You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to caffe...@googlegroups.com
I found that sometimes using Xavier init may result in the objective not converging, while using Gaussian init could get good performance. Is Xavier init really better than Gaussian init? Thank you.
Sergio Guadarrama
unread,
Jul 2, 2015, 2:11:53 PM7/2/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to caffe...@googlegroups.com
Good initialization depends on the problem as well on the network architecture. So there is not a single best initialization method.
You can also try MSRAFiller filler see [He, Zhang, Ren and Sun 2015]
Ihsan Ullah
unread,
Jul 4, 2015, 3:37:50 AM7/4/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to caffe...@googlegroups.com
As Sergio said it depends on the problem. One can not specifically says. How ever good initialization does effect convergence.
Are their only these two ways of initialization of weights? Or there exist other techniques already implemented in caffe that one can use? regards
ihsan
On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 9:07:34 AM UTC-7, Andy Wong wrote: