You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CadQuery
As part of my work I have needed to create an ellipseArc whose ending angle is somewhere in the first quadrant. From extensive testing I have determined that when I have a calculated endpoint of the arc and calculate the central polar angle of the ellipse which corresponds, the endPoint vector of the ellipseArc does not match. If however I calculate the angle as eccentric anomaly, it does match. I can find no documentation of this anywhere in the CADQuery or openCASCADE documentation, nor could I find it from my forays into the source code of both. Is this an implicit assumption within geometry modeling? If desired I have example code proving this.
Adam Urbanczyk
unread,
Jun 7, 2024, 1:59:32 AMJun 7
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CadQuery
Yes, please provide an example.
Patrick Dees
unread,
Jun 7, 2024, 12:53:08 PMJun 7
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CadQuery
The attached notebook walks through definitions and creates plots of the topic and demonstrates my finding.
If you agree with it, all I recommend is a small update to the documentation of Workplane.ellipseArc.