that until 21208 was added to the CVC in 1976 there was no mandatory bike lane law in California? And perhaps there were no (or very few) bike lanes in California before 1976? As Serge replied

21202 and 21208, it limited mandatory bicycle licensing to residents and removed the authority of local agencies to impound unregistered bicycles (both of which had been subject

) and 21208 (MBL) were added? Why couldn't the restrictions on bicycles be added while bikes were still with the animals in 21050? BTW, §21208 (MBL) came later (1976), because bike

21207.5, 21208, and 21209). Lots of people aren't sure what a bike lane is. In (b)(7), "adjacent" is too restrictive. I suggest something like "where an official

David Whiteman wrote: > For the benefit of the one person on here who does not understand how > the California legislature work... Why does the

, > 21208, 21209 and 21717. > Guidance: > The Bike Lane (R81(CA)) sign should be placed at every arterial street > and at 800 m (1/2 mi) intervals of each designated Bike lane