I don't use AA. It's useless for the type of work I do.
When I get caught up I'll try the upgrade and come back with what I've
found regarding importing and loading times.
Cheers,
Will
> 24 March 2015 12:52
>> On 24 Mar 2015, at 19:45, Will Helton<
will....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I mean when moving between segments. This takes about a minute each time. Longer than it takes me to translate the segment in a lot of cases.
>
> With AA enabled? Yes. You could also try to pretranslate, both real-time with the TMX version, and before you start translating using Total Recall.
>
>> No idea what you mean.
>
> Same here.
>
>> Yes, really. Perhaps you've not found this to be the case.
>
> No. I monitored things regularly, but even though CPU usage hit even higher than 150, no nasty consequences.
>
>> I'll give it a try.
>
> Please report. Also importing time.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hans
>
> Hans van den Broek <mailto:
ir...@indo.net.id>
> 24 March 2015 11:42
>> On 24 Mar 2015, at 18:05, Will Helton<
will....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've decided to give the EU DGT a try in CT as a tmx memory and am finding that it not only is slow to load
>
> Not really. On my old Mac, the 2 million segments DGT loads in a minute or two. 8 GB assigned to CafeTran/Java heap.
>
>> as I move between segments (hey, it's pretty big!),
>
> What do you mean? Auto-assemble is just about impossible. A search* is sort of acceptable.
>
>> but it also cranks up my CPU usage to well over 100% (average of about 115%).
>
> Really?
>
>> Is there a more system-friendly way to use this resource that would put a lower load on my laptop?
>
> Yes, the external database. Importing it takes a while (4 hours on my system for 2 million segments), but that's a one time affair. After that, it's readily available - no waiting time - and search is very fast. I recorded a *screencast of a search in both the TMX and the database (though that was still with H2 database, not the new SQLite).
>
>
http://www.screencast.com/t/95NPzHRJJIpn
>
> (only 26 seconds)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hans
>
> Will Helton <mailto:
will....@gmail.com>
> 24 March 2015 11:05
> I've decided to give the EU DGT a try in CT as a tmx memory and am
> finding that it not only is slow to load as I move between segments
> (hey, it's pretty big!), but it also cranks up my CPU usage to well
> over 100% (average of about 115%).
>
> Is there a more system-friendly way to use this resource that would
> put a lower load on my laptop?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will