Q. Is it correct to ellipse bhavān and bhavati in a sentence and use Prathama Purusha (third person) verb forms like गच्छतु, वदतु, etc.? A. First, understand what is bhavān and bhavati.
Bhavān is the masculine and bhavati is the feminine singular prathama vibhakti of bhavat (a noun base or
pratipadikam), which is formed by adding the डवतु pratyaya (suffix) with भा dhātu (verbal root) [भाति = विद्यते इति भवत्].
It literally means one who's present. It is used for highlighting the listener without addressing him. When we don't want to talk to somebody, we use a mediator, right? These two words just play that role. Like using your son to talk to your wife after a fight.
Now suppose the son isn't there and you address him to talk to your wife. Generally, anyone, including your wife, would think you have gone crazy.
Similarly, you make a fool out of yourself if you use Prathama Purusha when trying to ellipse bhavān and bhavati.
Because it would automatically make it a direct conversation and require mandatory use of Madhyama Purusha (वद, गच्छ) as we do with त्वम्.
This can also be seen in Sanskrit texts themselves, where using Madhyama Purusha is normal for kings, gurus, old men, and even deities. It was not considered disrespectful.
• To understand
how it became mainstream, please read this:
bit.ly/3CX2Zpw• Know about
3 more common errors :
bit.ly/3CTwsAF Please share this. I rarely ask you to share, no? ^_^