13621549
>>>
>>> Cool song John. Dig the 60ish sounding tone and tremolo.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hi G'bo - thanks a lot for listening.
>>
>>
>>>> I've had to wait a little while, as I was using a beta copy of
>>>> Superior 3 an dhad to wait until it was announced ;-)
>>>
>>> I bring individual drum sounds out to the mixer in my DAW and do all
>>> the FX and mixing there, so I don't use the mixer or FX in Superior,
>>> plus I play Superior from my V-Drums, so I don't use any of the
>>> arranging or composing.
>>>
>>> Is there anything Superior 3 does better when using it like that?
>>>
>>
>> That's exactly what I do. The UI is revamped, and the new kits are
>> over 200GB (!), so it's worth it just for the new kits ;-)
>
> I'm pretty picky about drum sounds, so 200GB of sounds that I didn't select
> myself doesn't get me excited. I never ever use any of the Avatar samples
> that came with Superior 2. I still don't like the way they sound at all.
>
> I also hate it when software companies tout how much space they require as
> if that's always a good thing. Cakewalk used to really tick me off by
> filling my hard drive up with tons of stuff I didn't want or use.
>
> I'd buy a stripped down version of Superior 3 that had no mixing, no
> composing, but will load the *new* samples which I'm betting they will
> intentionally make incompatible with Superior 2. Let me buy the sound
> engine with nothing else, and then let me select the samples I want. :-)
>
>
Oh well, I guess you're not getting Superior 3 then ;-)
I figure bigger kits mean more articulations, round robins etc. Of course there are also way more
room and "surround" (really just more room mics spread around) mics too...