Fwd: [INDOLOGY] paratva again

288 views
Skip to first unread message

Vineet Chaitanya

unread,
Dec 20, 2022, 9:51:40 AM12/20/22
to BHARATIYA VIDVAT


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Amba Kulkarni <ambap...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 7:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: [INDOLOGY] paratva again
To: Vineet Chaitanya <vc99...@gmail.com>



FYI

Amba
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John Lowe <john...@ames.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 6:21 PM
Subject: [INDOLOGY] paratva again
To: Indology List <indo...@list.indology.info>


Dear all,

what has surprised and worried me most in all this is the way that an unsubstantiated claim has been propagated as truth by Cambridge University, and by many otherwise reputable newspapers and broadcasters around the world including, in the UK, the BBC and the Independent newspaper, without any of them bothering to seek independent confirmation. 

I would like to note the honourable exception of the NY Times, who I spoke to on Friday after they sought a third-party view. After I explained that this is not 'Cambridge student solves 2,500 year old mystery', but rather merely 'Cambridge student proposes new idea, academic community yet to assess it', they quite rightly decided that it was not newsworthy. What I think would be much more newsworthy is quite how this Trump-esque propagation of what is really - at least at this point in time, that is, until or unless the claims are proved true and accepted in the academic community - fake news, happened.

It is of course good to see Sanskrit in the mainstream news, but at the expense of truth and academic integrity? I am not so sure.

Rishi, I like you and have supported you in the past, but since you have been bold enough to declare yourself the saviour of Pāṇinian studies, perhaps you will permit me a few critical comments/questions. The 'philological' argument you made in an earlier post does not actively support your argument. At best it shows that yes, para in the sense 'subsequent, to the right' can apply to contexts for rules. But that doesn't mean that 'subsequent' can't also apply in the context of the order of rules themselves, that is, it doesn't rule out the interpretation you are arguing against. What would be more probative would be to show that Pāṇini himself uses a different term for that, so that para cannot have the meaning usually assumed.

Then you note that most readers of this list wouldn't follow the detailed technical arguments. True perhaps, but what any academic could follow, what I would like in this context, and what is missing from your thesis, is any attempt at a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the relative coverage of your proposal vs the existing proposals. Let us say, for example, that the traditional Pāṇinīya model of rule interaction recognizes, or at least discusses, 30 exceptions or classes of exceptions, and the Kiparsky siddha model say 20. How many of these does your proposal immediately account for, without any other mechanisms required? To what extent can all the cases immediately accounted for on the previous models also be immediately accounted for on your model? What remains unassessed? What kinds of problematic cases are there, and what kinds of solutions are you forced into? How do the numbers and types of exceptions compare with those of previous approaches, and can this tell us anything about the relative value of the different approaches? This is not religion or poetry: it is, or at least aims to be, science - so there must be some objective verification available.

Your thesis admits that you have not considered the accent rules nor the Vedic rules, so at best you can only claim that your proposal works for a specific subset of the sutras. I also note that there are examples discussed in your thesis which don't immediately fall out from your proposal, and you admit the likelihood of more; and for these you propose 'solutions' like: excluding derivations involving uṇādi suffixes as being non-Pāṇinian (p. 230); proposing that rules which contradict your idea might be later additions to the Aṣṭādhyāyī (p. 212); taking forms which are standardly treated as two-step derivations as one-step derivations based on a previously fully constituted form (p. 231). To what extent are these 'solutions' better or worse, or narrower or broader in scope, than what is needed under earlier proposals?

Perhaps these solutions are valid in the particular cases you discuss, or perhaps not, but the point is: only if you, or someone else - but really it should be you first off - can provide a clear assessment of the overall picture, showing that your proposal uncontroversially - that is, in an objectively verifiable way - improves the empirical adequacy of the Aṣṭādhyāyī as a grammar of Pāṇinian Sanskrit in comparison with earlier interpretations, can the field even begin to move towards the point of accepting this as a revolution in our understanding. Otherwise, it is just another idea out there - a new one, and an interesting one, yes, and one you can be proud of, but not necessarily any better or truer than existing ideas.

John







_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDO...@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

Nagaraj Paturi

unread,
Dec 20, 2022, 9:53:58 AM12/20/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Prof. Madhav Deshpande's response to this :

Dear John,

Thanks for a balanced commentary. I think there is too much of मया जितम्, rather than a calm presentation and evaluation of alternative proposals. The first historical question is to reccognize that it is Patañjali who extends the scope of 1.4.2 beyond the ekasaṃjñādhikāra [i.e. the scope defined by 1.4.1], and where this extension creates problems, Patañjali interprets the word para to mean iṣṭa "desired," allowing a so called pūrvavipratiṣedha. As a result, in Patañjali's proposal, the choice between paraṃ kāryaṃ and pūrvaṃ kāryam is determined simply by looking at what is iṣṭa "desirable" in a given derivation. OK. This is what Patañjali's extension of 1.4.2 has given us. Now Rishi accepts Patañjali's extension of 1.4.2 to the whole of the Aṣṭādhyāyī, but not his understanding that the rule refers to a resolution of rule conflict by referring to the order of the rules. Then he takes the word para to refer to the order of morphemes in the derivation [left versus right context], and not the order of rules in the Aṣṭādhyāyī. This makes the rule 1.4.2 rather irrelevant for the entire ekasaṃjñādhikāra, where the order of morphemes in the derivation is not an issue. One then has to find new innovative solutions for the choice of saṃjñā in this ekasaṃjñādhikāra, while the very placement of 1.4.2 coming after 1.4.1 becomes rather meaningless. To account for Rishi's new interpretation, certain inconvenient rules in the Aṣṭādhyāyī are then labeled as possible interpolations. At least Patañjali's extension of 1.4.2 to the whole of the Aṣṭādhyāyī does not leave the ekasaṃjñādhikāra high and dry. For these and many other cogent reasons pointed out by various scholars on this list, I remain unconvinced of these new proposals. 
     An alternative investigation may involve keeping the scope of 1.4.2 restricted to the ekasaṃjñādhikāra, as Pāṇini most likely intended, and see how one can account for the derivations for which Patañjali proposes to extend this rule to the rest of the Aṣṭādhyāyī. That would be my suggestion. Best regards,

Madhav

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAK5aoV%3DXBncnZPyGhpRi9umjm9ADd%2B%3DJcxFwVqFQUgDL5b_yjg%40mail.gmail.com.


--
Nagaraj Paturi
 
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.


Senior Director, IndicA
BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
BoS Kavikulaguru Kalidasa Sanskrit University, Ramtek, Maharashtra
BoS Veda Vijnana Gurukula, Bengaluru.
Member, Advisory Council, Veda Vijnana Shodha Samsthanam, Bengaluru
BoS Rashtram School of Public Leadership
Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Studies in Public Leadership
Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies, 
FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education, 
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
 
 
 

Raghavendra

unread,
Dec 20, 2022, 11:57:22 PM12/20/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Greetings of the day,

Precisely, these are the questions I have addressed to the respected Professor K Subramanyam ji, couple of days ago, with a request to throw light upon it.

Best regards,


--
Nagaraj Paturi
 
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.


Senior Director, IndicA
BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
BoS Kavikulaguru Kalidasa Sanskrit University, Ramtek, Maharashtra
BoS Veda Vijnana Gurukula, Bengaluru.
Member, Advisory Council, Veda Vijnana Shodha Samsthanam, Bengaluru
BoS Rashtram School of Public Leadership
Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Studies in Public Leadership
Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies, 
FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education, 
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
 
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

Rajaram Krishnamurthy

unread,
Dec 20, 2022, 11:57:23 PM12/20/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com, John Lowe
Pranaam
I am not a scholar either in Vedas or in the software /hardware; is there anyone who knew the whole vedas meaning upside down?; not in India even today; but the British wrote in majority, paying Kasi Pundits and learning  something in Sanskrit, calling the spade , not a spade, just because , they wanted , their religion to be on top, where THEY DID FAIL. The London university does not speak so highly of Maths wizard Ramanujam, as they do about his boss. So I am not surprised when John wrote something unworthy on an Indian Origin software effort as worthless!! John verbatim style made me remember the styles of Max Muller, Rig veda english scriber, and the German who wrote HINDU. When every scientist did something, the world hated it so , it is not a surprise that John wrote a baseless review, holding only one Media to his rescue, while he named all the rest as fools or living in that Paradise. Bu8t why does Parishat do it?; well frogs pulling their own legs , not to get out of the well?. I went through His PhD paper, through Mr Kalyana Raman and I saw a deep effort on his part which not only embraced the Panini , but also, highlighted to the earth, what is Sanskrit?. While USA is breaking its head to make it a potential language of curriculum and the machines, John likes , always thwarts ,  following its predecessors; but Parishat should not have said "balanced". Thank you. I wish Cambridge would like more Indians to shine against such oddities. Thank you all K Rajaram  {not a popular person or VIP) 

S. Kalyanaraman

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 1:05:41 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
I am very happy that our Samskrtam tradition has become the focus of attention thanks to a fake news announcing a new discovery or a new solution to a '2500 year old puzzle created by Pāṇini.'

I have reviewed the thread again and find that the most comprehensive commentary on the fake news is provided by John Lowe on Indology list. Thanks, John, for this.

To make the fake news more intelligible, I suggest that some examples of 'order of morphemes' should be offered by Dr. Rajpopat (in the forthcoming Central Sanskrit University debate) on how he solves an 'old Pāṇini puzzle,' by using 'left or right order' of morphemes in select Samskrtam expressions.

Namaskaram.



Nagaraj Paturi

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 1:22:05 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
" Fake news " is not a fair way of talking about this, Dr Kalyanaraman garu. 

We have to encourage our young scholar for his innovative work. 

If there is a 'hype'  getting circulated around that good work, we need to responsibly balance that hype with the true achievement of the young scholar. 

It is also true that Indolgists of all ideological positions have always been focusing on Sanskrit. There is nothing new about it. 

The impact that this sensationalism of the media news added now is the attention among non-professionals, non-academicians, the common public towards Sanskrit, Panini etc. 

As scholars , it is our responsibility to use this opportunity to highlight the true achievements of both the ancient and contemporary vaiyaakaraNas of India and place the achievement of our younger colleague in the right perspective. 

I know that this is the healthy objective behind Prof. Varakhedi's announcement of Vaakyaartha Sadas also. 

Subrahmanyam Korada

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 1:29:56 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
नमो विद्वद्भ्यः

Precisely, these are the questions I have addressed 
                                                                                      -- Vid Raghavendra

Dear विद्वन्  राघवेन्द्र

did you get answers to all your questions . Feel free to write if the answers or not at a satisfactory level or you have some more questions / doubts left behind .

धन्यो’स्मि


Dr.Korada Subrahmanyam
Adju.Professor , Dept of Heritage Science and Technology, IIT, Hyderabad
299 Doyen , Serilingampally, Hyderabad 500 019
Ph:09866110741
Skype Id: Subrahmanyam Korada


BVK Sastry (G-S-Pop)

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 2:44:36 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com, john...@ames.ox.ac.uk

Namaste  Rajaram Krishna Murthy

 

Asking a right question is nothing do with ‘seeking popularity – rating – brownies’ !

You have raised many points – of complex connectivity to respond, making point wise replay important.

Do you think you are asking the right question or expressing frustration ? That is all I am interested to know.

 

May be it is time your words should provoke scholars of tradition to pick ‘ right -weapons’ and ‘pens’ for strategic restoring ‘Bharath- Bhashaa – Atma nirbharaaa’.

Political Will is  a fall out of Personal Will- willingness and People-Togetherness in ACTION.    

 

1. Pl.  Help me to understand what you had in your mind in writing < but the British wrote in majority, paying Kasi Pundits and learning  something in Sanskrit, calling the spade , not a spade, just because , they wanted , their religion to be on top, where THEY DID FAIL.  > :

 

Colonial British did not fail. They succeeded in the goal that was set for them:  The Physical Divide of Mahabharath  also triggered DIVIDE   in  Narratives – Discourse- Research  related to ‘LANGUAGE- CULTURE-  HISTORY’.

Colonial goal was clearly articulated  and ‘then leaders of locale  helped the British to realize it  in exchange for a consideration’ !  This ‘ legacy history’.  The  Colonial goal:  Make India study ‘Veda/ Gita like Old Testament’ has been upheld and promoted.

The postcolonial research  has accepted this position of  Institutional authority from Cambridge like Institutions’. There is no more embarrassment in ‘speaking about ‘hanuman as monkey god/ Ganesha as elephant god’.  The sacred texts of Vedic Tradition, in Language: Samskrutham are  viewed in the preferred achromatized lens –  using interpretation to suit the needs of colonial machinery funding the research.

The ‘Latin, Greek, German, French, English – serve as European-Lens- Language Models for Panini Studies;  

The ‘Prakruth -Desi Language Families of Brahmi’ serve as Indian - I.E/ Oriental-Lens- Language Models for Panini Studies.

 

Where did the Native tradition of ‘ Samskrutham: Veda Bhashaa / Deva Bhashaa / Vedanga- Vak-yoga/ Vako-Vakya’  Yoga-Samskrutham tradition disappear ?? Why ? 

 

When ‘Panini-Language’ is NOT studied in its Native WAY – MODEL, How can one claim to have improvised on ‘ Panini’ ??   

 

For historic evidence, you can go through all major records, more pointedly the preamble to  Monier Williams dictionary ! project. If that does not suffice, the Samskruth text from Indian Pundits over coated with European language translations, to project ‘What is Vedic Heritage’ !  Well this will be total digression here. I wish someone else takes it up with you.   

Giving due respect to the work of Cambridge in promoting/ giving a  space to Sanskrit does not come as a freebie or appreciation of ‘Religions – Philosophies- History of Bharath that was Mahabharath and now India/ Hindustan’.

 

2.  Pl. Help me to understand the highlighted part of your statement : < I went through His PhD paper, through Mr Kalyana Raman and I saw a deep effort on his part which not only embraced the Panini , but also, highlighted to the earth, what is Sanskrit?. >   

What is the ‘deep effort’ directed for ??   What is this highlighted understanding as answer to the question ‘what is Sanskrit’ – emerging from the thesis , which you gleaned  ?

How is it comparable to ‘Panini’s understanding of Samskrutham aka Sanskrit’ ??

 

 

3.   The observation < is there anyone who knew the whole vedas meaning upside down?; not in India even today >  is irrelevant for this thread, in my opinion.   There is no need to invoke ‘Veda: Meaning’ when discussion is on  ‘ Vednaga: Vyakaranra – Specific Text –Teaching Positions, Traditions, more so in a narrowest window !

 

4. The  operative term in the debated rule is  ‘param - kaaryam’- the process guidance.   

                                               Vipratishedhe is a condition like’ When / If –Then’.

 

   What is the reference for ‘ Param’  inside of ‘Ashtadhyayi’ ?  

                     ‘para’ is a   ‘gana- pathita’ shabda and  occurs in several sutra’s with specificity.

 

People acquainted with Panini know very well how to construct the scope of ‘Vi-  the upasarga’ which changes the  flavours of meaning and application.

 

People acquainted with Panini know very well how to construct the scope of ‘Saptami vibhakti’ as conditionality (adhikarana) or in multiple senses, within the operating frame of Ashtadhyayi structure,  which itself is a Voice Primary Grammar- Cognitive Linguistic Processing- Programming rule book.

 

The total interest of Bharateeya paramparaa in ‘Shabdaartha – Taatparya Vi-Nirnaya’ for Moksha –Shaastra goal and Yoga- Abhyasa ( Gita : 6-44).

 

The Machine programmers know very well how the ‘jump to’ – operation is coded  in application execution.

The Machine programmers know very well that they are no-where closer to ‘Cognitive Linguistic Neural Network Processing and Programming Models of Language needed for A.I / robotics.

 

The total interest of Techno-Linguistic corporate driving Western Academia to study ‘Sanskrit’ is to digest –dilute –disconnect native people from native tradition, to accelerate ‘ journey towards pre-declared goals’.  Soft talk-terms of language do not provide a fig leaf cover to the deeper intent and level of on-going work.

 

The plurality of current interests driving the total combine of Corporate –backed Institutionalized Academia researching – investigating  ‘Sanskrit’ comes from multiple perspectives and expectations. The investment to investigate the target native tradition is best strategized by ‘Pay – Native – Pundits to bend back and work’ !   

 

5. When you highlight ‘John Verbatum style  as helping to remember…’,  did the thought of ‘Vyasa –Ganesha – Mahabharath scribing ( even if mythical story) cross your mind ? How Suta-Puranika / Kathakar traiditons spread language –content using ‘memory to  recall text –accurately’ ?

 

6. On  < While USA is breaking its head to make it a potential language of curriculum and the machines, John likes , always thwarts ,  following its predecessors; but Parishat should not have said "balanced". Thank you. I wish Cambridge would like more Indians to shine against such oddities.  > :

 

      BVP can respond to your observation on its own.

 

     For Me, pl. clarify :  What makes you think about US -corporate proactive investments to engage -support

      research exploration in ‘Panini Language – grammar’ for several decades, using multiple fronts ?? 

      More so with focused with fronts of Religion organizations and even more specific with ‘Technology Lead

       Institutions’ ?

        ‘Simple Directive: America First’.  Simple Goal: Complete the unfinished Agenda.

         ‘Working Model: Use ‘Control through Technology to accelerate the process  and Deliver.

 

         It is legitimate and must  in the interest of Business Models of American Corporate to explore new

          markets of Multilingual – Solutions; and Sanskrit with Devanagari script happens to be the

         one such part of global market ! Now it is expanded to  cover all scripts and voices of all languages  of

         Bharath ( in particular).

       For a reference ( which obviously falls out of BVP – frame), you may explore the reports and post actions.

 

       Data Literacy - KPMG Global (home.kpmg) ; Cyber Security - KPMG India (home.kpmg)

       

       Does it mean Nation – Language community scholars should fall prey to serve a remote agenda- cause ?

      

       Does it mean that natives of  nation must go ga–ga over ‘self- decimation and self- deprecation of

       Identity, and be a  pride –shell to guard ‘distorted tradition’   ?

 

       Ignorance is NO Excuse. Innocence demands Learning Effort. Indifference is Self- deception.

       Interpretation of Text for Self- justification of Inaction  is WORST Game –Play with no excuse!

 

Regards

BVK Sastry

S. Kalyanaraman

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 9:02:15 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
I am sorry. I entirely agree with you Nagaraj Paturi ji. 'Fake news' is a hyperbole. The news coverage is hyped up, but should certainly NOT belittle the achievement of the young Samskrtam scholar Dr. Rajpopat. After all, there are not many studying language formation and evolution and certainly not many studying Samskrtam grammar. Kudos to Dr. Rajpopat for specialising in this archaic domain of knowledge. We are mere sound-byte idlers, time-wasters filling the media space.

Nagaraj Paturi

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 9:16:13 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Namaskaaram , Dr Kalyanaran🙏

We are indebted to you for your contribution in the area of history and archeology 'Saraswati Civilization' , particularly the script decipherment .

Thanks for your encouragement to Dr Rajpopat. 

Media staff can not be expected to be knowledgeable in the nuances of the academic research news that they publish. Moreover, sensationalism sells. 

So your intention to point out the exaggeration in the news is not wrong. 

I was only saying that in  the process we should not discourage a good researcher who boldly comes up with an innovative finding. 

Namaskaaram.

Nagaraj

S. Kalyanaraman

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 10:27:05 AM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Rajaram Krishnamurthy

unread,
Dec 21, 2022, 10:46:32 PM12/21/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com, john...@ames.ox.ac.uk
Pranam
I went through the scholarly email; your yoga may be connected to B V Raman I do not know, and SR Rao I read a lot. However, there were controversial topics raised by you and Mr Lokanathan also. Karnataka is lucky to have you like people. However when there is an attitude of defeatism exposed in the acidic contentions, criticising the researchers , so young , without compromising,a famous university would not have, simply passed off a raw dust as paper. Similar minds like you , would have crossed through all the stuff you are against. Ji, samskritam was not lost exclusively to your ancestors' patronage or desertions but, all of us are the cause of negligence. What at this age you are doing, when your counts, were too little on this land of dharma (though a commercial viability can be there at Florida Lauderdale beach,and not encouraged in India then)  -few youngsters are trying their Gnana seeking the upturn of the ancient culture-which shall be definitely appreciated.  Lets not show our vindictiveness of finding loopholes. Cambridge had acknowledged it -right. There were some learned there also. Mr John might be a scholar.  Nr BVK Sastry, a yoga specialist. In spite of the specialists since then till date,  what all contributed in India was/is, not even looking at Tilak or Dayananda or Aurobindo and many Indian translations of the Rig Veda, but depended only on Griffith. Is that not a shame?.  So let's forget the past. As we call the efforts of kids to walk with great eulogism, so do we encourage every young man and woman, trying to bring back our pride; not to feel pride of the west who did only to find a cause , for their self-serving purposes. I still owe them for their acts of dust cleared. But their contributions in English, carried out with the blunders, is not to be appreciated at all. Their wrong paths allowed many Indians to earn money by using them in my opinion. My gratitude to them is not my patriotism to my ancestors sir. I find a lot going against a young man. Blunting the edge is unwanted. Let's grow. I thank these people who echo my sentiments and some of them are also the west:

1 Ayam bandhuhu ayam néti gńāna laghuchetsām

Udāracharitānām tu vasudhaiva kutumbakam

Mahopanishad VI.72

2 A (spiritually) less evolved person says ‘This is a friend. That one is not.’ To a broad minded (spiritually evolved) person the whole world is a family. “It is already becoming clear that a chapter that has a Western beginning will have to have an Indian ending if it is not to end in the self-destruction of the human race...At this supremely dangerous moment in human history, the only way of salvation is the ancient Hindu way. Here we have the attitude and spirit that can make it possible for the human race to grow together into a single family.” Arnold Joseph Toynbee (1889-1975)

3  Knowledge of one’s cultural heritage is important for one’s self-esteem. When people loose their self-esteem and self- respect, they do not do well in life. It is very important for the welfare of our future generations that they learn the positive aspects of our culture and heritage

.K M Munshi

4  Niyatam kuru karma tvam karma jyāyo hee akarmanah

Sharirayātrā api cha té na prasiddhyét akarmanah

Always perform (your) prescribed duty. Action is better than inaction.

Even maintenance of the (physical) body is not possible without action.

Bhagavad Gitā, III.8

5   "India was the motherland of our race, and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages:

she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity;

mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all"

Will Durant, American Historian (1885 – 1981)

6     "India is the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grandmother of tradition. Our most valuable and most instructive materials in the history of man are treasured up in India only."

Mark Twain, American author (1835 – 1910)

     And finally I thank Mr Kalyanaraman who thinks he did something wrong; NO; never; I am unknown; but I have the fervent burning desire lest the old charm gets back. One media not siding the paper may not make the whole media or the university nor the researcher fake sirs. K Rajaram   IRS (R)  Thank you Let's grow. 


BVK Sastry (G-S-Pop)

unread,
Dec 22, 2022, 8:06:38 AM12/22/22
to bvpar...@googlegroups.com, john...@ames.ox.ac.uk

Namaste Rajaram Krishnamurthy ji

 

The issue is NOT about the young researchers work or the supervisor.

The issue is about the SILENCE of premier institution on a media misrepresentation of ‘FAULTY RESEARCH’.

The expectation is call for a ‘Review and Correction of the Thesis’. No harm to anyone.

The action initiation needs to come from the Institution.

 

1. I am with you on the spirit of : 

      < I have the fervent burning desire lest the old charm gets back. .. Let's grow.>. 

I accept your statement :< all of us are the cause of negligence > . Should we stop at that ? Should we all not strive to come out of < shame?> ?

When the identity is sullied by a claimed research coming under the umbrella of a reputed university ??   

It is fine to make a call < let's forget the past > ! But is it right to pain the past in black dark strokes ?   Should Gratitude to current academia for supporting a ‘research in to the historic classical language’ get tagged to the cost of ‘faulty research outcome as vindication to sully a nation –civilization –religion- community ancestors – prayer language systems> ?

 

2.  I am not any enemy of any institution or person ! 

      Good criticism when it comes from the scholars of tradition must be welcome by the youngster ! and the

       institution which has nurtured the team guiding the scholar.  Why get in to emotional trauma ?

 

    My education enterprise from a land –space framework beyond Bharath became a necessity to make the

    voice of core tradition heard on global platform, where it needed really to be heard ! Any difficulty in it ?

    For ‘commercial’- part of operation charged by you, Who taught you that ‘Samskruth needs to be only for

    Charity – free ??  All ‘Vidyas’ ( Education) must generate –proliferate ARTHA (= The three meanings :

    Wealth, Purpose and Tools to progress –defend).  Anyone who does it is a VIDYARTHI = A Student of

    Knowledge, A Professional and a Professor of Knowledge – Applications. This is called the ‘ PURO-HITA /

    GRUHASTHA- SHAASTRA Sampradaya. My endeavour is  Higher Education enterprise to deliver the

    benefits of YOGA –  SAMSKRUTH  to make a Dharmic living .  It is NOT a Charity as free discourse  –

     Ashram – Renunciation – recluse model –  dole dependency.  If Samskruth studies can not empower a

    student to make a good living here, then why teach it ?  Those who are ready for ‘ Moksha’ will seek it

     when they are ready.  We would not be debating here. For that matter,  if the credential of Cambridge

     thesis were not to lead to a ‘ Professorial Employment’, not even Rishi Rajpoot would step in to Harvard !

 

     As anyone else, I have my personal preferred views groomed by our culture, studies and practices.  

     Emotional attachment to sensitive topics like ‘ Samskrutham/ Hinduism….yoga …’ does not impartial

      criticism or support corrective action. The test is the deliverable : Pride – Identity – Truth – Wellness …  

 

3.  When an acclaimed institute resorts to ‘Stone Silence’ when a media report on thesis coming under its

     benign umbrella is tarnishing the ‘good name of the institution and its honoured academic tradition’ and a

     ‘Scholarly tradition of a classical language’,  it appears suspicious !

     The institution cannot, at least at this stage, wash of its hands by passing the buck to thesis – supervisor.

     The premier institution must raise up to the occasion and seek action to review afresh the thesis and

     findings. And should be obvious enough: The reporting media must make a  public apology for

      misrepresenting the Cambridge Thesis !  

 

     Has anyone seen /sought a line of action for Honest academic action to uphold Integrity of Research –

     Scholarly output ?  This is no demeaning of good work and efforts put up by the team and opportunity

     provided by the institution.

 

4.  Vak-Yoga is  Vedic name for Samskrutham: the Language addressed by Panini – Patanjali.

     Vak-Yoga is not connected with Jyotish streams of Late Dr. B V Raman and others.

 

5. And why bring in my age in to this debate  and opportunities at Bharath ? Not a relevant  issue at all !

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages