Group: http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat/topics
- Sanskrit word for civet [6 Updates]
- Janamejaya and sudhanva inscriptions [1 Update]
- छन्दःशास्त्रम् - लघुत्वम् - "प्रह्रे वा" [1 Update]
VKG <vkghan...@gmail.com> Oct 26 06:04PM -0700
How about the word Kasturi? This is traditionally used.
"Hnbhat B.R." <hnbh...@gmail.com> Oct 27 08:57AM +0530
कस्तूरिकाजननभृता मृगेण किं सेव्यते सुमनसां मनसापि गन्धः।
Here is the word कस्तूरीमृगः ---
कस्तूरी-मृग
(H3) कस्तूरी--मृग [L=46893] m. the musk-deer Comm. on Kum. i , 55.
Are both the same?
The reference to the deer in the commentary on Kumarasambhava:
m.rganaabhigandhi - the commentary of Vallabhadeva =
m.rgaa.naam+kastuurikaa*kura"ngaa.naam*
Is the कस्तूरीमृग known as कुरङ्ग - deer or cat? called civet cat? Or are
there two animals cat and deer that produce musk = कस्तूरी. Or the same,
called as cat in English, and Deer in Sanskrit? This seems the base of the
query though it is not mentioned explicitly.
This is what the English word means as per English Dictionary:
Cat-like mammal typically secreting musk used in perfumes
civet cat
Here is the Oxford Dictionary Entry for the English word civet:
civet
Pronunciation: /ˈsɪvɪt/
noun
(also civet cat)
*1a slender nocturnal carnivorous mammal with a barred and spotted coat and
well-developed anal scent glands, native to Africa and Asia.*
Family Viverridae (the civet family): several genera and species. The civet
family also includes the genets, linsang, and fossa, and formerly included
the mongooses.
[mass noun] *a strong musky perfume obtained from the secretions of the
civet’s scent glands.*
2US the ring-tailed cat or cacomistle.
Origin:
mid 16th century: from French civette, from Italian zibetto, from medieval
Latin zibethum, from Arabic zabād, denoting the perfume
I think now it throws some light.
Now, according English dictionaries, civet is native of Africa and Asia.
Now the question is the same sharpened: \
Is it civet and कस्तूरी-मृग are both the same or two different animals and
if different, both produce the scent or any confusion there?
sadasivamurty rani <ranisada...@yahoo.com> Oct 27 11:47AM +0800
Musk is Kasturi. Kasturi Mrga is Musk deer. I have mentioned in my previous reply that the word "Gandha Mrga" is used in two meanings: 1. Civet and 2. Musk deer.
Dr. Rani Sadasiva Murty
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 6:34 AM, VKG <vkghan...@gmail.com> wrote:
How about the word Kasturi? This is traditionally used.
--
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
V Subrahmanian <v.subra...@gmail.com> Oct 27 10:15PM +0530
One can see a picture of a civet and read related information here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civet
subrahmanian.v
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:17 AM, sadasivamurty rani <
Ajit Gargeshwari <ajit.gar...@gmail.com> Oct 27 10:28PM +0530
Civet is not Musk deer anyway. According to wiki Civets have a broadly
cat-like general appearance, though the muzzle is extended and often
pointed, rather like that of an otter or a mongoose.
Small Indian civets are known to occur in so one can probably get a
sanskrit equvalent for Small Indian civet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Indian_Civet
Sorry to quote wiki. I thought this might be useful.
Regards
Ajit Gargeshwari
न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचिन्नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूयः।
अजो नित्यः शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे।।2.20।।
sadasivamurty rani <ranisada...@yahoo.com> Oct 28 03:06AM +0800
Yes. Exactly the same kind of civets are there on the Tirumala Balaji hills the liquid that flows from these civets used in Upacaras for Sri Balaji.
Dr. Rani Sadasiva Murty
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 10:29 PM, Ajit Gargeshwari <ajit.gar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Civet is not Musk deer anyway. According to wiki Civets have a broadly cat-like general appearance, though the muzzle is extended and often pointed, rather like that of an otter or a mongoose. Small Indian civets are known to occur in so one can probably get a sanskrit equvalent for Small Indian civet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Indian_Civet
Sorry to quote wiki. I thought this might be useful.
Regards
Ajit Gargeshwari
न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचिन्नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूयः।
अजो नित्यः शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे।।2.20।।
--
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Veeranarayana Pandurangi <veer...@gmail.com> Oct 27 06:14PM +0530
dear all
1. there is a mention of Janamejaya inscriptions in the "age of mahabharata
war" by Kota Venkatachelam.
in this link
http://trueindianhistory-kvchelam.blogspot.in/2009/08/gift-deed-of-janamejaya-early.html
an image of printed version of Janamejaya's inscription is exhibited. it is
said as "An inscription (plate) of a gift deed by Emperor Janemejaya.
(Indian Antiquary P. P. 333-334) runs thus:-" [image of inscription]
it is also found in this link.
http://ancientindians.wordpress.com/geography/archaeological-connections/king-janamejayas-dana-sasana-patram-letter-of-gift/
But we have to verify in which volume of Indian Antiquary it appears.
here is the link for index for indian antiquary. but somehow it is not
opening for me.
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=9yHkAAAAMAAJ&source=gbs_similarbooks
2. one insription of sudhanva is said to be found in Dvaraka Shankara math
is mentioned in the below link
http://mahabharathascience.blogspot.in/p/material-evidence-supporting-time-of.html
"the copper plate inscription of Emperor Sudhanva who ruled over Gujarat.
It was a memorandum presented by Emperor Sudhanva to Sri Sankara was
inscribed on copper-plate dated the year 2663 on the Yudhishtira Saka. The
copper plate inscription of Emperor Sudhanva proves that the year of the
demise of Sri Sankara is 2663 of the Yudhishtira Era or B.C. 477-76. The
beginning of Yudhishtira Era is the time of the Mahabharata war. It had
already proved to be B.C. 3138. So Sri Sankara’s life works out to be B.C.
509 to B.C.477-476, Yudhishtira Era 2662+476=3138 B.C."
full version of this inscription is found in the below link
http://www.sanskrit.nic.in/SVimarsha/sv.htm
needs to be verified.
below link quotes it to be available in Dvaraka peeth.
http://vanitha.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/home.do?thisPage=%2Fep%2Ftheweek%2Fcontent%2FprintArticle.jsp%3FBV_ID%3D%2540%2540%2540%26com.broadvision.session.new%3DYes%26articleTitle%3DFirst%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bmutts%26language%3Denglish%26contentOID%3D10650715
"Mahamahopadhyay J.N. Dwivedi, director of Dwarakadheesh Sanskrit Academy
and Indology Research Institute, tells us that the current Shankaracharya
of Dwaraka is 78th since the time of Adi Shankara. “There has not been a
single day when Dwaraka Peetha did not have a Shankaracharya,” he says.
“There is an interesting copper plate inscription at the peetha which was
issued by King Sudhanva in 477 BC.” (The peetha puts Adi Shankara’s birth
at around 507 BC.) There are no other records available."
please help me to get it verified.
Veeranarayana N.K. Pandurangi
Head, Dept of Darshanas,
Yoganandacharya Bhavan,
Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Rajasthan Samskrita University, Madau, post
Bhankrota, Jaipur, 302026. India
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि। ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा
पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः। निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व
विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
http://jrrsanskrituniversity.ac.in/ <jrrsanskri...@ac.in>
http://jrrsanskrituniversity.ac.in/acd1.asp <jrrsanskri...@ac.in>
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!forum/bvparishat
Nityanand Misra <nmi...@gmail.com> Oct 27 03:10AM -0700
--
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 1:03:25 AM UTC+8, विश्वासो वासुकेयः wrote:
>> प्रद्योतस्य प्रियदुहितरं वत्सराजोऽत्र जह्रे ।
>> Here, the ह्र in जह्रे is not at the beginning of a word. Therefore the
>> guru is mandatory.
A counter-example (such usage in the middle of the pada) is seen in verse
813 of the Nārāyaṇīyam.
राज्ञां मध्ये सपदि जह्रिषे मित्रविन्दामवन्तीम्
where ज is to be treated as लघु. Some online versions have the reading
जहृषे which is incorrect. हृञ् हरणे - आत्मनेपदे - लिटि -
जह्रे, जह्राते, जह्रिरे. जह्रिषे, जह्राथे, जह्रिध्वे. जह्रे, जह्रिवहे,
जह्रिमहे. The edition by T Ganapati Sastri has the right reading (attached).
Also see the footnotes in the attached commentary on the Sutra गन्ते
(पि.सू. १/१०) of Chandah Shastra edition of NSP (Kavyamala Series 91).
Especially note the citations -
वर्णो गुरुर्मतो ह्रेप्रे पादान्ते चापि वा लघुः (छन्दःकौस्तुभे)
यदा तीव्रप्रयत्नेन संयोगादेरगौरवम्
न च्छन्दोभङ्गमप्याहुस्तदा दोषाय सूरयः (छन्दःप्रकाशे)
यदि हि युक्तपरः श्रममन्तरा लघुरपि प्रभवेच्चरणान्तरा (?)
अणु वदन्ति न वृत्तविदूषणं तमथ भूषणमेव मनीषिणः (वृत्तप्रत्ययकौमुद्याम्)
Needless to say, these are not universally agreed upon. The purists' view
is to treat all संयोगपर as गुरु, as Shatavadhani Ganesh Ji does. The other
view is that they can be optionally लघु if the effort in pronunciation of
the conjunct is quick (तीव्रप्रयत्नेन) or with less effort (श्रममन्तरा).
Examples of both views are seen in middle-age and modern Samskrita poetry.
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.