
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/466446579.1009816.1628723690041%40mail.yahoo.com.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH7jOHi%2BNpQQRmdjznTV94Eq3Xy5o11TfkMVtz0em0kZmQ%40mail.gmail.com.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:50 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH5rqva-WaskW%2BtjbuQSTSU5tLhr-MZZOo8vgAxG_ohW_Q%40mail.gmail.com.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:11 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH4G_jMaLS6wzg6vgtpeAeubvsH_y4BmutaDX08KKV%2BOGw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/1436291246.895933.1628728222169%40mail.yahoo.com.
On Aug 11, 2021, at 4:32 PM, Serge Issakov <serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes! (Pete’s sharrow next to bike lane)
<IMG_8086.jpg>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:29 PM Serge Issakov <serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Judy,Most of that is beside the point.What specifically disallows placing a sharrow next to a bike lane where cyclists are likely to leave the bike lane per 02 and, say, CVC 21208(a)(4)?I think Pete’s example is a good one too. Placing sharrows at the entrance to a roundabout makes sense, including before the bike lane ends creating an overlap mixing section where cyclists can be expected to be in the bike lane or in the travel lane depending on conditions.Serge
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:22 PM Judy Frankel <judyf...@att.net> wrote:
No. Just tell them to learn to ride a bike and read cvc 21208. If.there is a bike lane the road is wide enough to share. Leave the bike lane where a turn is indicated or to be in the lane corresponding to your direction of travel. you can't depend on paint. Of if there is physical separation it's not a bike lane and can have sharrows. If.the bike lane ends completely and.the lane is too narrow to share.you can have sharrows. Both side by side is confusing and not allowed. Lets not keep adding paint for every situation. That is not the solution. Stopping.putting bollards in class 2 without notice and fixing class 4 standards is a better solution
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I know CA MUTCD 9B.06 01 says BMUFL(and sharrows per 03) may be used where no bike lanes are present.
<IMG_0083.jpeg>
But look at 02. It’s simply, “where it’s important to inform road users that bicyclists might occupy the travel lane”. No limitation regarding “no bicycle lanes”.So if bicyclists are likely to leave a bike lane and occupy the travel lane due to, say, an upcoming place where right turns are authorized, is it compliant to place sharrows in that travel lane adjacent to the bike lane?Serge--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH5cx3m6N6F-S2r5Tx_VK0g7szBtL-WLL2QUc8oa%2BEtXjw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH7jOHi%2BNpQQRmdjznTV94Eq3Xy5o11TfkMVtz0em0kZmQ%40mail.gmail.com.


On Aug 11, 2021, at 4:50 PM, Serge Issakov <serge....@gmail.com> wrote:Got it. Thanks.<IMG_8087.jpeg>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:40 PM Pete Penseyres <cyclo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The sharrow in that picture is after the dashed part of the Bike Lane NB, not the one SB.
That's a bike lane ending. The sharrow is next.to a class 4. That.goes up.onto the sidewalk Thats no longer a class 2 as a class.2 must end before the sidewalk. They haven't marked the transition
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes! (Pete’s sharrow next to bike lane)
<IMG_8086.jpg>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:29 PM Serge Issakov <serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Judy,Most of that is beside the point.What specifically disallows placing a sharrow next to a bike lane where cyclists are likely to leave the bike lane per 02 and, say, CVC 21208(a)(4)?I think Pete’s example is a good one too. Placing sharrows at the entrance to a roundabout makes sense, including before the bike lane ends creating an overlap mixing section where cyclists can be expected to be in the bike lane or in the travel lane depending on conditions.Serge
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:22 PM Judy Frankel <judyf...@att.net> wrote:
No. Just tell them to learn to ride a bike and read cvc 21208. If.there is a bike lane the road is wide enough to share. Leave the bike lane where a turn is indicated or to be in the lane corresponding to your direction of travel. you can't depend on paint. Of if there is physical separation it's not a bike lane and can have sharrows. If.the bike lane ends completely and.the lane is too narrow to share.you can have sharrows. Both side by side is confusing and not allowed. Lets not keep adding paint for every situation. That is not the solution. Stopping.putting bollards in class 2 without notice and fixing class 4 standards is a better solution
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Serge Issakov<serge....@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I know CA MUTCD 9B.06 01 says BMUFL(and sharrows per 03) may be used where no bike lanes are present.
<IMG_0083.jpeg>
But look at 02. It’s simply, “where it’s important to inform road users that bicyclists might occupy the travel lane”. No limitation regarding “no bicycle lanes”.So if bicyclists are likely to leave a bike lane and occupy the travel lane due to, say, an upcoming place where right turns are authorized, is it compliant to place sharrows in that travel lane adjacent to the bike lane?Serge--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH5cx3m6N6F-S2r5Tx_VK0g7szBtL-WLL2QUc8oa%2BEtXjw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH7jOHi%2BNpQQRmdjznTV94Eq3Xy5o11TfkMVtz0em0kZmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/1318002778.19747.1628724917692%40mail.yahoo.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CABOforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to caboforum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/caboforum/CAEy9bH5rqva-WaskW%2BtjbuQSTSU5tLhr-MZZOo8vgAxG_ohW_Q%40mail.gmail.com.