Cm2 Spd Tool Crack Without Box

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Jon Levatte

unread,

Aug 3, 2024, 5:58:11 PM8/3/24

to caesponvili

I have two polygon layers that show the same waterway buffer for a large area but one is more extensive than the other. I want to subtract the smaller layer from the larger one so that I am left with the areas that are only covered by the larger. This seems like the type of problem that could be easily solved with the "erase tool" but I don't have access to that. The "select by location" seems to be a popular suggestion but I've played around with it and haven't gotten it to work. Also the two layers are not quite identical.

Use the Union tool and then select the set of features where the FID(s) of the polygon you want removed is -1. That will be the portion of the target polygon not overlapped by the other polygon. You can then export that shape, or use the Attribute Transfer tool to only transfer the geometry of the remainder parcel in the original feature class.

I want to use a single condition tool with an expression as shown to open/close containers. It seems to fail to work (without error) when running locally and fails from the gallery with a timeout error.

This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.

None of these tools require admin privileges, it's the file you want to patch is accessible only to admin. Look at the NTFS permissions for the file, I believe that you would find that only Administrators have rights to modify it.

UPDATE: We live, we learn. I was wrong, patch.exe does require elevation. Or more precisely, Windows thinks that it requires elevation: How to prevent Vista from requiring elevation on patch.exe?.

The git for Win32 package comes with a patch.exe program that doesn't request administrator privileges. The package is very easy to install, even for non-administrator users: there's a portable version that you only have to unpack anywhere and it's ready to use.

While renaming is certainly an option, most build systems automatically call 'patch', and expect this to be the same call for on all platforms. Thus leaving the original name is certainly desirable in scenarios where automation is required.

LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.

The plethora of productivity tools in the marketplace, from small single-user solutions up to enterprise wide platforms, creates an environment of confusion when it comes to implementation. Do these sound familiar:

Hello, is there any way to change the tool number of a tool without it updating the feeds and speeds associated with that tool? I know you can use the right click renumber tools or check the box in configuration to lock feedrates. Sometimes i have 2 or more toolpaths with the same tool but certain toolpaths the feed or speed is adjusted. Sometimes i want to change the tool number because the tool is already in the machine under a different tool number. So if i go to the tool edit tool page and change tool, length, and diameter to a different number and update it changes all the feeds and speeds of all the toolpaths with that tool. So any of the adjusted toolpaths feeds and speeds are erased and updated which i do not want.

You asking for a method that I am not aware you can do without using the lock feed and speeds what it was made for. The only way would be to have copies of the same tool in a file, but that would become a nightmare to manage IMHO.

I don't like to work with lock feedrates on. so for me to use that It would be a pain to go and change it just to change tool number, and then go change it back. Would be nice if when changing a tool number a dialog pops up asking you if you want to update feeds and speeds or not.

You can have as many speed and feed versions of the same tool as you want. Copy the original tool, adjust speeds and feeds as needed then save the tool with either the changed feed/speed or as what process that tool is created for.

I used to feel the same way, but have recently started working with the lock on. You can always right click on the tool and reset to the tool's parameters, which I use for drills and reamers. For everything else I use a speed and feed calculator to get the optimized parameters for each cut, as they're almost always different, so the parameters saved with the tool are irrelevant.

I hate working with files that have 15 of the same tool because there were that many needed to manage feeds and speeds. Just seems aweful messy. When I make an endmill I set the speeds and feeds in the tool file for the generic side milling application parameters in say a generic alloy steel, and then adapt that per what I am doing with it on the files I use it on.

My problem is this: say I have a 1/4 endmill and the toolpth is finishing a 3 inch boss. So for that I would just use the speeds and feeds associated with that tool. I have my tools organized for materials as far as the feeds and speeds go. So I can just open tool file for specific material and the speeds and feeds are generally good. But then I use that same tool to do a 3/8 hole which would need to be slowed down. So I just change the feedrate in the tool path parameters under the tool section.

So I work remotely and after the programming in Mastercam I send the file to the shop and that's the last I see it. Sometimes the guys at the shop want to change tool numbers for specific tools. So when they do that it changes that adjustment I made for the 3/8 da hole. Then I get feedback saying my speeds and feeds were way too fast. I could tell them to turn the lock feedrates on but the Mastercam users there don't like that on and I understand why. I don't either.

This is exactly the problem. Same thing happens if you go to tool manager and change it from there. It just makes me look bad to the customer. And for a remote worker that is not good. I need my work to be near flawless because it's hard to defend myself from 100's of miles away.

I don't understand what the issue with lock feedrates is. It's easy to pull the feed's and speed from teh tool if you have it, yes it is an extra click every now and again, but you never have to worry about losing your feeds and speeds.

Thanks for all the ideas. i think i will just have to encourage them to use the jparis method. I just wish any method used would prompt you to pick if you want to keep speeds and feeds or replace with default in tool parameters.

Yes and as a remote programmer I understand his frustration. End of the day hard to control things that we cannot control no matter how hard we try if there is a human involved on the other side we can never say 100% it will be correct. We can only do our best and cross the T's and dot the I's as best we can and go from there. I was going to make many of the suggestions made here, but seeing how I am called the meanest person on here some times I refrained. Press on and come up with some suggestions and examples and send them to QC and see what they say.

Our contract is pretty solid... Basically says the minute you get it from us it's your problem. That said, we do everything we can to help them make a project successful. We just can't be responsible for a machine crash, bad CAD geometry, forgotten features, poorly written posts, lack of properly vetted Vericut machine sim, or for lack of properly checking programs prior to running them on the machine.