Lightbox for full-sized images
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Tom Keays
May 15, 2011, 4:43:23 PM5/15/11
to c4lj-d...@googlegroups.com
I have a cosmetic enhancement suggestion for the Journal. Many of our articles have embedded images that are thumbnails linking to the full-sized version.
E.G,, http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/4134#fig1
I was reading an online article today and realized that they were handling this more elegantly, where the linked image opens in a modal window or "lightbox" on the same page.
E.G., http://tidbits.com/article/12156
The technique uses a script to open the image in the modal window (usually written using a jQuery or Prototype/Scriptaculous library) and degrades gracefully to a more normal image link (like we're already using) when JavaScript is not available (or otherwise messes up).
There would be a small amount of overhead/work in converting our articles, in that most of these scripts require an identifier (e.g., rel="lightbox" or similar) to designate the images that require this handling.
Tom
E.G,, http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/4134#fig1
I was reading an online article today and realized that they were handling this more elegantly, where the linked image opens in a modal window or "lightbox" on the same page.
E.G., http://tidbits.com/article/12156
The technique uses a script to open the image in the modal window (usually written using a jQuery or Prototype/Scriptaculous library) and degrades gracefully to a more normal image link (like we're already using) when JavaScript is not available (or otherwise messes up).
There would be a small amount of overhead/work in converting our articles, in that most of these scripts require an identifier (e.g., rel="lightbox" or similar) to designate the images that require this handling.
Tom
Jonathan Rochkind
May 16, 2011, 10:26:12 AM5/16/11
to c4lj-d...@googlegroups.com, Tom Keays
We still have very limited 'technical staff' -- ie, any volunteers
interested in making such improvements, or generally coordinating
our WordPress install.
People seemed somewhat ambivelent to my previous proposal to try and recruit a Technical Editor/Coordinator/Manager to be point person on the WordPress install and coordinate development/maintenance there.
In addition to needing just person hours to develop new features like this, I think we do need a 'buck stops here' person -- if we end up with different ephemeral volunteers adding different features, we'll end up with an install that nobody really understands en toto or bottomlines, and nobody has responsibilty/expertise for trouble-shooting when it goes wrong.
People seemed somewhat ambivelent to my previous proposal to try and recruit a Technical Editor/Coordinator/Manager to be point person on the WordPress install and coordinate development/maintenance there.
In addition to needing just person hours to develop new features like this, I think we do need a 'buck stops here' person -- if we end up with different ephemeral volunteers adding different features, we'll end up with an install that nobody really understands en toto or bottomlines, and nobody has responsibilty/expertise for trouble-shooting when it goes wrong.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Code4Lib Journal-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to c4lj-d...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to c4lj-discuss...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/c4lj-discuss?hl=en.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages