How old is Sanskrit - beyond India - Dr.Kurt Schildmanns logographic Sanskrit Decipherment

[Dr.BVK Sastry (Gmail)]

Namaste

 

May I seek the opinion –review of traditional scholars on the resource provided at the url below , on the topic of paleo Sanskrit ? Will this push history of Sanskrit to 12000 years BCE ?

 

http://www.human-resonance.org/Sanskrit.pdf  ( a document of about 200 plus pages with many illustrations and glyph readings  which may be relevant to Sanskrit teams  and history)

 

These are  Dr.Kurt Schildmann's logographic Sanskrit Decipherment (Year  1999) in relation to  Southern Illinois Caves - Indigenous Native American Tribes and Sanskrit ? connection ?

 

Points of interest : (Page 128) –Kundalini  

 

Evidence can not be questioned as it is a fact. Interpretations can vary in as many ways as scholars see and think.

 

Regards

BVK Sastry

 

[sunil bhattacharjya]

Namaste,

Brahmi is said to have the face looking like that of a snake. In case Brahmi is considered to be the presiding deity of the Brahmi script, could the engravings on the stones be referring to ancient Brahmi symbols ?

Regards,

Sunil K.B

--
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bvpar...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Ashok Aklujkar]

One thing to remember in this context is that we do not still know what the ancient Brahmi really looked like. The name Brahmi given to the script found in "A;sokan" inscriptions and the inscriptions on some SriLankan potsherds etc. (claimed by some to be more ancient than  "A;sokan" inscriptions) is a case of good guessing. We still have not found (a) a specimen where that sort of script is found with the specification Brahmi attached to it or (b) a description of Brahmi characters which matches with the writing instances now claimed to be Brahmi. In other words, a confirmation that we are justified in attaching the detail "Brahmi" to what we now regard as instances of Brahmi writing is still wanted. See Richard Salomon,  Indian Epigraphy, pp. 8-10 and 17-19.

a.a.

[Vinay Jha]

Namaste,

I read this 93 MB document and was astonished at the similarities among hieroglyphs and logographic symbols from distant cultures in America and Mediterranean. There must be some linguistic similarity too. Such phenomena were noticed earlier too, but mainstream "scholars" always suppress such discoveries.

VJ