Etymology of the word Guru

135 views
Skip to first unread message

Narayan Joshi

unread,
Feb 15, 2017, 9:05:03 PM2/15/17
to bvparishat

Feb 15, 2017,

Dear Prof. S Korada,

Saadara PraNaam!

About a month ago you posted etymology of the word ‘Guru” saying Gu means Andhahkaara and Ru means to dispel that. Here meanings are attached to syllables (Gu and Ru). Is there mention of attaching meanings to  “syllables” in any of the ancient books like Nirukta? How did you think of these meanings-any grammatical process involved?  Please pardon me for asking this question. My only purpose is to learn from you.  As you know my interest is in VarNavAda.Thanks. NRJOSHI.

V Subrahmanian

unread,
Feb 15, 2017, 9:51:14 PM2/15/17
to BHARATIYA VIDVAT
Namaste

Can we add a few more popular such derivatives:

durgā: durgati-nāśini

ककाररूपा कल्याणी कल्याणगुणशालिनी

गं गणपतये 

शं करॊतीति 

kṛṣṇa: Here one can fine more than one derivatives:


It looks like one can devise one's own derivation in every case. There appears to be no norm in this. For 'Rāma' too there are such letter-based derivatives.

Scholars may throw more light on this niyama or absence of niyama.

regards
subrahmanian.v 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Dr BVK Sastry

unread,
Feb 15, 2017, 11:14:54 PM2/15/17
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Namaste

 

Please, May I be helped to understand why the ‘ names’ and sound/ varna-letters’ in names  must always be stretched to a ‘ artha –nirvachana’ = meaning elucidation ?

 

This effort would be understandable if the ‘ terms such as ‘ganapati’ are used for dhyana and ‘ mantra-japa’. 

 

It is true that Vaidika-Shabdas are associated with a lot more tags that are considered in Pratishaakhya and Viniyoga directives; but then , they are not treated as ‘ mantra-akshara beejas’. Nor the generic meaning and function-action association is always given.

 

For example, the word ‘ashwa’  for horse is explained. But would a similar explanation go for  ‘haya, turangama’ also ?

 

May be there was a hidden wisdom in the ‘Samjnaa’ proprosition and ‘ concept of ‘ samjna-praamaanayat’ by Panini .

Look for more illuminating exchange of information .

 

Regards

BVK Sastry

 

From: bvpar...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bvpar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of V Subrahmanian
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 9:51 PM
To: BHARATIYA VIDVAT
Subject: Re: {
भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Etymology of the word Guru

 

Namaste

 

Can we add a few more popular such derivatives:

 

durgā: durgati-nāśini

 

ककाररूपा कल्याणी कल्याणगुणशालिनी

 

गं गणपतये 

 

शं करॊतीति 

 

kṛṣṇa: Here one can fine more than one derivatives:

 

 

It looks like one can devise one's own derivation in every case. There appears to be no norm in this. For 'Rāma' too there are such letter-based derivatives.

 

Scholars may throw more light on this niyama or absence of niyama.

 

regards

subrahmanian.v 

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Narayan Joshi <girav...@gmail.com> wrote:

Feb 15, 2017,

Dear Prof. S Korada,

Saadara PraNaam!

About a month ago you posted etymology of the word ‘Guru” saying Gu means Andhahkaara and Ru means to dispel that. Here meanings are attached to syllables (Gu and Ru). Is there mention of attaching meanings to  “syllables” in any of the ancient books like Nirukta? How did you think of these meanings-any grammatical process involved?  Please pardon me for asking this question. My only purpose is to learn from you.  As you know my interest is in VarNavAda.Thanks. NRJOSHI.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

Rajendra Gupta

unread,
Feb 16, 2017, 11:57:38 AM2/16/17
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Namaste.

If we believe in quite a few of the traditional etymologies, it would appear that the linguists came first and the words later, which can not be true. For example, if the etymology of the word ‘guru' गुरु is gu + ru where "Gu means 'Andhahkaara' and Ru means to 'dispel that'," it would imply that the word guru गुरु was coined by some philosopher-linguist. During my imaginary walks with our pre-historic ancestors, I have tried to read their minds to find the origin and evolution of words. My theorem on the origin and evolution of the word guru गुरु and its associated word such as AchArya आचार्य, teacher, sir, shri श्री, rajA राजा, surya सूर्य, hari हरि, hara हर, hero etc. is as follows.  
  • Sound of chirping of sparrow is chya च्य / chir चिर / chirya चिर्य. Sound of crow's caw is kak-kak काक-काक. 
  • Therefore sparrow is called chiriya चिरिया and crow is called kaka काक. 
  • Prehistoric humans believed that the Sun is a bird. Hence names of Sun are based on sound of birds.  e.g. a word for Sun is khaga खग (<kaka काक). Other common words for bird and Sun are patanga पतंग, pakshina पक्षिन and pUshaN पूषण (< pakshin पक्षिन). 
  • In the same way the word Surya सूर्य is derived from chiya चिया / chiriyaa  चिरिया a word for sparrow,
  • chiya चिया > jua (word for Sun in Swahili). Chirya >  churya > jurya > jurava (Swahili word for sparrow). 
  • chiriya> jiriya > siriya > surya सूर्य (I have tried to derive 77 words for Sun in 65 different languages of the world from chiriya चिरिया and khaga खग. Ref. Why our ancestors might have called the Sun as Sun हमारे पुरखों ने सूरज को सूरज क्यों कहा होगा  http://dnaofwords.blogspot.in/search?q=sun)
  • Both Sun and fire have light and heat. Therefore, words for fire might have been derived from the words for Sun.In fact, the words peru पेरू is used for both Sun and fire. peru पेरू > feru > fire  
  • Surya सूर्य > jurya > jyura >  jwara ज्वर > jwala ज्वल  
  • Because the first Guru गुरु of the world would have been the person who was expert in lighting a fire and to teach others to do so, therefore, the word guru गुरु might have been derived from the word for fire. jwala ज्वल (fire)> jwalu ज्वलु (one who can ignite fire) > gyaru ग्यरू > guru गुरु. 
  • The guru गुरु who had the expertise and control over fire must have been head of the group. Therefore, Jwara ज्वर > chyara > chajara > caesar/ czar.
  • jwara ज्वर > rajwa रज्व > rajya रज्य  > raja राज > raja राजा. That would mean the guru and raja were the same person in the times of our pre-historic ancestors. 
  • jwari ज्वरी > shyri श्य्री > shri श्री /sr स्री i/siri सीरी / sir सर 
  • Shri श्री > shari शरी > hari हरि / hara हर. 
  • shri श्री > hari हरि > hero 
  • Surya सूर्य / jurya > churya > charya चार्य > Acharya आचार्य > adhi अधि + Acharya  आचार्य > adhicharya अधिचार्य > dhicharya धिचार्य > diicharya  दिचार्य  > teacharya टिचार्य > teacher. 

Best regards 
Rajendra Gupta


_________
डा॰ राजेंद्र गुप्ता, 16 /32 प्रथम तल, राजेंद्र नगर, नई दिल्ली - 110060; फ़ोन: (मोबाईल) + 91 9212204551
Dr. Rajendra Gupta, 16/32 First Floor, Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi-110060; Phone: Mobile: + 91 9212204551
Blog: DNA of Words शब्दों का डीएनए  http://dnaofwords.blogspot.com/


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Narayan Joshi

unread,
Feb 17, 2017, 7:54:07 PM2/17/17
to bvparishat
Feb 17, 2017
Dear BVK, Namaste!
Your perspective is from Mantra science, Japa, Yoga to look at the Sanskrit words used in Vedas and in related spiritual books. However there are hundreds of words of secular nature in Sanskrit. These are names of instruments used (example-Cakra, MaNi-Mekhalaa, Krakara-ParNa, Ulukhala) in the ancient times. If one limits himself to Sanskrit of religious scriptures, it is his choice. VarNavaada tries to cover all kinds of words.

And VarNavaada is not a new subject. Many ancient achaaryas were in favor of VarNavaada. This has been discussed by me on BVP many times. Mine is New VarNavaada based on physical properties of letter-sounds. It simply brings out internal beauty of Sanskrit and Indian culture.

So my research and development of the subject goes on. Recently I read books on Nirukta. Certain things I posted from those books here on BVP. I will post soon about the ancient Aks'ara (syllable) vaada. 

 Right from the ancient BrahmaNa granthas, Brahmins and scholars were interested in etymology because language undergoes changes constantly. Yaaska knew this.

It is always interesting in exchanging ideas with scholars like you on BVP. As I posted earlier, there is discussion on the ancient VarNavaada on pages-82 t0 85 of the book of Prof Korada. Thanks NRJOSHI.


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Rajkumari Trikha

unread,
Feb 19, 2017, 10:10:33 AM2/19/17
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Sh. Rajendra Gupta's DNA of skt words is logical to some extent, but it is applicable to  some words only.

>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.


>> To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>  
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.


>> To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.


>> To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

Mārcis Gasūns

unread,
Feb 22, 2017, 7:59:25 AM2/22/17
to भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्


On Sunday, 19 February 2017 18:10:33 UTC+3, Rajkumari Trikha wrote:

Sh. Rajendra Gupta's DNA of skt words is logical to some extent, but it is applicable to  some words only.

On Feb 16, 2017 10:27 PM, "Rajendra Gupta" <rajen...@gmail.com> wrote:


It does contain some logic, but it has nothing to do with the history of language. For that knowledge of Sanskrit might not just be enough. 

Subrahmanyam Korada

unread,
Feb 22, 2017, 11:53:18 AM2/22/17
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
नमो विद्वद्भ्यः
Is there mention of attaching meanings to  “syllables” in any of the ancient books like Nirukta? How did you think of these meanings-any grammatical process involved?
                 ---- Vidvan Narayan Joshi


If you take वेदान्त  nobody prescribes any specific path for a मोक्षार्थी --

न हि एतत् शास्त्रेण केनचित् प्रतिपादितम् मोक्षार्थी इत्थं समाचरेत् इति !

                                               ब्रह्मसूत्रशाङ्करभाष्यम् 4-3-14

There will be different ways even in वेद - नेति नेति वादः etc . But the goal is the same and ब्रह्मन् is अनिर्वचनीयम् ( खण्डनखण्डखाद्यम् of श्रीहर्ष ) - you cannot offer an answer at a satisfactory level.

The same is the case in व्याकरणम् also --

उपादायापि ये हेयाः तान् उपायान् प्रचक्षते ।
उपायानां च नियमः नावश्यम् अवतिष्ठते ॥ वाक्यपदीयम् , वाक्यकाण्डः 38

What is उपाय ? 

उपा ( दाय हे ) यः - a device taken up for some purpose and left behind .
There is no any norm that a device should be like this and this.

ज्योतिषम् -- अ ( होरा ) त्रम् -- बृहज्जातकम् ।

पाणिनिः ----         राम +स् ; भू अ ति
शाकटायनः -----    राम + रु ; भू अति
शाकल्यः  ---------  राम + रि ; भव ति

आयुर्वेद discusses eight things -- शल्यम् , शालाक्यम् etc .

योगानुशासनम् discusses eight things -- यम - नियम etc

पाणिनीयम्  discusses eight things ---

1. शब्दः -- 1.प्रकृतिप्रत्ययौ 2. पदवाक्ये 

2. अर्थः -- 1. प्रकृतिप्रत्ययार्थौ  2.पदवाक्यार्थौ

3. शब्दार्थयोः संबन्धः -- 1. कार्यकारणभावः 2.योग्यता

4. प्रयोजनम्  --- 1. अर्थज्ञानम्  2. धर्मः 
 
( वाक्यप . ब्रह्म . 24,25,26 )

पदार्थाष्टकविचारपरत्वात् वाक्यपदीयस्य -- हेलाराजः ( beginning of पदकाण्ड )

Eight स्फोटs are accepted -- 

वर्णस्फोटः , पदस्फोटः , वाक्यस्फोटाः , अखण्डपदस्फोटः , अखण्डवाक्यस्फोटः , वर्णजातिस्फोटः , पदजातिस्फोटः , वाक्यजातिस्फोटः 

स्फोटः means वाचकः । In वर्णस्फोट - ’ वर्ण’ means प्रकृति / प्रत्यय ।

Among them अखण्डवाक्यस्फोट is the सिद्धान्त । Others are taken up just for व्याकरणप्रक्रिया --

उपायाः शिक्षमाणानां बालानाम् अपललनाः । 
असत्ये वर्त्मनि स्थित्वा ततःसत्यं समीहते ॥ वा प  2-238

This व्याकरणम् is an असत्यमार्ग and meant to cheat the students - but is useful to reach the सत्यपदार्थ - ब्रह्मन् ( मोक्षः) ।

निरुक्तम् quotes two आचार्यs , viz वार्ताक्ष and औदुम्बरायण  , who argued that there is no four - fold division - नामाख्यातोपसर्गनिपाताः -- they are just artificial --

वाक्यस्य बुद्धौ नित्यत्वम् अर्थयोगं च लौकिकम् ।
दृष्ट्वा चतुष्ट्वं नास्तीति वार्ताक्षौदुंबरायणौ ॥ वा प 2-342

This is acceptable to भर्तृहरि ।

Then why शास्त्रम् ?

व्याप्तिमांश्च लघुश्चैव व्यवहारः पदाश्रयः ।
लोके शास्त्रे च कार्यार्थं विभागेनैव कल्पितः ॥ ibid 343

Applicable in many cases and full of brevity - the artificial separation into प्रकृति and प्रत्यय is created for use in शास्त्र and लोक ।

In all शास्त्रs the प्रक्रिया is a myth (मिथ्या) - but finally there will be विद्या --

शास्त्रेषु प्रक्रियाभेदैः अविद्यैवोपवर्ण्यते ।
अनागमविकल्पा तु स्वयं विद्योपवर्तते ॥ ibid 233

The अर्थ of वर्णs - धातु / कृत् / तद्धित  is just for शास्त्रम् and not लौकिक --

शास्त्रार्थ एव वर्णानाम् अर्थवत्त्वे प्रदर्शितः ।
धात्वादीनां विशुद्धानां लौकिको’र्थो न विद्यते ॥

कृत्तद्धितानामर्थश्च केवलानामलौकिकः ।
प्राग्विभक्तेः तदन्तस्य तथैवार्थो न विद्यते ॥ ibid 210, 211 

Different scholars exhibited different etymology for the same word --

कैश्चित् निर्वचनं भिन्नं गिरतेः गर्जतेः गमेः ।
गवतेः गदतेर्वपि गौरित्यत्रानुदर्शितम् ॥  ibid 174

गौः --  गॄ = निगरणे , गर्ज =शब्दे , गम्ल् = गतौ , गुङ् =अव्यक्ते शब्दे , गद = व्यक्तायां वाचि 

Ancient scholars like औक्थिक्य opined - since it is गोशब्द , by its form itself it renders the meaning - गौः । It is unnecessary to go for व्युत्पत्ति of the word -- but others said we want both - व्युत्पत्तिपक्ष and अव्युत्पत्तिपक्ष --

गौरित्येव स्वरूपाद्वा गोशब्दो गोषु वर्तते ।
व्युत्पाद्यते न वा सर्वं कैश्चिच्चोभयमिष्यते ॥ ibid 175

According to स्फोटवाद - there are neither words in a sentence nor syllables in a word - just कल्पना ---

पदे न वर्णा विद्यन्ते वर्णेष्ववयवा नच ।
वाक्यात् पदानाम् अत्यन्तं प्रविवेको न कश्चन ॥ वा प 1-73 

नच = इव ; प्रविवेकः = भेदः ( विचिर् प्रुथग्भावे , घञ् )

Same is the case with ' गुरु ’ ।

Under हयवरट् , Patanjali discusses the issue of meaning of syllables  - they are not meaningful.

वाक्यकाण्ड of वाक्यपदीयम् gives a good panorama .

धन्यो’स्मि







Dr.Korada Subrahmanyam
Professor of Sanskrit, CALTS,
University of Hyderabad,
Ph:09866110741(M),91-40-23010741(R),040-23133660(O)
Skype Id: Subrahmanyam Korada

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Narayan Joshi

unread,
Mar 6, 2017, 8:48:56 PM3/6/17
to bvparishat, gira...@juno.com, Narayan Joshi

Dear Prof Korada, Saadar PraNaam

 Thanks for explaining meaning of the word GURU.  You have added: one can take a device for some purpose and leave it behind after the purpose is served. There is no norm that a device should be like this and this. 

I would like to add some interesting examples of such devices:

In Nirukta contention is raised against the method of etymologizing as adopted by the reputed grammarian Śākaţāyana. He split up a single word into its constituent syllables (akşara) and derived each of them from different roots. This, the opponents argue, is fantastic and proceeding too far. In justifying Śākaţāyana’s principle Durga cites a Brāhmaņa passage, in which a word is derived from more than one root and as such lends support to the procedure followed by Śākaţāyana. For example in Śatapatha Brāhmaņa (XIV.7.4.1) the trisyllabic word hŗdaya is derived from three different roots—viz. hŗ from the root hŗ, da from the root and ya from the root i. So Śākaţāyana cannot be blamed when he is following the Brāhmaņas that constitute the greatest authority in such matters.

The term nighantu has been derived by Yāska in as many different ways—viz. from the ni+root han, ni+root gam, ni + root hr etc.. The logic behind using multiple roots is these roots can be shown to have some or other affinity with the resultant vocable.

Respected Vidvān V.Subrahmanian requested scholars of BVP to throw more light on this niyama or absence of niyama.  I say now there is no niyama in etymological explanations of Sanskrit words. Use any device-prakriti, pratyaya,   syllable, root, or even single phoneme (Varņa).

I used Var ņas from Varņamālā (periodic table of articulated letter sounds) not for as any device as described above but because there is an order inVarņamālā. The advantage of using Varnamālā is the order in semantic elements attached to Varņas with no randomness. They change gradually along with physical properties of letter-sounds. As I stated before there is no Sphota doctrine in Nirukta of Yāska. Many ancient āchāryas supported Varņavāda. I feel now vindicated in using Varņavāda to fetch out internal beauty of Sanskrit words. BVP scholars feel free to raise objections to my posting because I believe Vāde vāde jāyate tattvabodhah!.  N. R. Joshi

 

 

Etymology of GURU(3-6-17).pdf

sunil bhattacharjya

unread,
Mar 7, 2017, 5:29:03 PM3/7/17
to BHARATIYA VIDVAT
Namaste Sastryji,

The word"Guru" is very ancient, and one of the 108 upanishads explained its meaning as the one who removes darkness. I do not remember the verse at this time.  Such being the antiquity of the word, should we look into the later texts to contest that meaning of the word?

Regards,
Sunil KB


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages