Dear friends,
I wish to seek out researchers who may be engaged in analyzing how Panini
maps space, time and depth in the preparation of grammar. Some modern
grammarians label Panini as the best "descriptive grammarian" and marvel
at his techniques, brevity and mathematics. There is a tendency to think that
the language is a mechanical assembly of phonemes organized to make speech.
Panini derives his grammar from the raw human speech and the word formation
is organic. Human expression is the detection of an action or the description of
an observation. This fundamental division of cognition to detection and
description becomes the basis of Paninian science. Both of these conditions
lead to verbs which have to be established in time and space. Any event has
many more dimensions as to agency, support, likelihood, expectation, effect
and reaction. These probably were discovered later through analysis.
Panini creates a framework through which the complete simulation of nature
is possible and we can wander in a linguistic universe. The linguistic universe
is perceptually similar to the real universe though it is much limited and made
out of discrete parts. Panini creates rules on how these discrete parts may
combine to give the feel of the "analog" natural universe.
I have updated the website to mark an hour for this discussion.
If you are a Panini student and observe human speech, you would appreciate
participation.
Best regards,
Bijoy Misra