Re: Bahlika

87 views
Skip to first unread message

navaratna rajaramnavaratna

unread,
Nov 4, 2010, 10:21:52 AM11/4/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Vahlika or Bahlika was the name of the country later called Bactria by the Greeks. They were related by marriage to the Kurus and other royal families. If my memory serves me right, their king Bhurishravas was killed by Arjuna in the MB War as he was about to kill Satyaki.
 
N.S. Rajaram

2010/11/4 S P Narang <spna...@yahoo.com>
Sir, will you please write on the identity of Barbara as a tribe, land, caste or anything else. it is frequently referred to in the MBH and the Puranas. Please also write, if there is a reference to an alternative name of the Hunas? Regards, spnarang


From: "gira...@juno.com" <gira...@juno.com>
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 3, 2010 6:10:22 AM
Subject: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: {&#2349;&#2366;&#2352;&#2340;&#2368;&#2351;&#2357;&#2367;&#2342;&# 2381;&#2357;&#2340;&#2381;&#2346;&#2352;&#2367;&#2359;&#2340;&#2381;} BMAC

Nov.2, 2010
Respected Scholars, Namaskar!
 
Ancient name of Bactria
 
Dear Dr. D. Bhattacarya, Thanks for your information. You are right. I do not believe many conclusions of Prof. Witzel. Now here is my information on Bactria.
 
From the book of Savitri Saxena
Page 104. Dr Raychaudhuri places Kurus in Vahlika (Bactria) and not within any territory in India proper. Mahabharata refers to Vahlika PrAtipeya who was the second son of the Kuru king Prateepa. He was paternal uncle of Bhees’ma. Vahlika and Madra were sister provinces. Kuru, Kamboja, Shaka, Vahlika and Madra and Stree Rajya were outside the boundaries of the subcontinent.
At the time of Mahabharat, there was no Pakistan, Afghanistan, Persia, Iran. There were kingdoms including India. Kingdom of Magadha was the most powerful because of Jarasandha.
Please understand that this information does not demote the ancient history of Mahabharata or Bharata. Behind the history of Mahabharata, the history of the whole Eurasia is hidden. Thanks. N. R. Joshi


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattach...@yahoo.com>
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} BMAC
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:02:17 +0530 (IST)

Bactria was balihika(AV. Paippalâda-Saṃhitâ),bahl/lhika(AV Úaunakîya-Saṃ.). There was an Indian name, perhaps Vâhlîka. The two are sometimes confused. The AV might have known of Bactria from traders. Witzel speaks of some direct connexion of the AV with Bactria but that is a wrong inference. Discussions on this have been made by me twice – in 2005 (Indische Kultur im Kontext : Ed. Lars Göhler, Harrassowitz, 2005) and Introduction AVP Vol.3, Asiatic Society, Kolkata (to be out this month or the next.)

Best

DB



--- On Mon, 1/11/10, gira...@juno.com <gira...@juno.com> wrote:

From: gira...@juno.com <gira...@juno.com>
Subject: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} BMAC
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, 1 November, 2010, 12:26 AM

October 31, 2010
 
Respected Scholars, Namaskar!
 
 
Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex
 
Reference-Posting of Dr. D. Bhattacharya dated Oct 27 on this list.
 
I am glad Dr. Bhattacharya, you brought up the subject of BMAC. We had discussion on this topic last year in Dec. 2009. I have the paper of Dr. B.B. Lal-His Inaugural address at the 19th International Conference on South Asian Archaeology,Italy, 2007. He does not go to the ancient names of Bactria and Margiana. So I am asking question first to Shree Arun Upadhaya, then to you and then to other scholars-what were the ancient names of Bactria and Margiana at the time of the epic war? It is said that the name Bactria was given by Greeks. Margiana is Merv (Turkmenistan) of the known history. However I am looking for ancient names.
The idea is to understand Mahabharat history. Thanks. N.R.Joshi.
____________________________________________________________
Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat!
--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)

 

 

--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)



____________________________________________________________
Globe Life Insurance
$1* Buys $50,000 Life Insurance. Adults or Children. No Medical Exam.
CoverageFor1Dollar.com

--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)

--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)

Arun

unread,
Nov 6, 2010, 2:20:08 AM11/6/10
to भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्
In Bhavishya purana, Pratisarga Parva and various tantra Texts like
Shakti-sangama, bahlika is identified as Balkha town in Persia. King
Bhoja of Malva had gone to Bahlika with 10000 troops, when Prophet
Mohammed saought his help. many among his army helped in his crusade-
who were called Mohyali as per Islamic History published by Ahmedia
sect-Arun

On Nov 4, 7:21 pm, navaratna rajaramnavaratna


<rajaramnavara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vahlika or Bahlika was the name of the country later called Bactria by the
> Greeks. They were related by marriage to the Kurus and other royal families.
> If my memory serves me right, their king Bhurishravas was killed by Arjuna
> in the MB War as he was about to kill Satyaki.
>
> N.S. Rajaram
>

> 2010/11/4 S P Narang <spnar...@yahoo.com>


>
>
>
> >  Sir, will you please write on the identity of Barbara as a tribe, land,
> > caste or anything else. it is frequently referred to in the MBH and the
> > Puranas. Please also write, if there is a reference to an alternative name
> > of the Hunas? Regards, spnarang
>

> >  ------------------------------
> > *From:* "girav...@juno.com" <girav...@juno.com>
> > *To:* bvpar...@googlegroups.com
> > *Sent:* Wed, November 3, 2010 6:10:22 AM
> > *Subject:* {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re:

> >   Bactria was *balihika*(AV. Paippalâda-Saṃhitâ),*bahl/lhika*(AV


> > Úaunakîya-Saṃ.). There was an Indian name, perhaps Vâhlîka. The two are
> > sometimes confused. The AV might have known of Bactria from traders. Witzel
> > speaks of some direct connexion of the AV with Bactria but that is a wrong
> > inference. Discussions on this have been made by me twice – in 2005
> > (Indische Kultur im Kontext : Ed. Lars Göhler, Harrassowitz, 2005) and
> > Introduction AVP Vol.3, Asiatic Society, Kolkata (to be out this month or the
> > next.)
>
> > Best
>
> > DB
>

> > --- On *Mon, 1/11/10, girav...@juno.com <girav...@juno.com>* wrote:


>
> > From: girav...@juno.com <girav...@juno.com>
> > Subject: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} BMAC
> > To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
> > Date: Monday, 1 November, 2010, 12:26 AM
>
> >  October 31, 2010
>
> > Respected Scholars, Namaskar!
>
> > Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex
>
> > Reference-Posting of Dr. D. Bhattacharya dated Oct 27 on this list.
>
> > I am glad Dr. Bhattacharya, you brought up the subject of BMAC. We had
> > discussion on this topic last year in Dec. 2009. I have the paper of Dr.
> > B.B. Lal-His Inaugural address at the 19th International Conference on South
> > Asian Archaeology,Italy, 2007. He does not go to the ancient names of
> > Bactria and Margiana. So I am asking question first to Shree Arun Upadhaya,
> > then to you and then to other scholars-what were the ancient names of
> > Bactria and Margiana at the time of the epic war? It is said that the name
> > Bactria was given by Greeks. Margiana is Merv (Turkmenistan) of the known
> > history. However I am looking for ancient names.
> > The idea is to understand Mahabharat history. Thanks. N.R.Joshi.
> > ____________________________________________________________

> > Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat!<http://www.juno.com/freeemail?refcd=JUTAGOUT1FREM0210>


> > --
> > अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
> > ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
> > तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
> > निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
>
> > --
> > अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
> > ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
> > तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
> > निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
>
> > ____________________________________________________________

> > *Globe Life Insurance*


> > $1* Buys $50,000 Life Insurance. Adults or Children. No Medical Exam.

> > <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/4cd0afb237a6d23a9bst06vuc>
> > CoverageFor1Dollar.com<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/4cd0afb237a6d23a9bst06vuc>


>
> > --
> > अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
> > ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
> > तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
> > निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
>
> > --
> > अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
> > ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
> > तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।

> > निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

S P Narang

unread,
Nov 6, 2010, 3:19:11 AM11/6/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the information. Regards, spnarang

> > {भारतीयविद&#
> > 2381;वत्परिषत्} BMAC

Dr. T. Ganesan

unread,
Nov 6, 2010, 10:01:27 AM11/6/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Sri Arun wrote:
King
Bhoja of Malva had gone to Bahlika with 10000 troops, when Prophet
Mohammed saought his help. many among his army helped in his crusade-
who were called Mohyali as per Islamic History published by Ahmedia
sect.
But historically King Bhoja of Malva is said to have ruled in the 9th century
while Mohammad lived in 6th century......... How is it possible, then, Bhoja
helped with his armies,,,,,,
We have to take this informations carefully.
Ganesan

subrahmanyam korada

unread,
Nov 7, 2010, 11:33:34 PM11/7/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
namo vidvadbhyah

BAhlika / BAhlIka -- BAhIka -VAhIka

Amarakosa says (2-Vaisya) bAhlikam is Asaphotida / Hingu -

sahasravedhi jatukam bAhlikam hingu ramatham - here the derivation is
- the one that has come from the country - bAhlika . RAmatham means -
the one that has come from the country
'rama.tha .
The other meaning of BAhlikam / BahkIkam is saffron ( from 'bahlikadesa' ) -
Amara - 2- Manusya - kasmIrajanmAgnisikham varam bahlikapItanam

Still another meaning is - the horse from "BAhlikadesa' -
Amara - 2- Ksatriya - vanAyujah pArasIkAh kAmbhoja bAhlikA hayAh
Amara - NAnArtha - bAhlikam rama.the'pi ca.

PAninisUtram - vAhIkagrAmebhyasca (4-2-117) - KaumudI - bAhIkagrAmebhyasca .
Under 'dityadityAdityapatyuttarapadA.n.nyah ' ( 4-1-85) -
VArtikam - bahi.sa.s.tilopo yan(ca) ca -- bahirbhavo bAhyah .
VArtikam - Ikak ca -- bAhIkah .
VArtikam - Ikan(ca) chandasi -- bAhIkamastu bhadram vah .

Under 'avyayAttyap' ( 4-2-104) , Patanjali offers names of some
VAhIkagrAmas --
ArAt , kAstIrah , dAsarUpyam , sAkalam , sausukam .

The people of VAhIkadesa are considered to be 'adhamAdhikArinah' ,
that'swhy the popular example - gauh vAhIkah , gAm pAthaya (Patanjali)
.

I do not know as what the term is that is used for Prophet Mohammad in
PurAnas but one should be very careful in such matters --
on 27/11/2008 (significant)I was invited by a Muslim Organization to
represent Hindu Religion
(also someone to speak on Christianity) . The Muslim speaker quoted
Ravisankar and said
that a Sanskrit word in Vedas (all) refers to Mohammad and there were
so many such Prophets
earlier , i.e. since time immemorial .
Pundit Ravisankar should have not said so .

dhanyo'smi


--
Prof.Korada Subrahmanyam
Professor of Sanskrit,
CALTS,
University of Hyderabad 500046
Ph:09866110741(R),91-40-23010741,040-23133660(O)

Dipak Bhattacharya

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 6:42:03 AM11/20/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

20 11 10

Dear and Esteemed Colleagues,

I request you to consider a few points raised below by me.

Will it be quite fruitful to try to find evidence about Bactria from Puranic statements. As has been established by several scholars, Vedic evidence is more dependable than Puranic because of the continuous re-edition and recasting of the latter. Did not the Mahabharata, according to its own statement, exist first in 8800, then in 24000 and finally in 100000 verses? What Sukthankar had at hand was even larger so that he admittedly tried to reach as near as possible to the said Śatasāhasrīsṃhitā and not further beyond.  For such reasons the Atharvavedic evidence appears to me to be of maximum importance in determining the relation between Bactria and mainland India.

According to that Bactria was a cursed land plagued with diseases causing remittent fever. It was indeed the homeland of takman that is fever. This picture fits into the known pre-history of the land. Bactria, born of the alluvial soil of the two biggest rivers of Central Asia, is a fertile land. Before the introduction of iron implements it had to be, like the Terai region, the favorable breeding ground of malaria and kala-azar. For this reason the Atharvaveda knows it as a cursed land, though its evidences speak for traders of the Vedic age keeping contact with the land. That would be natural as Indian glass made way to Iran, most probably through Bactria that was on the Silk-Route.

But it was never the coveted land for the Vedic people. The soldiers left by retreating Alexander might have somewhat changed the landscape when the actual iron-age history of Bactria began. Any golden age of Bactria before that, and even after, has to be regarded as myth.

Indeed there remains the BMAC to take account of. The facts gathered by me from the reports of   several excavations (French, Soviet) carried on from the seventies till the early eighties pertain to  pre-iron age  settlements based on harrow-cultivation that came to an end around 1500 BCE. How does one relate that to the out and out iron-age production that is the Mahābhārata. I do not deny that the Mbh and the Purāṇas may have recorded memories of lost pre-iron-age civilizations but it is erroneous to see them as contemporaneous with the reported “Lost Atlantean” civilizations.

I note some postings on iron in India in the third millennium BC. I shall be glad to have evidences. Till now the majority opinion favours its origin in iron-smelting factories of the Hittite empire. After the dissolution of the Hittite empire (1200 BCE) the secret techniques were carried to faraway lands including India. Without strong evidence to the contrary the theory of any other origin has to regarded as less dependable. But I WILL see them as authentic. None will be gladder that me if that happens.

Best wishes

DB

 

--- On Thu, 4/11/10, navaratna rajaramnavaratna <rajaramn...@gmail.com> wrote:

S. Kalyanaraman

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 6:54:00 AM11/20/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Dipak Bhattacharya

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 9:52:24 AM11/20/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
C14 dating is possible with organic matter. How can that apply to iron?
Best
DB

--- On Sat, 20/11/10, S. Kalyanaraman <kaly...@gmail.com> wrote:

S. Kalyanaraman

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 10:31:35 AM11/20/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Organic matter is used during the smelting processes and archaeologists penetrate a site in stratigraphic layers and do c14 dating etc. to pin down the possible dates when the people in the settlement engaged in smelting operations. 

kalyan


2010/11/20 Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattach...@yahoo.com>

S P Narang

unread,
Nov 22, 2010, 8:12:47 PM11/22/10
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
It is very correct that the MBH and the Puranas are trying to collect the material including the geographical and sociological from various sources including the oral. Most of the themes are lost in due course of time and should be collected from various sources including the Buddhist and Jains and scattered in Tibet and Chinese. I remeber an important custum of Panjab recited at Lohri(Sundari Mundri) which had its origin in China and Tibet and came to Panjab and available even today. It may be available in full or part  in any language in idiom or practice. The custom of Siappa from Oxus is in Panjab today which is found to some extent in Striiparvan of the MBH and Rudaalii in Rajasthan and other regions. Thanks to Vyasa who tried to collect the heritage at one place. Regards, spnarang


From: Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattach...@yahoo.com>
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 5:12:03 PM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Bahlika
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages