सर्वेषु विद्वद्वरॆण्यॆषु विज्ञप्तिः-’गजकपित्थभक्षणन्यायः’अस्य विवरणं कृपया कुर्वन्तु।
इतिविद्वज्जनविधेयः
Mahesh kakathkar--
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
to subscribe go to the link below and put a request
https://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat/subscribe
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
|
Bengali |
কয়েতবেল Kayetabela, কপিত্থ Kapittha |
| English | Elephant apple, Wood apple, Indian Wood Apple, Curd fruit, Monkey fruit |
| Gujarati | કોઠી Kothi, કોઠા Kotha |
| Hindi | कठबेल Katabel, दधिफल Dadhiphal, कावित Kavit, दन्तसठ Dantasath, मन्मथ Manamath, पुष्पफल Pushpaphal, कपित्थ Kapitth, कैथ Or कैथा Kaith |
| Kannada | ದಧಿಫಲ Dadhiphala, ಮನಮಥ ಮರ Manmatha Mara, ಕಪಿಠಾ Kapithha, ಬೇಲದ ಮರ Baelada Mara, ಬೇಲದ ಹಣ್ಣಿನ ಮರ Baelada Hannina Mara, ದಮ್ತಸಟ Damtasata, ನಾಯಿಬೆಲ Nayibel |
| Malayalam | നായ് വേലം Naay Veelam, Vilavu, Vilarmaram, വിളങ്കായ് Vilankaay, Vilankai |
| Marathi | कवंठी Kavanti, कवंठ Kavant, कवठ Kavat, कपित्थ Kapith |
| Oriya | Koyito |
| Others | Monkey Fruit, Curd Fruit, Nal Vela, कइत्थं Kaittham, Wood Apple, कइत्थो Kaittho, Elephant Apple |
| Sanskrit | दन्तशठ Danthashatha, दधिफल Dadhiphala, पुष्पफल Pushpaphala, कपित्थं Kapithama, कपित्यं Kapityama, कपित्य Kapitya, दधित्थ Dadhittha |
| Tamil | விளா மரம் Vilamaram, விளாம்பழம் Vilampazam, கவித்தம் Kavittam, கபித்தம் Kapittam, விளா Vila, Vila, தந்தசடம் Tantacatam |
| Telugu | వెలగ Velaga, వెలగపండు Velagapandu, కపిత్థము Kapitthhamu |
From: V Subrahmanian <v.subra...@gmail.com>
To: mahesh.k...@gmail.com
Cc: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} गजकपित्थभक्षणन्यायः
सारभूतं गृहीत्वा निस्सारं त्याज्यमित्यर्थ:
From: Ganesh R <avadhan...@gmail.com>
To: ymoh...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} गजकपित्थभक्षणन्यायः
Gaja also means a kind of small insect that enters in to the fruit kapittha by making way near the tip of it (This phenomenon is seen in fruits like mango too where such insects enter in to their bony seed, known as asthi in Sanskrit). Later the insect gaja, having abundant food in the form of flesh of the said fruit, gets multiplied too. Thus at last the whole fruit, while keeping its shell intact gets corroded completely. Many people mistaking the insect gaja for elephant have loomed this myth of this mighty animal's mythical capability.:-)
From: subrahmanyam korada <kora...@gmail.com>
To: v.subra...@gmail.com
Cc: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} गजकपित्थभक्षणन्यायः
नमो विद्वद्भ्यःकपित्थम् (कवित्थम्/ दधित्थः/ग्राही/मन्मथः/दधिफलः/पुष्पफलः/दन्तशठः)कपित्थस्य फलम् कपित्थः (फले लुक् , पा 4-3-163 - विकारावयवप्रत्ययस्य मयटो लोपः)अभुक्त्वामलकं पथ्यं भुक्त्वा तु बदरीफलम्।कपित्थं सर्वदा पथ्यम् कदळी न कदाचन ॥ (आयुर्वेदः)आमकपित्थम् अकण्ठ्यानाम् (चरकसूत्रम्) - a raw kapittha spoils the स्वरपेटिका - will cause laryngitis .आजगाम यदा लक्ष्मीः नारिकेळफलांबुवत् ।निर्जगाम यदा लक्ष्मी गजभुक्तकपित्थवत् ॥ (पञ्चतन्त्रम्)Here कपित्थ means कपित्थफलसार (लक्षणा)This fruit is not good for teeth - दन्तशठः ( द्न्तानां शठः)
धन्यो’स्मि
The statement "this fruit is not good for the TEETH" is partly acceptable.
1. This statement has validity only when it is half ripen or unripen. If it is sufficiently ripen this fruit is good for health and doesn't cause any harm to the teeth.
2. Even for those who have a family history of "Stones in Kidneys" is also it doesn't have any adverse effect provided it is eaten in its season and in a well ripen state.
The same is the case with Tomatos and Lemons also. The unripen lemon causes caugh and well ripen lemon is a good medicine for caugh.
As a qualified Ayurvedic Doctor and as a person hailed from a family known for Ayurvedic Practitioners and Pharmacists for the last 6 generations I attest the fact that Kapittha doesn't harm to our teeth provided it is well ripen and eaten in its season.
Regarding the Elaboration for the sloka |
|
आजगाम यदा लक्ष्मीः नारिकेळफलांबुवत् ।
निर्जगाम यदा लक्ष्मी गजभुक्तकपित्थवत् ॥ (पञ्चतन्त्रम्)
|
the attachment of the posting of scholar Shri Sankara on this topic
has a very interesting and supplementing information.
Warm regards, Dr. Rani Sadasiva Murty --- On Sat, 30/3/13, Dr. Yadu Moharir <ymoh...@yahoo.com> wrote: |
|
Regarding the Elaboration for the slokaआजगाम यदा लक्ष्मीः नारिकेळफलांबुवत् ।निर्जगाम यदा लक्ष्मी गजभुक्तकपित्थवत् ॥ (पञ्चतन्त्रम्)the attachment of the posting of scholar Shri Sankara on this topichas a very interesting and supplementing information.
From: sadasivamurty rani <ranisada...@yahoo.com>
To: "kora...@gmail.com" <kora...@gmail.com>; "v.subra...@gmail.com" <v.subra...@gmail.com>; ymoh...@yahoo.com
Cc: "bvpar...@googlegroups.com" <bvpar...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:12 PM
| Dear Dr. Yadu Mharir ji! I thought that even if it is said briefly it could be understood by scholarly scientists like you. I couldn't expect that I need to take lot of exercise even to convince people like you. Any how as I am busy with writing some urgent articles and a book I could not find much time at my disposal to explain you all the things. "Most Ayurvedic practitioner's hang their hat on the conventional "Peg" of tradition rather than accepting the the facts of chemical entities present in the ingredients." Just this statement is offending and a bit inconvenient to see from a senior member like you. I can write volumes on the difference between the chemical properties of a same thing at two different times. 1. If we take curd its properties are different. When it is churned with a churning instrument its properties are different and when it is just diluted by adding water and shaking in a tin without churning it with churning stick its properties are different. 2. The same curd if taken in its first hours its effects are different, if taken after 6 hours the effect is different and after 24 hours if taken the effects are different. (There are five types of curds spoken of in the Ayurvedic texts and also with their different effects). 3. Mine is not merely theoretical knowledge. I have more than 30 years practical experience also. I can cause cough for a person by giving some ingredients and with the same ingredients stored for many weeks I can cure the same cough with in hours. 4. While telling that Ayurveda is in our family through generations I didn't mean that those secrets are with us only. For your kindest information My grand father who lived for 105 years was the founder principal of the Vijayawada Government Ayurvedic College for 35 years. My father also was a faculty member there. That college produced and has been producing some thousands of Ayurvedic Practitioners through several decades since 1926. My Great grand father was an author of more than 100 books on Ayurveda and my Grand father wrote nearly 250 Treatises on Ayurveda. Some of them were translations of rare texts on Rasa Tantra Treatises. 5. I am proud of saying that our family rendered lot of service for the spread of Ayurveda in Andhra pradesh. We have our own pharmacy too which served our region on non profitable and non commercial lines for 7 decades where we played with different chemicals since our child hood. 6. According to Ayurveda Every Dravya has GUNA, VIRYA, VIPAKA and PRABHAVA. All these four Guna, Virya, Vipaka and Prabhava are not the same in all the states of a Dravya. They vary from time to time. The modern chemistry, I am sure, cannot give reason for every such effect. 7. Take equal amounts of honey and ghee. mix honey thoroughly pouring it in ghee. That solution gives one effect. Again Take take equal amounts of honey and ghee (in same units) and mix ghee thoroughly pouring it in honey. That solution gives another and opposite effect. Chemistry is surely dumb in giving the reason for this. But Ayurveda has wonderful explanation for this. 8. Take equal amounts of water and sulphuric acid. Pour the acid in water and see the effect. Pour the water in the acid and see the difference. It is stunning to see that your posting shows lot of respect for the traditions and not even an iota of it to the practitioners? What a wonder? I am sorry for not finding enough time to extend this letter more than this. With warm regards, Dr. Rani Sadasiva Murty |
hariH OM,I apologize to you in particular and to the group in general for having overshot the scope of a reply to your mail, but your insensitivity towards a proven system had to be addressed.
Dr. Moharir,
"Properties of Chemicals (गुणधर्म) does not change. Thus the property of Oxalic Acid is not going to change whether the fruit is ripe or not. Actual amount may vary but not that significantly. Most Ayurvedic practitioner's hang their hat on the conventional "Peg" of tradition rather than accepting the the facts of chemical entities present in the ingredients."
The above stems from a bad mixing up of two epistemologies: that of chemistry / pharmaceutical science and that of shAstra. Your view goes against shAstra. In case you meant something else by guNa dharma, we wish to know the same. Water has the same chemical composition anywhere, but shAstra differentiates between cold water and hot water and their effects. When one says "shAstra", it means a long history of trial-error / empiricism / common sense etc. No person who is in his sane senses will ever drink cold water from a fridge when he has a cold and much less, justify it saying that the chemical composition is the same. Leave alone the difference between cold and hot water, water from different sources have different effects.
If one were to go by the chemistry / allopathic / pharmaceutical ayatollahs (CAPAs), no one should ever in his dreams think of taking mercury based medicines. But the mercury based medicines (e.g. sUtashekhara rasa) cure people of conditions which have no "cure" as per the CAPAs. If you bring up the question of evidence (as all such pharmaceutical ayatollahs do), the evidence in favour of Ayurveda cannot simply be wished away. This had been the primary bedrock of health management in our country since ages, whereas allopathic medicine's evidence base is so tottering that they need to recall approved drugs every now and then because of their long term adverse effects. Allopathic medicine seems to be scouring the surface of "what constitutes evidence" only lately. This is after the great hurry to force upon us certain kinds of evidence (the prohibitively costly triple blind randomised control trials or RCTs where those who get placebos are cheated by those whom they trust to cure them!!!). The above has been revealed by Sir Michael Rawlins in his Harveian Oration of 2008. You may find the same here:
http://bookshop.rcplondon.ac.uk/contents/pub262-9bc950aa-00e6-4266-8e80-e4bc63a25262.pdf
Of particular interest in the above oration: a randomized control trial (RCT) having cost a pharma company 189 million pounds. Just a back of envelope calculation will suggest that it is about:
13,797,000,000 = 13 billion or 1300 crore Rupees. If that be the cost of a trial, what will be the cost of the drug? If one were to go by your line of thought, Ayurvedic drugs which have been curing people since ages will cost 1000 times higher than what they do now.
Secondly in the same oration: Certain governments demanded that there be a placebo controlled trial of Ganciclovir. This was an anti-retroviral drug which was known to be effective. Some HIV patients are prone to a condition where they may lose their eyesight if not treated with this drug. There were certain Pharmaceutical Ayatollahs who forced the governments to do an RCT.
The result was that those who got the placebo went blind. The intervention was proven effective at the cost of people going blind. Secondly, those people who were not in the trial group went blind too (because the governments had taken a decision to discontinue the drug until the results came)!!! One shudders at the thought as to what would happen if some CAPAs were to convince the government to discontinue / ban the use of Ayurveda until each and every formulation in the Ayurvedic granthas were proven.
In sum, please don't expect Ayurveda to answer the questions which are loaded / have been wrongly formulated.svasti,JAYA BHAVAANII BHAARATII,shrivathsa.
To: Shrivathsa B <shrivath...@gmail.com>
Cc: sadasivamurty rani <ranisada...@yahoo.com>; "v.subra...@gmail.com" <v.subra...@gmail.com>; Dr. Yadu Moharir <ymoh...@yahoo.com>; "bvpar...@googlegroups.com" <bvpar...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} गजकपित्थभक्षणन्यायः
नमो विद्वद्भ्यः