Hey guys, what do you think about replacing our implementation of CakeTime, CakeNumber and I18n with the functions provided by the intl extension?It seems like a common extension that is available in shared hosts like dreamhost and would really solve tons of problems in our own implementation. Now that we are taking the leap on 5.4, I don't think that introducing a dependency like this would hurt.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cakephp-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cakephp-core...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Yes please. There are some BC issues with the current implementation that make stuff a bit confusing and overly complicated.
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:28:30 AM UTC+2, José Lorenzo wrote:Hey guys, what do you think about replacing our implementation of CakeTime, CakeNumber and I18n with the functions provided by the intl extension?It seems like a common extension that is available in shared hosts like dreamhost and would really solve tons of problems in our own implementation. Now that we are taking the leap on 5.4, I don't think that introducing a dependency like this would hurt.
--
Hey guys, what do you think about replacing our implementation of CakeTime, CakeNumber and I18n with the functions provided by the intl extension?It seems like a common extension that is available in shared hosts like dreamhost and would really solve tons of problems in our own implementation. Now that we are taking the leap on 5.4, I don't think that introducing a dependency like this would hurt.
--
The intl PHP extension and the ICU library are great tools, but they are also a nightmare to install. To ease things a little bit, Bernhard created two new components: Icu and Intl.
--